[SuceMaTub]

"This is complete nonsense, it is impossible," Vladimir Putin said, responding to a [9/11 conspiracy] question posed by an attendee of the Seliger 2011 youth forum.

Couldn't agree more with the Russian.

That said, is it really so wrong to ask why the Pentagon building, constructed for the US Department of Defense to discuss critically important, top secret Inspector Gadget-like intel, has only one shit camera (webcam?) on the scene.

Do you expect me to believe that they don't have every conceivable angle of that building covered, complete with a full-time staff to monitor the entire operation day-in, day-out? My shit little company has one just for a single building, lol.

So, Putin said it best..... absolute. I'm just wondering, when will they install some new video equipment to better protect our asses from future attack?

Conspiracy theory talk aside (seriously).

[flying-clipper]

Thanks for a great post. Could do with more like that on DR. This should give the "truthers" something to think about.

[DaDrizzle416]

1 that's a clean circular hole.

2 what's that square outline suppose 2 b of?

[Bastet]

Thank you for your work again

[Rille]

looks like one of those "bunker busters" to me...

[bode5997]

CRISPY

[The Driver]

very interesting

[.408Cheytac]

I am a person who is really interested in the events of 9/11. Not because I have an agenda, not because I have something to prove, not because I want someone to blame and not because I think something is astray, but solely because of the sheer magnitude of the event and how it has shaped our county and our foreighn policy both negatively and positively.

I really suggest that no matter what side of the fence you are on there are some very key documents to look over.

Document 1.) The 2 hour long recording of 95% of the radio transmissions that day. This is raw information that includes... but is not limited to...

And look I already have it for you!
http://www.documentingreality.com/fo...-9-11-a-87734/

Air-Traffic-Controllers
1.) Logan international
2.) JFK international
3.) O'Hare international
4.) LaGuardia international

Command Centers
5.) NORAD Region Eastern Air Defense Sector (US East SOCC)
6.) NEADS based out of New York Air National Guard Rome NY

7.)FAA Operations Centers
--A.)New England– Burlington, MA
--B.)Southern – Atlanta, GA
--C.)Great Lakes– Chicago, IL

8.)Each individual flight
--A.) American Airlines Flight 77
--B.) American Airlines Flight 11
--C.) United Airlines Flight 93
--D.) United Airlines Flight 175

9.) 13 other flights that came into visual/audio contact with the hijacked flights giving info to Air-Traffic-Controllers and the Pentagon.

10.) Direct contact with fighters scrambled to intercept flights.(These should NOT have been accessible, but they had to be vectored into the flights by ATC due to the fact that they had the best information on location as well as the only contact with people making calls from the flights.)
Also, 3/4 flights had completely cut off their transponders and thus only gave their position on radar... but not their Squawk flight code (used to identify flights) speed or altitude. This meant that ATC had to track them on radar and transfer information to higher powers.

11.) Conversations with mission control at the pentagon including the commands directly to fighters to shoot if jets were unresponsive to fighter interceptors or local towers of command.

12.) Conversations with flight attendants and passengers who had to relay information through United and and American "Flight Reservations" because they couldn't be patched to high command directly.

Military Installations
13.) Langley Air Force Base
14.) Fairchild Air Force Base
15.) Andrews Air Force Base
16.) Washington Center

(Tons of other communications)

Documents 2.) Flight Paths

All can be downloaded here...

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/index.htm

1: NTSB report, "Flight Path Study-American Airlines Flight 11," Feb. 19, 2002 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnotes 23, 33]

2: NTSB report, "Flight Path Study-American Airlines Flight 77," Feb. 19, 2002 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnote 53]

3: NTSB report, "Flight Path Study-United Airlines 175," Feb. 19, 2002 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnote 41]

4: NTSB report, "Specialist's Factual Report of Investigation-Digital Flight Data Recorder" for United Airlines Flight 93, Feb. 15, 2002 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnotes 70, 71]

5: NTSB report, Air Traffic Control Recording-American Airlines Flight 11, Dec. 21, 2001 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnote 24]

6: NTSB report, Air Traffic Control Recording-American Airlines Flight 77, Dec. 21, 2001 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnote 54]

7: NTSB report, Air Traffic Control Recording-United Airlines Flight 175, Dec. 21, 2001 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnotes 24, 41, 42, 44]

8: NTSB report, Air Traffic Control Recording-United Airlines Flight 93, Dec. 21, 2001 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnote 71]

Grow a spine and mind of your own look over all of the information yourself don't let someone else with an agenda in mind douse you with information. Think for yourself.

I just typed all of that so if I made errors I don't care... lol

[Billthegravedigger]

I get what you are saying, but will others ? I had a guy tell me the towers reached free fall speed, which is complete and utter horse shit. You could have dropped a ball from the top of either tower and it would have hit the ground in about 9.23 seconds, the same as it took the jumpers to hit the ground.

It took both towers over 15 seconds to collapse. It blows my mind some of the shit people try to say, with no evidence to back it up. You are doing good, keep it up man, don't let the nuts discourage you man.

[.408Cheytac]

And if you think the radio transmission is just fucking boring I picked out my favorite part!

Originally Posted by .408Cheytac ↗

Nasypany: Toledo was—look for him. Hey, I need a track number.
Nasypany: Ok. Hey, Brian, ok, 2 Syracuse birds will be airborne in less than 20 minutes,
any weapons?
[Background] Unknown: (Indistinct) near Pittsburg, mode 3, one five two seven.
Nasypany: We don’t know. Just press with that.
[Background] Unknown: We have any committed on the one aircraft with a
bomb on it?
Nasypany: We’re gettin to it. We don’t know where it is, we’re gettin’ track on it.
Unknown: Pass that to weapons.
Nasypany: Yeah. Ok. Got it.
[Background] Unknown: United nine three, mode 3, one five two seven.
Nasypany: Negative, negative clearance to shoot.
Nasypany: Jaime?
[Background] Unknown: One five two seven Brian.
Nasypany: God dammit. Foxy?
Fox: I’m not really worried about code words (indistinct).
Nasypany: Fuck the code words. That’s perishable information. Negative clearance to
fire. ID type, tail. Hey, let your guys know also.
105. 101145 NEADS Discussion with Syracuse Cdr
Nasypany: Sir, how’re you doing?
Syracuse CO: I’m doin’, well, as good as can be expected. Ah, I’ve got guys that will be
launching in about 15 minutes.
Nasypany: Appreciate it. Are they loaded?
Syracuse CO: We’ve got hot guns, that’s all I’ve got.
Nasypany: Hot guns, well that that’s good enough for me, for the time being. Only
words I’ve got, I’ve got another aircraft with a possible bomb on board. It’s in, ah,[/SIZE]