JavaScript and Cookies are required to view this site. Please enable both in your browser settings.
New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed - Section 3

Go Back  

New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed 

Current Rating:

Join NowJoin Now
 
  #21  
Old 11-28-2010, 08:42 PM
kik's Avatar
kik
Offline:
My Rank: SERGEANT
Poster Rank:962
Male
Join Date: Apr 2010
 
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 16/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss726
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johndoe123 View Post
No there two different scenarios! this plane was only traveling about 150mph at most and the planes that struck the pentagon/world trade where going upwards of 300mph up to 500mph throw an apple at something with your hand and then use a baseball shooter then u will get the idea!
So you're trying to tell me planes do vaporize???.

Are you for real?.

I don't think I will be using "apples" as a demonstration any time soon....wow apples to simulate airplane crashes, you must be a scientist.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kik For This Useful Post:
rafamarquez, trm82r
The Following 9 Users Said Fuck Off to kik For This Post:
-JasonR-, Cool_Dog_Group, GingerBeard, hunterseeker, MorbidCuriosityUK, rrrp, tatumthunderlips, TavNobbler, U2Addict
  #22  
Old 11-28-2010, 09:52 PM
lagunasun's Avatar
lagunasun
Offline:
My Rank: CORPORAL
Poster Rank:1513
Join Date: Jan 2010
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss367
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

the only remaining pics of starsky and hutch while they were still in uniform and without hutch's toupe. 10th down.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-28-2010, 10:13 PM
mook23's Avatar
mook23
Offline:
My Rank: PRIVATE
Poster Rank:6438
Male
Join Date: Oct 2009
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss33
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

Quote:
Originally Posted by kik View Post
So you're trying to tell me planes do vaporize???.

Are you for real?.

I don't think I will be using "apples" as a demonstration any time soon....wow apples to simulate airplane crashes, you must be a scientist.
LOOK ITS MAGIC
Documenting Reality
f4_image1.jpg  



.
f4_image3.jpg  



.
Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to mook23 For This Useful Post:
-JasonR-, AAJ71, cardsharksam, dhreiki, GingerBeard, hunterseeker, TavNobbler, Tsar Bomba, U2Addict
  #24  
Old 11-29-2010, 12:02 AM
Rusty666's Avatar
Rusty666
Offline:
My Rank: FIRST SERGEANT
Poster Rank:391
Join Date: Jan 2010
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss3035
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

super thread
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-29-2010, 02:31 AM
mook23's Avatar
mook23
Offline:
My Rank: PRIVATE
Poster Rank:6438
Male
Join Date: Oct 2009
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss33
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

Quote:
Originally Posted by mook23 View Post
LOOK ITS MAGIC
Documenting Reality
f4_image1.jpg  



.
f4_image2.jpg  



.
f4_image3.jpg  



.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mook23 For This Useful Post:
U2Addict
  #26  
Old 11-29-2010, 06:42 AM
Sharon's Avatar
Sharon
Offline:
♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚
Poster Rank:32
Female
Join Date: Nov 2008
Contributions: 204
 
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Quoted: 2280 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 18/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss43405
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

Brilliant post, thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-29-2010, 07:20 AM
kik's Avatar
kik
Offline:
My Rank: SERGEANT
Poster Rank:962
Male
Join Date: Apr 2010
 
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 16/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss726
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

Quote:
Originally Posted by mook23 View Post
LOOK ITS MAGIC
You know I am so sick of this fucking F4 Phantom being used as a comparison to anything other then its intended use at the time.

The damn this was doing 488mph, its wing tanks were full of water....any dickhead knows water CANNOT be compressed.

The plane DID NOT vaporize, so for all you dickheads that insist it did I suggest you do your research.

The plane was used to see how far it would push the block of concrete, in essence the test was an abject failure, the concrete broke, the wing tips were in perfect condition and the plane in real terms turned into "confetti", small fragments of its former self, not a complete atomization as you FOOLS would have us believe.

Here is a small excerpt of the report.

"With very minimal damage to the concrete target block, the plane and its engines were easily converted into small chunks of metal confetti and shrapnel at the physical interface of the two impact objects. Upon initial impact, the follow-on rear portions of the plane yet to make contact retained their shape integrity until their respective impact."

The damage penetrated the block by two inches and cracked it, some say it was a test for a plane strike on a nuclear facility, this is false, the concrete used was not the same as used in nuclear facilities, the test was one of kinetic energy and inertia simple as that.

While we are on the topic of plane crashes the U.S conducted a simulated plane crash using a real plane a Boeing 720 piloted via remote control to supposedly test a new fire resistant fuel, this was bogus, the test was for sinister reasons only, not only did the plane explode it hit its intended target with pretty bloody good accuracy, although in this day and age if you wanted a plane to fly to an intended destination "fly by wire" would be the choice of the doomsdayer (my word)....no pilot just a programed on board computer with a pre-selected destination.

Maybe you should read up on this also, because the CIA at Langley were involved, WTF do they care about aircraft safety????.

Look up the "fly by wire" systems currently in use on the AB 320 and the AB 380.
These planes don't even need a pilot, when in trouble these systems will not even let the pilot take full control of his plane......hmmm pondering yet?, you bloody well should be.

listen not to the puppet on the podium, but to yourself, unless of course you are naturally full of shit, then listen to no one and go away and leave those with free thinking minds to go about their research without being disturbed by the ineptitude of people like yourself.

Posting the F4 FFS get a grip.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to kik For This Useful Post:
bushbarbie, feministj, NoelPuppet, trm82r, Vixənn
The Following 11 Users Said Fuck Off to kik For This Post:
AAJ71, Cool_Dog_Group, dungeonpeaches, GingerBeard, hunterseeker, LeadHead, rrrp, tatumthunderlips, TavNobbler, Tsar Bomba, U2Addict
  #28  
Old 11-29-2010, 10:17 AM
Vedderman's Avatar
Vedderman
Offline:
Curmudgeonly Jackwagon
Poster Rank:184
Country Trash
Join Date: Dec 2009
Contributions: 281
 
Mentioned: 181 Post(s)
Quoted: 3373 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
4/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss8015
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

Quote:
Originally Posted by kik View Post
You know I am so sick of this fucking F4 Phantom being used as a comparison to anything other then its intended use at the time.

The damn this was doing 488mph, its wing tanks were full of water....any dickhead knows water CANNOT be compressed.

The plane DID NOT vaporize, so for all you dickheads that insist it did I suggest you do your research.

The plane was used to see how far it would push the block of concrete, in essence the test was an abject failure, the concrete broke, the wing tips were in perfect condition and the plane in real terms turned into "confetti", small fragments of its former self, not a complete atomization as you FOOLS would have us believe.

Here is a small excerpt of the report.

"With very minimal damage to the concrete target block, the plane and its engines were easily converted into small chunks of metal confetti and shrapnel at the physical interface of the two impact objects. Upon initial impact, the follow-on rear portions of the plane yet to make contact retained their shape integrity until their respective impact."

The damage penetrated the block by two inches and cracked it, some say it was a test for a plane strike on a nuclear facility, this is false, the concrete used was not the same as used in nuclear facilities, the test was one of kinetic energy and inertia simple as that.

While we are on the topic of plane crashes the U.S conducted a simulated plane crash using a real plane a Boeing 720 piloted via remote control to supposedly test a new fire resistant fuel, this was bogus, the test was for sinister reasons only, not only did the plane explode it hit its intended target with pretty bloody good accuracy, although in this day and age if you wanted a plane to fly to an intended destination "fly by wire" would be the choice of the doomsdayer (my word)....no pilot just a programed on board computer with a pre-selected destination.

Maybe you should read up on this also, because the CIA at Langley were involved, WTF do they care about aircraft safety????.

Look up the "fly by wire" systems currently in use on the AB 320 and the AB 380.
These planes don't even need a pilot, when in trouble these systems will not even let the pilot take full control of his plane......hmmm pondering yet?, you bloody well should be.

listen not to the puppet on the podium, but to yourself, unless of course you are naturally full of shit, then listen to no one and go away and leave those with free thinking minds to go about their research without being disturbed by the ineptitude of people like yourself.

Posting the F4 FFS get a grip.

You know, I can't speak for anyone else.

But I sure as fuck am sick to death of reading your egocentric bitching, pissing, and moaning on (what feels depressingly like) every other thread on this board. Seriously, do you actually DO anything here other than insult people, nitpick peoples' posts, and make a general misanthropic ass of yourself?

Please. Shut the fuck up already.
Reply With Quote
The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to Vedderman For This Useful Post:
Ben Daigo, blazergrad, Cool_Dog_Group, Death_Hag789, dhreiki, dr.qrf, dungeonpeaches, Firegirl1, GingerBeard, hunterseeker, kalonuk, Krusen72, LeadHead, piratesswoop, polaris_91696, RebatsivePulsard, rrrp, tatumthunderlips, TavNobbler, Tsar Bomba, U2Addict, VulpesInculta
The Following 2 Users Said Fuck Off to Vedderman For This Post:
rafamarquez, Vulnavia
  #29  
Old 11-29-2010, 11:35 PM
tattufreak's Avatar
tattufreak
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:2606
Female
Join Date: Aug 2009
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
1/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss159
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

great pics
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-30-2010, 02:06 AM
iEddy's Avatar
iEddy
Offline:
My Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS
Poster Rank:3961
Join Date: Oct 2009
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss79
Re: New Photos Found Of PSA Flight 182 That Crashed

Is that a guy hanging from a telephone pole?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to iEddy For This Useful Post:
Vulnavia

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO