|
#2
●
06-05-2016, 09:08 AM
|
|
Re: Wave–particle Duality
Quantum mechanics as a theory, has always been problematic to many scientists, particularly to Einstein who believed that "God did not play dice" - in essence, he did not support the concept of quantum indeterminancy, or the indeterminant state of a particle until it was observed - which would collapse the wave function. Incoming theories, or revived theories such as Bohmian Mechanics, postulate a deterministic theory of particles. Whereas Quantum Mechanics accepts complete randomness in the quantum world, Bohmian Mechanics postulates that position and momentum are deterministic and can be resolved through both Newtonian Laws (classical physics) and the inclusion of the wave function, which, in this theory, acts as a pilot wave - a wave of probability which determines the quantum forces acting upon the particle. This is important, as Bohmian Mechanics removes the "randomness" from the abstract world of Quantum Mechanics and provides the explanation that the "randomness" which appears inherent in the double slit experiment, is explainable due to the uncertain measurement of position from which the particle begins in - each particle will be at slightly different positions, which in turn will cause the particle to follow slightly different trajectories. |
|
#4
●
06-05-2016, 05:32 PM
|
|
Re: Wave–particle Duality
All massless object r n all places at all times. No place at any time and in only that place when observed.. Btw.... It keps me up at night. I want to belive the moon and u r there when my eyes r closed. My dad used to tell me how can u say something is there n timr n space when it no longer there when you say... Its there.. Off topic but just as enjoyabe play on thought. My dad whould continue.. How can u have one of something and for that matter of anything? Any one thing had to have two to make it in the first place.. And that said.. Y does 1 come first in counting real numbers... And.. What the hell is nothing.. Is it black. ? Black is something.. Just the fact that nothing is called something must b .. Wait for it.. Something.. Right?..... How could it b.... ?.. ... Ur now. Was only his now. And yet aint her now yet |
|
#5
●
06-06-2016, 11:11 PM
|
|
Re: Wave–particle Duality
ach particle will be at slightly different positions, which in turn will cause the particle to follow slightly different trajectories.[/QUOTE] There is a flaw in bohmian explaination. The term used contextuality...ill add more when i get time.. Nobody understands nor wants to belive that the rules in the quantum world are real and true.. But so far they work and ig u like computers and anything with 0 and 1 then u are thankful we can control such things |
|
#6
●
06-10-2016, 04:26 AM
|
|
Re: Wave–particle Duality
There is a flaw in bohmian explaination. The term used contextuality...ill add more when i get time.. Nobody understands nor wants to belive that the rules in the quantum world are real and true.. But so far they work and ig u like computers and anything with 0 and 1 then u are thankful we can control such things[/QUOTE] Good to see you back dean. Great subject. I've only recently started reading about the topic. Got into a few books concerning what is Time itself in the last 6 months. Mind blowing stuff when you get into it. |
|
#8
●
06-10-2016, 04:49 AM
|
|
Re: Wave–particle Duality
Good to see you back dean. Great subject. I've only recently started reading about the topic. Got into a few books concerning what is Time itself in the last 6 months. Mind blowing stuff when you get into it.[/QUOTE] |
|
#10
●
05-15-2017, 04:56 PM
|
|
Re: Wave–particle Duality
If when not observed and if thru that photons can be in all states and places thru out time, it can be argued that each point may infact b another reality,. Mabe a dimention.... I dont know.. incredible stuff |