[PowerOut]

But da formula is simple and proven time n time again alredy: anglosaxon = liar/murderer : land/resource grabber. Dem be da plunderin' pillagin' vikings yo.

[CuriousCanadian]

yes and why was there a big ROUND HOLE in the 5th INTERIOR RING?
A round hole on the outside - which was quickly hidden by breaking the wall down....BUT why was there a ROUND hole on the inside as well

Anyone has the pic - poster up

[rob666]

Originally Posted by ikfish ↗

At the risk of being called a fuckwad again I would point out that the truth of a thing is found not by denouncing what you disagree with but by a reasoned assessment of the available information at hand. It's easy to poo poo any information that tends to support the fact that terrorists flew a hijacked AA Jet in to the Pentagon especially if you are separated geographically. I've lived within 10 miles of the Pentagon since 1967. I ride the commuter bus to it, ride the metro rail under it, have friends that work at it and know people that died in it. I know the neighborhoods around it, the highways next to it and have friends that live near it in Arlington. I watch the local news, I read the local paper the Washington Post, I talk to people that live and work here.

Do you really think for one second because I didn't see a video of an American Airlines jet flying across the parking lot of the Pentagon that I think that there is a conspiracy? Do you really think that you know more than I do because you live somewhere far away and look up shit on the internet?
I'll do a teensy bit of research for you since you seem too lazy to see if possibly I just be right and I do know what I'm talking about. Check this link and read what actual eyewitnesses saw and said. http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-s...p01/attack.hml

I just find it kinda odd that the miltary headquarters of the worlds only superpower didn't even have 1 camera pointed at it.......... thats all.

[RBM11]

The government couldn't even pull off the Watergate break in correctly how the fuck is a conspiracy that could only require hundreds if not thousands of men to not only secretly plant tons of explosives in the WTC and shoot a missile at the Pentagon while keeping quiet the average soldiers who would've been in a base which launched a missile that happened to have plane decals, engine parts, etc.

It's not a matter of being a sheep who trusts the government it's a matter of not being a fucking retard anarchist.

[CuriousCanadian]

I believe there is some sort of secrecy act for whatever operation you're apart of....

open your mouth: you lose everything+ risk being imprisoned for life.

open your mouth some more: you end up DEAD!

Thats a strong deterrent!


And for the people that do get info out - the government are experts at dis-information and discrediting people eg:

-Joe Blow releases info.
-Gov't discredits him by saying/showing something like, hey - here's Joe Blows medical records and it shows he's taking meds for delusions or whatever.
-So, now - nobody believes him! Even though this isn't true - are you going to track him down and verify it. Of course not.

[quen_to]

If every involved person just know his little part of the plan and not the whole operation, you will have good chances that the truth never comes out.... do you think, the gov. is dump as many of the people who voted for them?? God are you a dreamer! This was an operation under false flag, to much things doesen't fit and the hole story seems to be constructed...

[irishbum04]

Maybe you all need to look at all the information available instead of just the conspiracy theorist opinions that support your belief in our evil government?

Plenty of private sector experts have come forward and said the damage in the Pentagon absolutely was caused by a plane not to mention the dozens of eye witness accounts of people who actually saw the plane, the fact that this video was initially released by the government itself... yeah, because that would be smart, releasing the proof of your lie yourself (even a bad quality one)... uh huh, sure guys... and of course there is the identified plane parts found on site including a stamped fuselage part, the clipped light poles from where the plane hit ground level for the impact, etc.

Of course, these are the same people who think a frame from a one-frame-per-second video reel showing something travelling at a couple hundred miles an hour minimum should give you a clear, distinct image of what it is... but those same people are too fundamentally retarded to understand the basics of science nonetheless things like physics and motion.



Sometimes folks the "bad" people really do something "bad."

[irishbum04]

Or you could start with looking at what experts say a missile WOULD do to the Pentagon and those experts say that a missile of that size, to be seen on video at that distance from the camera and appear that large, would carry a payload that would have vaporized a much larger chunk of building and the grounds.

Start there instead of digging for secret people in the shadows who are out to get you.

[irishbum04]

"It's clearly too small and and the wrong shape to be a 757 and also to fly along at the height would take some doing from an experienced pilot."


How close do you think that is to the camera bucko? Let me give you a hint, the thing you are seeing is not a cruise missile sized object. Learn a little math, get the height of the pentagon, and figure out how far that is from the camera based on the wall as it shrinks into the distance.

Its as if you all see one piece of "proof" and run with it without actually thinking about it.

Apparently none of you have ever served a day in the military if you think a "missile" of the necessary size would have done that minimal of damage.

But that's right, it was a specially designed missile that was the rough size and shape of a jet liner but only carried a few pounds of military grade explosive to perfectly mimic jet-liner damage.

Not only that, but they added wings to confuse all the eye-witnesses who saw the jet at various phases of its descent.

Oh, and takes a good bit of skill to pinpoint two jets into the sides of two towers the way they did, but they did it... but I guess it was probably a trained Airforce maverick at the controls in conspiracy land.

[CuriousCanadian]

Considering all that we have uncovered it's clear to us how effective this missile theory counter-intelligence effort has been. Think about the source. The missile was first mentioned by Donald Rumsfeld himself in what was written off as a slip of the tongue but then it was made famous by French conspiracy author Thierry Meyssan within the first months after the event.

But the most effective catalyst for this disinformation came in early 2002 with the unofficial leak of the blatantly doctored 5 frames from the Pentagon security gate camera. This incredibly effective psychological manipulation tool has been the single most over-analyzed piece of invalid government supplied "evidence" to date. It has caused the movement to be fixated on what could be discerned from the grainy ambiguous video frames as allegedly "hitting the building" while completely diverting us from the true smoking gun - the actual flight path of the plane.
Nothing that has been controlled and provided for by the government can fairly be accepted as valid evidence in any way shape or form. They aren't going to hand us a video tape proving what really happened and they certainly didn't do this when they deliberately leaked the doctored 5 frames in 2002. Obviously this was part of the plan.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...6327617173136#