[Meowlacy]

Originally Posted by scorpion9 ↗

Again, you just keep pulling shit out of your ass.
You know for a fact that im not an American and i don't give any fucks about democrats. I simply recognize that out of the 2 shit-sandwitches currently available in the US, democrats are far better. Its a simple fact.

Can you make any serious argument and not reduce everything into a stupid strawman?
Why would I wipe out my dong and balls around my nieces? Are they children? No. They are adults, already preconditioned to be ashamed of nudity...but...still, yes, they have gone skinny dipping with other naked men and relatives and they have never had any problems with it.

Because they exoected it and could have chose not to go swimming with nude family members if it made them uncomfortable. Women and girls have not chosen to go into a space with dicks and balls hanging out that's intended for females only. .


No, you don't seem to know what an explanation is.
Explanation is something that connects the dots of 2 or more observations or claims.

There is a penis/vagina.
There is a traumatized child after seeing a penis/vagina.

Yes. If it was not ecoected. When they have not consented.
Connect the dots. Paint a picture for me, and describe what goes on in your mind and in the mind of your imaginary child who gets traumatized.

The children and women i work with are very resl and not imaginary. Are you suggesting they are lying? B]

So, a 4-year-old walks into a shower and sees a man with his dingdong hanging out. She then starts screaming and runs in terror. She reaches her mom and starts explaining what had just happened.
What is her explanation?

Astor all trauma is is reflective in your dramatic interpretation /B]

I'll tell you one last time. A child doesn't give a fuck about genitals. Weather they see the genitals at the beach, shower, locker room, on the streets etc. Location is irrelevant. It doesn't matter.
Consent is also irrelevant. (Said every rapist child molester) Neither of those things will change what genitals are, and how children perceive those things.

So you speak for all women and children? I think you are focused on the world wide practice of decency and nudity. What im speaking about has nothing to do with body shame. My problem is not with the genitals. Its the person exposing them where they should not./B]


All religions teach body shame. You just don't recognize it for what it is. You, saying that being naked is wrong and showing yourself naked anywhere is immoral somehow.... that's what I'm talking about. You and other people who are constantly saying that the bikiny region is somehow "bad" and "immoral" or "traumatizing" or "disgusting" are the ones who are literally shaming parts of the body. Thats literally what you do. You pick a part of the body and arbitrarily say "this is bad. I don't want anyone to see it. Keep it hidden at all times."

I am not saying naked is wrong. I'm saying exposing dick and balls to little girls and women in a space that there should not be. Where it is not expected. Not to mention. By teenage son woukd not appreciate me walking around with my tits and vag out either.

It is a learned behavior. It was introduced by religions in an attempt to control women's sexuality.

Yes. I get it. You have a problem with religion. At least you are not just refering to Christians anymore.Too bad. Go to your safe space, pull out your dong and cry about religion all day. There are more people who practice religion than do not. So too fucking bad

And guess why we are so arroused by scant clothing or a glimpse of a boob or something?
Because of lifetime of body shaming that has kept women covered up and has kept men from seeing naked women on a daily basis.
I can tell you that if men saw naked women all the time, then they would be tired of it in less than a day or two. You can walk around beaches where women don't wear bra's and stare at all the boobs in the beach. Guess how long that craze lasts?
Even the biggest horn-dog stops staring boobs in less than a day. There were times when women werent allowed to show any parts of their bodies.
The argument was the same stupid one as what you just used, That men can't handle being around women unless they are bagged up( like in some Muslim countries even nowdays).
I as man can confirm that seeing women outside of bags hasn't really caused any problems for me. Seeing women with long jeans vs short skirts isn't a problem either. You can now make the skirt shorter and shorter and see...that nothing really happens once the skirt disappears.

Yes...you can see some of these stonings right on this forum...stonings performed in the name of christian god, because women didn't wear their black bags or expressed their sexuality in some way. (You mean Muslium gods? Dont you see that the same kind of sexual repression that sends many women into their early grave in some muslim countries is the same sexual repression that you promote with your genital shaming. Its the same thing. You just don't see it. The difference is that muslim men have picked different parts of the female body that are deemed "shameful" for the public eye.

So that makes it okay?
You picked genitals for shaming, they extended the body shame to legs/face.
Thats it.

Nooe. Genitals are sexual. We use them for sex. We dint use our ankles
Yup, the usual religious body shaming.
Also, a quick reminder just for you. Allah IS the Christian god Yahwe. So, if this was supposed to show that muslims are so bad...then, its important to remind yourself that they believe the same god Christians do.

As a prophet, not son of God. Almost all religions reconize Jesus in one way or another. But its is not Christianity that dictayes their religion.

Who is saying that choosing your gender changes your chromosomes? Saying so is so insane that noone has ever said so.
I dare you to find a scientist/politician/legislation that suggests otherwise.

You seem to thing everything is non binary.


Lack of stats is the stats. If there was any significant threat, then it would be known already. Also, ill say it again, the entire trans community is so tiny and insignificant, that even talking about it pointless. Politicians use this shit as a red herring. Putin(that muther fucking dictator) use is as part of genocidal state propaganda to rally up stupid people.

[
That's how this shit works.
I'll ask again, how many trans people have you seen in your life?
How many people do you know who have seen trans people?
The number is most likely 0.
So, even if all the trans men became rapists, then still, it would be a far less significant problem than the good old regular men.
But ofc, trans people are just the usual people and don't have any higher crime rate compared to anyone else.

You are right. I have not seen many genuine trans. I have seen plenty if suffering people dressed as something that they are not. Perhaps there is not many tans in your country. There is here and in US. My children go to school with a few.

Saying somethign this stupid is one of the reasons why rapes and other violent crimes against women go unpunished and un-reported.
You...with that stupid argument are empowering rapists...and you dont even understand it.

You as a man are going to tell me as a woman who has been raped and works with raped women and children doesn't "understand"? Thats rich. You sould like one of those white men you blab off about.

Calling something like that "sexual assualt" will diminish the meaning of the word sexual assualt. Nowdays, when a woman says that they were sexually assaulted...i dont honestly care. At least initially. Most men are starting to give less fucks because the meaning of the word "sexual assault" has been diluted to the point where someone can say " i was a victim of a horrible sexual assault " and in reality, all it turns out to be is " i saw a naked guy on my way to work ". Go and talk to women who have actually been sexually assaulted, beaten and raped....and tell them that "seeing someones naked willy" constitutes as an assault.

[B]Oh really? What do you define sexual assult wiith?B]


Also, id mention, that noone forced them to see male sex organs. They always had the chance to close their eyes and sing "la-la-la".
They could always just leave the room and wait until the trans guy has left.

Not when they pull it out wothout warning.



lol, this right here shows how little you are capable of thinking.
Nice way to engage an argument....even children are capable of understanding more than just " bla bla bla" :D

When someone is losing an argument, they often resort to personal insults. Carry on

What i said about socialism/capitalism is a fact.
Again, either live with it, or deny it.
There is no pure capitalism, there is no pure socialism.
All government programs are also socialist programs.

Nope. Not when that government funding comes from people who make the money usually by capitalism.

[scorpion9]

Originally Posted by Meowlacy ↗

Because they exoected it and could have chose not to go swimming with nude family members if it made them uncomfortable.

Yes, and they were fine.
All women and all girls have always been fine after seeing naked people. There is nothing wrong about being naked. Its a learned religious behavior. Normal humans have no problem with seeing naked people.

There is a penis/vagina.
There is a traumatized child after seeing a penis/vagina.

Yes. If it was not expected. When they have not consented.

And again, look how unskillfully you deflected the question and avoided responding :) Nice one.

Ill repost this question.

There is a penis/vagina.
There is a traumatized child after seeing a penis/vagina.

Connect the dots.

The children and women I work with are very real and not imaginary. Are you suggesting they are lying?

If you think i said that they are not real then you failed to comprehend the question. Read it again and try to understand what I said. Im giving you an olive branch here. I give you a second chance to read what i wrote and actually understand it.

Neither of those things will change what genitals are, and how children perceive those things.

So you speak for all women and children?

I don't only speak for all women and children. I also speak for all the boys and men. I speak for all humans.

What im speaking about has nothing to do with body shame. My problem is not with the genitals. Its the person exposing them where they should not.

And yet, again, you fail to understand that you are body shaming men. How do you not understand that these things are one and the same.
Why is seeing a naked man "traumatizing" and "bad" if male genitals are not shameful?
Why?
Make a case. Be an adult.

Also, why do you single out men?
How about women with their flappy pussy and boobs? Is that traumatizing to little boys?
When a tiny boy is sucking his mother tit, is she being a pedophile? Is the boy traumatized?
No.
The kid doesnt care, because he hasnt learned the sexual aspect of boobs yet. He literally doesnt care.
Same goes for all the children and genitals.
When a child sees genitals, all they do is point a finter and ask "What is that".
Sometimes, they may laugh, and it may make some men insecure...but that's the guy's problem.

I am not saying naked is wrong. I'm saying exposing dick and balls to little girls and women in a space that there should not be.

These things are one and the same.
Why is exposing dick and balls wrong, if it isn't shameful?( and again, let's add vagina and boobs to be fair )

By teenage son would not appreciate me walking around with my tits and vag out either.

Yes, he wouldn't. I agree. Because he is a teenager.
If he was a kid...he wouldn't care. How did you breastfeed him if he was so ashamed of your nakedness and boobs? No. If you(the society) had never told him that nakedness was wrong, then he wouldn't care. There are countries and societies where families go to saunas and swim naked...all together, and no one cares. Its all societally pre-conditioned.

Yes. I get it. You have a problem with religion.

Of course, I have a problem with religion. Its one of the most evil things humans ever invented.

There are more people who practice religion than do not. So too fucking bad

Yes, and it's sad. Really, genuinely and honestly sad. When I was a teenager, I thought religion had gone extinct during the age of enlightenment. Oh boy was I wrong when I found out how many stupid people there are in the world.

Nooe. Genitals are sexual. We use them for sex.

First, genitals arent only sexual. They are for peeing too you know. And 99% of the time, they do nothing at all.
But, more importantly, genitals are human, just like our hands are.
Again, you pick one part of the body to shame for whatever reason.
I can just as well say that the left hand of any human is bad and evil because some people use it to scratch their butts.

As a prophet, not son of God.

Yahwe as a prophet? :D are you nuts :D

Yahwe is your god. Yahwe is Jesus. Yahwe is the ancient Israelite war god....Yahwe is your god.

Almost all religions reconize Jesus in one way or another. But its is not Christianity that dictates their religion.

No, there are thousands of religions that don't recognize Jesus as anything.
Only abrahamic religions recognize him as something.(Jews and muslims dont recognize him as anything other than a human )
Only 1 religions recognizes him as something more than a first century scammer.

Also, you seem to be a fan of Jesus, yet, you have never read his so called "word of god". Why is that?
Why is it that in theory, you believe that gods word is the most important thing in the whole world, but in reality, you have never read his so called word?
Why?
Seriously, i want to know. I live in a country where such cult stuff doesn't exist. Im asking you, genuinely, to explain to me how it works.
How can you at the same time, say that something is the most important thing in the whole universe, and then not even bother to take a few days to actually read what that super important thing is?

I'will summarize the abrahamic religion for you( since you dont seem to bother to actually read your own cult books ).
Your god is:
1) Close to absolute evil
2) A mass murderer
3) Genocidal
4) Pro-slavery
5) Pro rape
6) Against women in every way possible.
7) Worse than the "Devil" or "Satan" characters in the books.

Thats just a short summary.
I challenge you( this is a real challenge btw ) - give me a list of all the evil things satan/devil has done in your cult book VERSUS all the evil things that your god has done in your books.

Hint: Satan in the Abrahamic mythology is the good guy. I dont think satans character ever lied in the book series, nor did he ever kill anyone, unless it was ordered by god.
Dont believe me? Do the adult thing and actually read the abrahamic cult books and build a list of the things Satan did, VS things Yahwe did.

You as a man are going to tell me as a woman who has been raped and works with raped women and children doesn't "understand"? Thats rich.

Yes, I am.
Someone has to explain to you how shit works.
There is even a children's story about "crying wolf"
Have you ever heard it?
This is what you are doing with your "seeing a penis is a sexual assault". You are crying wolf. You and people like you, have almost completely desensitized me to sexual violence.
Is that a good thing?
Do you really think that its good to have people not care about sexual violence?

Nope. Not when that government funding comes from people who make the money usually by capitalism.

:D lol.
Think about what you just said.
Take a few minutes off, and think.

Who else is the money gonna come from if not from the people? All money is a human invention and it's coming from people.
And people don't make money by "capitalism".
They make money by creating value.

Socialism and capitalism are almost the same thing. The question is, how many people work towards the same goal?
If you work for your own singular goal, then its capitalism.

If a million people work towards the same goal, then it's socialism.

For example, if 100 million people decided together to work towards curing cancer, healing the sick and providing everyone with medical healthcare, then its socialism.
If one person works to pay their own singular medical insurance payment, then its capitalism.

All government projects and spending is socialism.
Firefighters are socialist.
Public schools are socialist.
Roads, railways, airports are socialist.
and so on and on.

[deadhorsey]

I thought this thread was about a crazy, tranny-cunt.

[deadhorsey]

(Damn wrong thread)

[Budd Dwyer]

Kill tl;Dr writers

[san_chayin]

[pretty.kalypso]

Idk but the instant reverse was funny

[marble]

Certainly brings something of an edge to trying to live a normal everyday life.

[b1llygo4t]

Why are we talking about trans? Wasn't this shooter a nazi mexican?

Gotta give guns some credit, they sure don't discriminate. (Almost) every dick, jane and harry can hold the power to blow someone's brains out.

[MsHell]

Originally Posted by bliss ↗

Just saw the dash cam

3 vehicles could’ve ran this dude over

People have been conditioned not to intervene