[corpsehands]

Originally Posted by Mr.Goodbar ↗

I enjoyed the crispy humans

mm mmmm mmm my favorite

[EWSER-X]

Pentagon WAS NOT hit by a plane. This was obvously a missile.

Inside job.

[ebneter]

Originally Posted by synthninja ↗

Because the sticker/plate is nowhere near the strongest part of the plane. Yet it survived...

The airplane was shredded. Some parts survived. Have you ever seen a plane crash site? Seriously, when a plane is torn apart, weird shit happens. It depends on what it hits, how it hits it, how fast it was going, how much it burned, what angle it hit at ... I've seen pictures of literally hundreds of aircraft accidents -- it's a hobby of mine -- and the "strongest" parts of the plane are sometimes utterly destroyed while pieces you'd expect to be tinfoil are intact. Airplane crashes are complicated and messy. A 747 crashed in Japan in what should have been a completely non-survivable way -- and yet, there were four survivors.

The 757 has 2 engines with some parts made of Titanium alloy. Very tough metal alloy. Where are the engines/part of the engines? Where's the marks on the walls where the engines should have struck. No grass marks...

Why were the windows intact where the wings would have hit.

This simply isn't true: Photographs taken before the collapse of the upper floors clearly show that the hole extended on both sides to a point that would be a bit outboard of the engines.

One engine was found inside.

But not two.

Which, you know, if they were going to fake it, don't you think they'd have gone to the trouble of putting two in there????

Here's another short 2 minute video. Take a little lookie, why not....

I've watched all the videos, dude, I don't need to watch them again. Honestly, most of them are made by scientific illiterates or intellectually dishonest people. They mislead sincere people, unfortunately.

EDIT: I also find it a bit difficult to take seriously a video that doesn't know the difference between a 737 and a 757.

[ebneter]

Originally Posted by BBKF ↗

I didn't know any terrorists that had actually been on the aircrafts that crashed had been found alive.

I did know the FBI had information before hand and didn't share it. The big tug of war between the different government agencies. The CIA hates the FBI who hates the CIA who hates the secret service who....it goes on and on....

But no..I did not hear of them being found alive and I would have to have proof of this.

None of the individuals identified as hijackers on 9/11 has been found alive. There are other individuals with the same or similar names, but given that some of them had very common Arabic names that is to be expected.

I've been reading a book called Disconnecting the Dots that makes a pretty persuasive case that it was the CIA that withheld information from the FBI and generally was the agency that sat back and let this happen. The author identifies a specific individual as a key actor in the whole thing. I don't know if I buy the story he's telling completely, but it's an interesting read.

[ebneter]

Originally Posted by synthninja ↗

I don't believe everything I'm told. That's just it.

They want war, and they are not out to protect you, don't think that for one minute. They want whatever is best for them, money driven as usual, obviously. But they want all of the cake. ie global domination.

Now as much truth as we can inject into the situation is as far as I'm concerned, better. Because things are not looking good. They used the terrorist shit to put up cameras everywhere and invade our privacy. At the same time giving them the war they wanted.

The good world that used to exist.....well it's ceasing to exist. People are becoming less free. Exactly the opposite of what America is supposed to stand for.

See, I don't disagree with any of this. But they didn't have to do anything other than let 9/11 happen to achieve this. No missiles, demolition, etc. etc., just ... don't stop it.

My personal opinion is that it was a lot worse than they expected it to be. I think they thought that it would be a couple hundred deaths; they never thought the buildings would fall, they never thought that all four hijackings would succeed.

[EWSER-X]

Originally Posted by ebneter ↗

The airplane was shredded. Some parts survived. Have you ever seen a plane crash site?

BULLSHIT

[Billthegravedigger]

Originally Posted by EWSER666 ↗

BULLSHIT

You are ? I believe it, you don't have to convince me.

[Billthegravedigger]

Originally Posted by EWSER666 ↗

Pentagon WAS NOT hit by a plane. This was obvously a missile.

Inside job.

Listen sport, if you are going to come in here and spout shit at every chance you get, bring some evidence. Otherwise, you will torn to shreds in here. Make sure it's original evidence, because so far, all of the shit has been disproved.

[dandroid]

the battle cry of 'inside job' seems to emerge from those who are really uncomfortable with the lack of control in apprehension of the original narrative...it is therefore easier for them to believe that the event had thousands of knowing participants rather than several dozens...

[Billthegravedigger]

Originally Posted by dandroid ↗

the battle cry of 'inside job' seems to emerge from those who are really uncomfortable with the lack of control in apprehension of the original narrative...it is therefore easier for them to believe that the event had thousands of knowing participants rather than several dozens...

Dandroid, AGAIN you have quite a way with words man. I agree, some feel underwelmed at the goverment's assesment of everything that happened. Rightfuly so too I might add. They did not stop it, and then allowed crazy ideas run rampant hoping it would hide the fact that they SERIOUSLY FUCKED UP.