|
#272
●
02-07-2023, 05:13 PM
|
|
Re: Russian/Ukraine War Discussion Thread IV
The problem here drag is that you just throw dubious "evidence" and propaganda around with zero responsibility and treat it as if it's fact. And when people disagree you just arrogantly laugh-emoji it off to deflect criticism. This is why people beat up on you in here. That and you laugh when "Ukies" get killed and in the next breath accuse others of the same when Russians are killed.
|
|
#273
●
02-07-2023, 05:25 PM
| ||||||||
| So Fucking Banned Poster Rank:621 Orc of Mount Gundabad Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 1,446 Mentioned: 11 Post(s) Quoted: 900 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Russian/Ukraine War Discussion Thread IV
You forgot to add with chemical weapons. When Russians are killed with chemical weapons. Or when they have been executed in cold blood after they have surrendered themselves. |
|
#274
●
02-07-2023, 05:33 PM
|
|
Re: Russian/Ukraine War Discussion Thread IV
"...unofficial statement of his comrade..." Yes...start with that. The very least, include a statement from his comrade. As far as we know( i know ) his comrade may be dead alongside with that guy and there is no statement, just some tick-tockers´ opinion based on the same video we saw. For me, it seems quite clear that the guy takes a shrapnel through his head/neck. You can see its trajectory going right under his head and hitting the bank of that stream further down. Damage to the spine/brain would cause you to flop around like that. You can also see from the smoke that there is quite significant wind, and it would blow away chemicals. Also, chemical attacks at such a small scale are a lot less effective than using the regular VOG's. There is nothing to be gained from using chem-grenades. Out in the open like that, their lethal range is probably less than what a regular grenade has. Also, the way those weapons are handled doesn't suggest that they are chemical weapons. You wouldn't put makeshift containers with volatile chemicals into an unventilated room with yourself and your team. |
|
#275
●
02-07-2023, 05:51 PM
| ||||||||
| So Fucking Banned Poster Rank:621 Orc of Mount Gundabad Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 1,446 Mentioned: 11 Post(s) Quoted: 900 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Russian/Ukraine War Discussion Thread IV
Well, forgive me Dr Scorpio for... well, I don't know what is your problem with me and I don't really care. |
|
#276
●
02-07-2023, 05:57 PM
|
|
Re: Russian/Ukraine War Discussion Thread IV
Once your read something in your Z echo chamber you just can't let it go can you... why the hell would you bother with chemical weapons that might not even be lethal when you can just drop a cheap VOG grenade with a 3D printed tail that will kill easily. If you're Ukraine and use chemical weapons, and it gets out, and there's actual proof not dreamed up in some Rus vatnik's Telegram channel, the international community will not like it one bit and may stop sending Ukraine aid. That's a fatal mistake they can't afford to make. It makes no sense and will only hurt them. |
|
#277
●
02-07-2023, 05:59 PM
|
|
Re: Russian/Ukraine War Discussion Thread IV
You don't need to be a neurosurgeon to recognize that a guy flopping around in water may have a significant head/spine injury. You're just salty that you're getting stomped in here.
|
|
#278
●
02-07-2023, 06:01 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: CORPORAL Poster Rank:1524 Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 372 Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Quoted: 279 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Russian/Ukraine War Discussion Thread IV
Yo, tell us. What do others around you say about this 'special operation'? What did you all expect?
|
|
#280
●
02-07-2023, 06:08 PM
|
|
Re: Russian/Ukraine War Discussion Thread IV
Why would you think i have a problem with you...or that im a neurosurgeon, or a chemist? Your reply was so unhinged that i don't really even understand it. My best guess is that you simply don't understand the basics of reasoning and argumentation. If i remember correctly, you identified yourself as severely religious, which would also mean you lack basic critical skills. I don't. Asking questions, looking at the evidence, and providing reasons is completely normal for everybody else. What I did in my post is basic reasoning. You should try it. I know a thing or two about chemical weapons. I know a thing or two about brains and neural nets. I know a thing or two about injuries to the brain/spine( learned quite a lot from this forum actually ). You can see normal vog grenades having a similar effect on the enemy. They fall down, roll around, try to wave their broken arms and legs. and so on. You don't need to be an expert to use critical thinking skills. Chemical weapons are ineffective in most situations. Their use must be carefully planned to make them useful( i.e attacking in closed spaces, low grounds/trenches when the weather is just right etc ). Even a slight wind is enough to render them completely useless by carrying away the toxin. Small chem bombs like that are just massively more trouble than they could ever be worth. Storing and making the chems would probably kill more of your own than the enemy, not to mention the potential international fallout once caught. Minor claims require minor evidence...extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You made quite a huge claim about using chem weapons. Your expectation of people simply believing you because you said so is ...strange. Of course, people ask for citations, sources and evidence. I added some images to highlight the fragment trajectory. Go and check the video in slow mo yourself. Its quite clear. ![]() ![]() |