[MsHell]

I was thinking the exact same thing, unless you have children in the car (then I would say get those kids to safety) but if it was me and no kids, I'd like to think my 1st instinct would be, put foot to the floor and run that fucker over.

[finley]

what the fuck is going on in this thread

[quetza]

Originally Posted by finley ↗

what the fuck is going on in this thread

All of life’s problems are being worked out. Post, by post.

[Trucked up]

Can that girl say fuck any more times? She screwed up & had some regular words in her sentences.

[Meowlacy]

Originally Posted by scorpion9 ↗

Yes, and they were fine.
All women and all girls have always been fine after seeing naked people. There is nothing wrong about being naked. Its a learned religious behavior. Normal humans have no problem with seeing naked people.

Never said there was anything wrong with being naked. However pulling out your hairy dick and balls in a space where there should not be hairy dicks and balls is not appropriate.

And again, look how unskillfully you deflected the question and avoided responding :) Nice one.

i have no idea what the fuck you are talking about at this point.

Ill repost this question.

There is a penis/vagina.
There is a traumatized child after seeing a penis/vagina.

Yes. Do not think it might be a little frightening to see some asshole with giant fake tits with his junk out? Or where you were not expecting it? Just because you wouldn't be offended doesn't mean everyone else wouldnt.

Connect the dots.

If you think i said that they are not real then you failed to comprehend the question. Read it again and try to understand what I said. Im giving you an olive branch here. I give you a second chance to read what i wrote and actually understand it.


I don't only speak for all women and children. I also speak for all the boys and men. I speak for all humans.

Oh yeah? You sound like a religious zelot you cry about all the time with that statement

And yet, again, you fail to understand that you are body shaming men. How do you not understand that these things are one and the same.
Why is seeing a naked man "traumatizing" and "bad" if male genitals are not shameful?
Why?
Make a case. Be an adult.

Men should not be ashamed of their body. However if men have any self respect, they should keep their genitaila in their pants and stay out of spaces meant for those who do not have male genitalia. Even if only one little girl would feel uncomfortable.

It is not appropriate for a man who claims he is a woman to expose his junk to little girls.

Also, why do you single out men?
How about women with their flappy pussy and boobs? Is that traumatizing to little boys?
When a tiny boy is sucking his mother tit, is she being a pedophile? Is the boy traumatized?
No.

[/B]


The kid doesnt care, because he hasnt learned the sexual aspect of boobs yet. He literally doesnt care.
Same goes for all the children and genitals.
When a child sees genitals, all they do is point a finter and ask "What is that".
Sometimes, they may laugh, and it may make some men insecure...but that's the guy's problem.

These things are one and the same.
Why is exposing dick and balls wrong, if it isn't shameful?( and again, let's add vagina and boobs to be fair )

Its a common behavior of humans that predates religion

Yes, he wouldn't. I agree. Because he is a teenager.
If he was a kid...he wouldn't care. How did you breastfeed him if he was so ashamed of your nakedness and boobs? No. If you(the society) had never told him that nakedness was wrong, then he wouldn't care. There are countries and societies where families go to saunas and swim naked...all together, and no one cares. Its all societally pre-conditioned.


Of course, I have a problem with religion. Its one of the most evil things humans ever invented.

Yes, and it's sad. Really, genuinely and honestly sad. When I was a teenager, I thought religion had gone extinct during the age of enlightenment. Oh boy was I wrong when I found out how many stupid people there are in the world.



First, genitals arent only sexual. They are for peeing too you know. And 99% of the time, they do nothing at all.
But, more importantly, genitals are human, just like our hands are.
Again, you pick one part of the body to shame for whatever reason.
I can just as well say that the left hand of any human is bad and evil because some people use it to scratch their butts.



Yahwe as a prophet? :D are you nuts :D

Yahwe is your god. Yahwe is Jesus. Yahwe is the ancient Israelite war god....Yahwe is your god.




No, there are thousands of religions that don't recognize Jesus as anything.
Only abrahamic religions recognize him as something.(Jews and muslims dont recognize him as anything other than a human )
Only 1 religions recognizes him as something more than a first century scammer.

i

Also, you seem to be a fan of Jesus, yet, you have never read his so called "word of god". Why is that?
Why is it that in theory, you believe that gods word is the most important thing in the whole world, but in reality, you have never read his so called word?
Why?
Seriously, i want to know. I live in a country where such cult stuff doesn't exist. Im asking you, genuinely, to explain to me how it works.
How can you at the same time, say that something is the most important thing in the whole universe, and then not even bother to take a few days to actually read what that super important thing is?

because i literally didnt say any of that ya fucking retard.
I'will summarize the abrahamic religion for you( since you dont seem to bother to actually read your own cult books ).
Your god is:
1) Close to absolute evil
2) A mass murderer
3) Genocidal
4) Pro-slavery
5) Pro rape
6) Against women in every way possible.
7) Worse than the "Devil" or "Satan" characters in the books.

Thats just a short summary.
I challenge you( this is a real challenge btw ) - give me a list of all the evil things satan/devil has done in your cult book VERSUS all the evil things that your god has done in your books.

Hint: Satan in the Abrahamic mythology is the good guy. I dont think satans character ever lied in the book series, nor did he ever kill anyone, unless it was ordered by god.
Dont believe me? Do the adult thing and actually read the abrahamic cult books and build a list of the things Satan did, VS things Yahwe did.



Yes, I am.
Someone has to explain to you how shit works.
There is even a children's story about "crying wolf"
Have you ever heard it?
This is what you are doing with your "seeing a penis is a sexual assault". You are crying wolf. You and people like you, have almost completely desensitized me to sexual violence.
Is that a good thing?
Do you really think that its good to have people not care about sexual violence?

Really? You sound like you are making a case for sexual violence. I mean sex is natural right? Isn't it religion that says that it is shameful? Why dont we just fuck everything? Children, animals whatever? After all, sex is natural so why not? Religion made sex shameful right?




:D lol.
Think about what you just said.
Take a few minutes off, and think.

Who else is the money gonna come from if not from the people? All money is a human invention and it's coming from people.
And people don't make money by "capitalism".
They make money by creating value.

Socialism and capitalism are almost the same thing. The question is, how many people work towards the same goal?
If you work for your own singular goal, then its capitalism.

If a million people work towards the same goal, then it's socialism.

For example, if 100 million people decided together to work towards curing cancer, healing the sick and providing everyone with medical healthcare, then its socialism.
If one person works to pay their own singular medical insurance payment, then its capitalism.

All government projects and spending is socialism.
Firefighters are socialist.
Public schools are socialist.
Roads, railways, airports are socialist.
and so on and on.

[scorpion9]

Originally Posted by Meowlacy ↗

However pulling out your hairy dick and balls in a space where there should not be hairy dicks and balls is not appropriate.

"Appropriate" is a subjective term determined by culture and upbringing. In some countries, it's appropriate for you to argue against a man in a public forum, and in another country, it's appropriate to stone you to death for this.

Yes. Do not think it might be a little frightening to see some asshole with giant fake tits with his junk out?

No, of course not. Why should it be?
People are most vulnerable when they are naked.

because i literally didn't say any of that ya fucking retard.

Oh, so you arent a Christian, and you don't love that Jesus guy? Interesting to know.

Really? You sound like you are making a case for sexual violence.

You are the one promoting sexual violence. How can you not see it?
If you cry wolf all the time, then the society will start to ignore women who claim they have been sexually assaulted. If you want to protect women, don't mix someone's slight inconvenience with an actual violent sexual assault.

I mean sex is natural right?

Of course it is. And thats exactly why its peoples own business who they have sex with and how. Whether its men with men, men with women, women with women or a giant cluster gang bang where everyone plows everyone else.

Why dont we just fuck everything?

Do you want to fuck everything?
Is religion the only thing stopping you from fucking a horse?
I have a hunch that the answer is no.

People don't fuck everything because religion stops them. They don't fuck everything because they don't want to. It's that simple.

Religion made sex shameful right?

Yes, it did.
It did everything to control it, so the cults could make a profit.
It's all about money and power. Just go and read the Abrahamic cult books.
Before religion, if you loved someone, then you could just move in together, have children and live your life happily ever after.
After religion, if you loved someone, moved in together and started having children, you would be murdered....unless...you give church some money.
Sweet deal. Isnt it.
The church(your god) even sweetened the deal and said that children born out of marriage cant enter the church and be part of the congregation of god....for 10 generations. Innocent children, who had no say in how they were born are excluded from the cult as punishment for something their ancestors did. PS: being excluded from the cult at a time when the cult dominated everything was a big deal.

[Meowlacy]

Originally Posted by scorpion9 ↗

"Appropriate" is a subjective term determined by culture and upbringing. In some countries, it's appropriate for you to argue against a man in a public forum, and in another country, it's appropriate to stone you to death for this.

And bang children. Is it subjective to say banging children is wrong?


No, of course not. Why should it be?
People are most vulnerable when they are naked.


Oh, so you arent a Christian, and you don't love that Jesus guy? Interesting to know.

as I said, I never said I was Christian ya fucking retard! [/B]


You are the one promoting sexual violence. How can you not see it?
If you cry wolf all the time, then the society will start to ignore women who claim they have been sexually assaulted. If you want to protect women, don't mix someone's slight inconvenience with an actual violent sexual assault.

im not crying wolf. Wtf ate you talking about?


Of course it is. And thats exactly why its peoples own business who they have sex with and how. Whether its men with men, men with women, women with women or a giant cluster gang bang where everyone plows everyone else.

N4xt its adults and children


Do you want to fuck everything?
Is religion the only thing stopping you from fucking a horse?
I have a hunch that the answer is no.

People don't fuck everything because religion stops them. They don't fuck everything because they don't want to. It's that simple.

And some things are considered inappropriate. Like mens cock in balls in women only spaces with little girls. Only sick fucks want to do that



Yes, it did.
It did everything to control it, so the cults could make a profit.
It's all about money and power. Just go and read the Abrahamic cult books.
Before religion, if you loved someone, then you could just move in together, have children and live your life happily ever after.
After religion, if you loved someone, moved in together and started having children, you would be murdered....unless...you give church some money.
Sweet deal. Isnt it.
The church(your god) even sweetened the deal and said that children born out of marriage cant enter the church and be part of the congregation of god....for 10 generations. Innocent children, who had no say in how they were born are excluded from the cult as punishment for something their ancestors did. PS: being excluded from the cult at a time when the cult dominated everything was a big deal.

[scorpion9]

Originally Posted by Meowlacy ↗

And bang children. Is it subjective to say banging children is wrong?

Is anyone saying that banging children is right? (other than extremist Muslims)

Nope,
You jump straight into extreme slippery slope instead of just trying to understand the basic argument.

im not crying wolf. Wtf ate you talking about?

yes you are. You said it earlier, that you would consider seeing a man naked somewhere where you wouldn't expect it, to be a sexual assault.
Treating a "slight personal inconvenience" as "sexual assault" degrades the meaning of the word sexual assault and makes the society more apathetic towards women who claim to have been sexually assaulted and actually have been.

N4xt its adults and children

Again, you jump down this childish slippery slope fallacy.
Cant you have a decent argument without resolving to childish fallacies? Why is the next step "let's have sex with children" after "adults having consensual sex however they like"?
Can't you see a difference between a child and an adult?

[Meowlacy]

Originally Posted by scorpion9 ↗

Is anyone saying that banging children is right? (other than extremist Muslims)

Nope,
You jump straight into extreme slippery slope instead of just trying to understand the basic argument.


yes you are. You said it earlier, that you would consider seeing a man naked somewhere where you wouldn't expect it, to be a sexual assault.

Forced nudity, epecially forcing children to see nudity is considered sexual abuse. Treating it as normal in a place it should not be is grooming.

Treating a "slight personal inconvenience" as "sexual assault" degrades the meaning of the word sexual assault and makes the society more apathetic towards women who claim to have been sexually assaulted and actually have been.

So where did you get your PHd in sexual assult?. Not all assult is touching dumbass

You think it is perfecty fine for a little girl to go into a space and without warning is exposed to some mentally ill person's genitailia. A mans dick and balls who claims he is a woman just because he said so?


Again, you jump down this childish slippery slope fallacy.
Cant you have a decent argument without resolving to childish fallacies? Why is the next step "let's have sex with children" after "adults having consensual sex however they like"?
Can't you see a difference between a child and an adult?

Thats rich! Lmfao. You apparently can't see the difference between male and female. Even if a penis and balls are exposed. Mkay.


Hey, go into a woman's change room and walk around with your dick out, i dare you. Just film it so we can all enjoy the gore of the little girls father beating the shit out of you!

listen. I do not give a fuck what a person sexually identifies themself. Just keep your exposed genitaliain your pants, do not go into women's and girls spaces or if you do, at least be as discrete as possible. Do not tell my child men can get pregnant and menstruate. Do not tell me a chromosomal woman that my sex doesn't exist and try to refer my breast feeding my baby is called "chest feeding".

[lutherieguy]

Originally Posted by depraved1 ↗

AR15 variant of some kind, obviously.

There is no AK pictured, that I can see, as the commenter says this guy had.

Also, there is no “RPG”. ������������*♂️
The commenters are clueless.
The odds of a civilian having any kind of working RocketPropelledGrenade launcher is VERY SLIM.

(general public knows way less about firearms & weapons than they think)

Maybe he meant RPK?