[Beard]

Originally Posted by HOMBREMALO ↗

Yes, I see your point, but could you send a 7 year old down for life?,
Or worse.
The law is an ass.

Just because they're held to be legally culpable doesn't mean they'll face the same penalties as an adult. Just look at those two cunts that killed Jamie Bulger- they were both just 10 years old when they abducted and killed him, and ,though they were deemed legally culpable for murder and tried as adults, they only served 8 years in a young offenders institution.

Even though it's hard to comprehend, they both knew exactly what they were doing, despite their young age. In my opinion they should still be behind bars.

[skidmark steve]

I hate children

[idaho]

Originally Posted by airdna ↗

Regardless of how old the sibling is, he/she needs to be put in prison for the rest of their natural life, or perhaps executed. I don't care if the sibling was 1 minute old or 1 million years old, give them either life without the possibility of parole, or execute them.

People like you are why I choose to use the "ignore user" feature.

[little foo]

Originally Posted by Nickoda ↗

a young child cant be held responsible for something like this! the parents should have been more responsible with their bloody guns!! a child does not understand the consequences of their actions..

if the child who shot his sibling was over 5 years old his parents should be held responsible for not teaching their child gun saftey

[kboukes]

oh i hope this isnt a case of finding mum or dads gun and having a play!

[The2Halves]

Very good Marksman!

[MrCorpse]

if you want to get away with murder get your 2 year old to do it for you... bye them a lollipop afterwards and everyones a winner.

[StiffyWood]