[foxfantastic]

Originally Posted by Gorelord ↗

No, there isn’t.

Well, you're one of them, so now you know what an asshole is

[Gorelord]

Originally Posted by foxfantastic ↗

Well, you're one of them, so now you know what an asshole is

That doesn’t even make any sense. And I wasn’t talking about patents, I was talking about society in general making excuses for them.

[foxfantastic]

Originally Posted by Gorelord ↗

That doesn’t even make any sense. And I wasn’t talking about patents, I was talking about society in general making excuses for them.

Yes, when you make mistakes, you atone for them, and that is what countries that took advantage of African slave labor have done since then.

If you'd bother to lift your eyes from crime statistics, you would see the fruit of all those decades of healing: so many more people of color at university campuses and professional settings, working hard to bring themselves and their families out of the misery and blight that they inherited from their ancestors.

And nobody is making excuses for those who turn to a life of crime. They are prosecuted and punished according to their crimes.

[WonderMomma]

Originally Posted by Anal Dough ↗

Ah yes, the “collective guilt by melanin” argument—lazy, ahistorical, and cowardly all at once.

Three criminals commit a crime, and you sprint straight past individual responsibility, socioeconomic factors, crime statistics nuance, and basic human decency to land on 19th-century race essentialism. Bold intellectual shortcut.

Invoking Lincoln and slavery just to justify dehumanization in 2026 doesn’t make you edgy or honest—it makes you someone outsourcing moral reasoning to resentment and memes. If your takeaway from a violent crime is “an entire race was a mistake,” you’re not analyzing reality—you’re advertising how little thinking you’re willing to do.

Racism isn’t insight. It’s what people reach for when they don’t want to do the work.

Not sure how comments like yours don't count as a "racist comment" to the mods, but I see someone's triggered response landed them an infraction, which is ironic.

Unfortunately, not everyone is capable of answering racist pieces of shit in a calm, rational manner. Figured I'd pick up where he left off, sans vitriol. Cheers.

Save your breath. I’ve already tried to explain how ridiculously inaccurate this bumper-sticker mentality is. Yet it gets repeated anyway, ad nauseam, often by the same cast of characters.

Edgelordism or ignorance. Perhaps both.

https://www.documentingreality.com/f...ml#post8592694

https://www.documentingreality.com/f...ml#post8593949

https://www.documentingreality.com/f...ml#post8630474

The infraction to the other member was given for trolling after already being warned against doing it in other threads, repetitively.

People are allowed to state their opinions provide they can do so without using slurs, threats of violence, or repetitive trolling.

[Gorelord]

Originally Posted by WonderMomma ↗

Save your breath. I’ve already tried to explain how ridiculously inaccurate this bumper-sticker mentality is. Yet it gets repeated anyway, ad nauseam, often by the same cast of characters.

Edgelordism or ignorance. Perhaps both.

https://www.documentingreality.com/f...ml#post8592694

https://www.documentingreality.com/f...ml#post8593949

https://www.documentingreality.com/f...ml#post8630474

The infraction to the other member was given for trolling after already being warned against doing it in other threads, repetitively.

People are allowed to state their opinions provide they can do so without using slurs, threats of violence, or repetitive trolling.

“Trolling” is a very loose term applied by mods here when they want to silence opposing views. “Trolling” they agree with never seems to be met with a warning or thread ban. Weird.

[capratt]

The hardest challenge for black folks is learning how to shoot

[Analcuck]

Originally Posted by Gorelord ↗

“Trolling” is a very loose term applied by mods here when they want to silence opposing views. “Trolling” they agree with never seems to be met with a warning or thread ban. Weird.

Aww. What happened to free speech, right? Give me a fucking break.

“Trolling” is not a catch-all for opinions moderators disagree with. It refers to behavior like baiting, bad-faith posting, derailing threads, or repeating provocations after warnings. When moderation is applied unevenly, the explanation is usually pattern and conduct, not viewpoint. That distinction is basic, even if it is inconvenient to acknowledge.

What you're probably noticing is that the same kinds of posts keep getting violated because the same kinds of racist lowlifes keep showing a decided lack of self control. Racism isn't an "opposing viewpoint", it's a disgusting and intolerable expression of hatred commingled with ignorance. In a civilized society, that should go without saying, yet here we are.

Why don't you go play with your buddies at 4chan if you can't handle adults in the room redirecting the naughty children?

In the meantime, no, black people aren't any more inherently violent than other races, but guess what? They do stack at the bottom of longitudinal IQ studies, so that should put a little pep in your step.

[Gorelord]

Originally Posted by Anal Dough ↗

Aww. What happened to free speech, right? Give me a fucking break.

“Trolling” is not a catch-all for opinions moderators disagree with. It refers to behavior like baiting, bad-faith posting, derailing threads, or repeating provocations after warnings. When moderation is applied unevenly, the explanation is usually pattern and conduct, not viewpoint. That distinction is basic, even if it is inconvenient to acknowledge.

What you're probably noticing is that the same kinds of posts keep getting violated because the same kinds of racist lowlifes keep showing a decided lack of self control. Racism isn't an "opposing viewpoint", it's a disgusting and intolerable expression of hatred commingled with ignorance. In a civilized society, that should go without saying, yet here we are.

Why don't you go play with your buddies at 4chan if you can't handle adults in the room redirecting the naughty children?

In the meantime, no, black people aren't any more inherently violent than other races, but guess what? They do stack at the bottom of longitudinal IQ studies, so that should put a little pep in your step.

White knighting for a mod. And I thought I’d seen it all.

It’s ok I’m pretty sure she’s white so you don’t need to defend her like your favorite overly melanated miscreants.

[Analcuck]

Originally Posted by Gorelord ↗

White knighting for a mod. And I thought I’d seen it all.

It’s ok I’m pretty sure she’s white so you don’t need to defend her like your favorite overly melanated miscreants.

You managed to pack misogyny, racism, and a persecution complex into two sentences. Impressive efficiency.

Nobody is “white knighting” for a mod. I'm pointing out that people like you keep getting checked because people like you keep posting shit like this.

Dragging race into a moderation dispute just confirms the problem everyone already sees which, sadly, goes largely unchecked as mods are understaffed, unpaid, and burned out from the constant babysitting.

You and your throwback buddies are not being silenced for your views. You're being moderated for acting like a liability in public.

Try running a site like this with no rules or moderation and see how long it takes the powers that be to shut your shit down. Your sense of entitlement is laughably cute.

[Gorelord]

You’re just arguing to argue. Wagging your finger whilst labeling me every -ist you can think of. Sorry but that shit doesn’t work anymore, you must’ve not gotten the memo.

But, if it makes you feel better then have at it. One day all these minorities will parade you through the city on their shoulders, I’m sure of it.