|
#71
●
11-07-2010, 01:45 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:1850 Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 276 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 9 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Why Being Inbred Isn't a Good Look...
She just looks to have some birth defect deformity or syndrome. Interestingly: That pic is the best possible look she can have. The make up is pounded on, the hair is done and that dress is hiding her body. Imagine when she just rolls out of bed. And is everyone just assuming that these people are inbred or is there proof somewhere? I've seen women on TV who's dad's have fathered their kids and they look fine. Like that black guy (I have no clue who, but I saw them) with the huge disgusting dreadlocks who had long term "affairs" with his daughters. |
|
#80
●
11-11-2010, 02:26 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:1850 Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 276 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 9 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Why Being Inbred Isn't a Good Look...
Is there really any actual article or proof that these ugly girls are ugly because they were inbred? How does everyone know so much about inbreeding and the resulting look of the spawn to state that that's the problem here? It sounds like y'all are just assuming. They just look like they have birth defects or whatever ugly face syndrome or whatnot. |