JavaScript and Cookies are required to view this site. Please enable both in your browser settings.
New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed - Section 3

New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed 

Current Rating:

Unlimited Views No Ads No Algorithms Lifetime Account

Documenting Reality

Community Forum · Est. 2006

Join Now
Thread Tools
  #21  
11-28-2010, 08:42 PM
kik's Avatar
kik
Offline:
My Rank: SERGEANT
Poster Rank:972
Male
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 726
 
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss726
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

No there two different scenarios! this plane was only traveling about 150mph at most and the planes that struck the pentagon/world trade where going upwards of 300mph up to 500mph throw an apple at something with your hand and then use a baseball shooter then u will get the idea!
So you're trying to tell me planes do vaporize???.

Are you for real?.

I don't think I will be using "apples" as a demonstration any time soon....wow apples to simulate airplane crashes, you must be a scientist.
2 Users Say Thank You For This Post:
rafamarquez, trm82r
These 10 Users Said Fuck Off To This Post:
-JasonR-, Cool_Dog_Group, GingerBeard, hunterseeker, KinzxleighRheighfyl, MorbidCuriosityUK, rrrp, tatumthunderlips, TavNobbler, U2Addict
▼ PROMO FROM DOCUMENTING REALITY
Cheaper than child support
Join Now
Hidden for upgraded members.
  #22  
11-28-2010, 09:52 PM
lagunasun's Avatar
lagunasun
Offline:
My Rank: CORPORAL
Poster Rank:1536
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 367
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss367
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

the only remaining pics of starsky and hutch while they were still in uniform and without hutch's toupe. 10th down.
  #23  
11-28-2010, 10:13 PM
mook23's Avatar
mook23
Offline:
My Rank: PRIVATE
Poster Rank:6497
Male
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 33
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss33
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

So you're trying to tell me planes do vaporize???.

Are you for real?.

I don't think I will be using "apples" as a demonstration any time soon....wow apples to simulate airplane crashes, you must be a scientist.
LOOK ITS MAGIC
f4_image1.jpg
2.05 MB ·3748 views
f4_image3.jpg
2.48 MB ·4563 views
9 Users Say Thank You For This Post:
-JasonR-, AAJ71, cardsharksam, dhreiki, GingerBeard, hunterseeker, TavNobbler, Tsar Bomba, U2Addict
  #24  
11-29-2010, 12:02 AM
Rusty666's Avatar
Rusty666
Offline:
My Rank: FIRST SERGEANT
Poster Rank:396
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,035
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss3035
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

super thread
  #25  
11-29-2010, 02:31 AM
mook23's Avatar
mook23
Offline:
My Rank: PRIVATE
Poster Rank:6497
Male
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 33
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss33
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

f4_image1.jpg
2.05 MB ·2687 views
f4_image2.jpg
2.20 MB ·5184 views
f4_image3.jpg
2.48 MB ·2612 views
This User Says Thank You For This Post:
U2Addict
  #26  
11-29-2010, 06:42 AM
Sharon's Avatar
Sharon
Offline:
♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚
Poster Rank:34
Female
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 43,403
Contributions: 204
 
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 18/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss43403
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

Brilliant post, thanks!
  #27  
11-29-2010, 07:20 AM
kik's Avatar
kik
Offline:
My Rank: SERGEANT
Poster Rank:972
Male
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 726
 
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss726
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

You know I am so sick of this fucking F4 Phantom being used as a comparison to anything other then its intended use at the time.

The damn this was doing 488mph, its wing tanks were full of water....any dickhead knows water CANNOT be compressed.

The plane DID NOT vaporize, so for all you dickheads that insist it did I suggest you do your research.

The plane was used to see how far it would push the block of concrete, in essence the test was an abject failure, the concrete broke, the wing tips were in perfect condition and the plane in real terms turned into "confetti", small fragments of its former self, not a complete atomization as you FOOLS would have us believe.

Here is a small excerpt of the report.

"With very minimal damage to the concrete target block, the plane and its engines were easily converted into small chunks of metal confetti and shrapnel at the physical interface of the two impact objects. Upon initial impact, the follow-on rear portions of the plane yet to make contact retained their shape integrity until their respective impact."

The damage penetrated the block by two inches and cracked it, some say it was a test for a plane strike on a nuclear facility, this is false, the concrete used was not the same as used in nuclear facilities, the test was one of kinetic energy and inertia simple as that.

While we are on the topic of plane crashes the U.S conducted a simulated plane crash using a real plane a Boeing 720 piloted via remote control to supposedly test a new fire resistant fuel, this was bogus, the test was for sinister reasons only, not only did the plane explode it hit its intended target with pretty bloody good accuracy, although in this day and age if you wanted a plane to fly to an intended destination "fly by wire" would be the choice of the doomsdayer (my word)....no pilot just a programed on board computer with a pre-selected destination.

Maybe you should read up on this also, because the CIA at Langley were involved, WTF do they care about aircraft safety????.

Look up the "fly by wire" systems currently in use on the AB 320 and the AB 380.
These planes don't even need a pilot, when in trouble these systems will not even let the pilot take full control of his plane......hmmm pondering yet?, you bloody well should be.

listen not to the puppet on the podium, but to yourself, unless of course you are naturally full of shit, then listen to no one and go away and leave those with free thinking minds to go about their research without being disturbed by the ineptitude of people like yourself.

Posting the F4 FFS get a grip.
5 Users Say Thank You For This Post:
bushbarbie, feministj, NoelPuppet, trm82r, Vixənn
These 12 Users Said Fuck Off To This Post:
AAJ71, Cool_Dog_Group, dungeonpeaches, GingerBeard, hunterseeker, KinzxleighRheighfyl, LeadHead, rrrp, tatumthunderlips, TavNobbler, Tsar Bomba, U2Addict
  #28  
11-29-2010, 10:17 AM
Vedderman's Avatar
Vedderman
Offline:
Curmudgeonly Jackwagon
Poster Rank:181
Country Trash
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 8,293
Contributions: 281
 
Mentioned: 198 Post(s)
Quoted: 3659 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
3/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss8293
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

You know I am so sick of this fucking F4 Phantom being used as a comparison to anything other then its intended use at the time.

The damn this was doing 488mph, its wing tanks were full of water....any dickhead knows water CANNOT be compressed.

The plane DID NOT vaporize, so for all you dickheads that insist it did I suggest you do your research.

The plane was used to see how far it would push the block of concrete, in essence the test was an abject failure, the concrete broke, the wing tips were in perfect condition and the plane in real terms turned into "confetti", small fragments of its former self, not a complete atomization as you FOOLS would have us believe.

Here is a small excerpt of the report.

"With very minimal damage to the concrete target block, the plane and its engines were easily converted into small chunks of metal confetti and shrapnel at the physical interface of the two impact objects. Upon initial impact, the follow-on rear portions of the plane yet to make contact retained their shape integrity until their respective impact."

The damage penetrated the block by two inches and cracked it, some say it was a test for a plane strike on a nuclear facility, this is false, the concrete used was not the same as used in nuclear facilities, the test was one of kinetic energy and inertia simple as that.

While we are on the topic of plane crashes the U.S conducted a simulated plane crash using a real plane a Boeing 720 piloted via remote control to supposedly test a new fire resistant fuel, this was bogus, the test was for sinister reasons only, not only did the plane explode it hit its intended target with pretty bloody good accuracy, although in this day and age if you wanted a plane to fly to an intended destination "fly by wire" would be the choice of the doomsdayer (my word)....no pilot just a programed on board computer with a pre-selected destination.

Maybe you should read up on this also, because the CIA at Langley were involved, WTF do they care about aircraft safety????.

Look up the "fly by wire" systems currently in use on the AB 320 and the AB 380.
These planes don't even need a pilot, when in trouble these systems will not even let the pilot take full control of his plane......hmmm pondering yet?, you bloody well should be.

listen not to the puppet on the podium, but to yourself, unless of course you are naturally full of shit, then listen to no one and go away and leave those with free thinking minds to go about their research without being disturbed by the ineptitude of people like yourself.

Posting the F4 FFS get a grip.

You know, I can't speak for anyone else.

But I sure as fuck am sick to death of reading your egocentric bitching, pissing, and moaning on (what feels depressingly like) every other thread on this board. Seriously, do you actually DO anything here other than insult people, nitpick peoples' posts, and make a general misanthropic ass of yourself?

Please. Shut the fuck up already.
23 Users Say Thank You For This Post:
Ben Daigo, blazergrad, Cool_Dog_Group, Death_Hag789, dhreiki, dr.qrf, dungeonpeaches, Firegirl1, GingerBeard, hunterseeker, kalonuk, KinzxleighRheighfyl, Krusen72, LeadHead, piratesswoop, polaris_91696, RebatsivePulsard, rrrp, tatumthunderlips, TavNobbler, Tsar Bomba, U2Addict, VulpesInculta
These 2 Users Said Fuck Off To This Post:
rafamarquez, Vulnavia
  #29  
11-29-2010, 11:35 PM
tattufreak's Avatar
tattufreak
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:2625
Female
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 160
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss160
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

great pics
  #30  
11-30-2010, 02:06 AM
iEddy's Avatar
iEddy
Offline:
My Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS
Poster Rank:3992
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 79
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss79
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

Is that a guy hanging from a telephone pole?
This User Says Thank You For This Post:
Vulnavia


Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO