|
#11
●
08-09-2024, 04:12 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS Poster Rank:3530 Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 98 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 22 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Passenger Plane Crashes in Brazil (ATR 72-500)
Maybe caused by icing on the wings like on Flight 4184?
|
|
#13
●
08-09-2024, 05:54 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:2928 Join Date: Jul 2024 Posts: 136 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 24 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Passenger Plane Crashes in Brazil (ATR 72-500)
I can't even imagine. I hope they blackout before they crash.
|
|
#14
●
08-09-2024, 05:56 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:12500 Join Date: May 2015 Posts: 9 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 4 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Passenger Plane Crashes in Brazil (ATR 72-500)
Clearly the pilots lost the ability to control altitude and pitch, in my uneducated, over documentary-ized opinion. Even without engines, if they had hydraulics to control movable surfaces that affect pitch and yaw (like flaps, slats, elevator, rudder), I’m not sure it would have been in a flat spin like that. |
|
#16
●
08-09-2024, 06:05 PM
|
|
Re: Passenger Plane Crashes in Brazil (ATR 72-500)
If you are in a flat spin the airflow isn't flowing over the control surfaces so they don't work properly (or at all). So a flat spin does not imply loss of hydraulics.
|