[vladTI]

Can't fly a 757 at that speed that close and parallel to the ground, not to mention the bizarre path Hanjour is supposed to have chosen into the Pentagon. I've changed my mind about 9/11 about a thousand times now and will probably change it a thousand more times more. God, I love a good conspiracy theory.

[vladTI]

Originally Posted by jaybo ↗

Chris they could have had an on board go pro streaming as it crash and the conspiracists would think of something to talk about

What? Care to try that again in English?

[HelloNurse!]

I see the plane was flying low enough, for at least a decent part of time, to take a traffic signal with it.

[vulturedoors]

Originally Posted by reece86 ↗

don't you think a government building as important as the Pentagon wouldn't be built out of the strongest materials know to man?? that building would shred a plane and its wings into spaghetti!!

Exactly. The building was designed to withstand the massive force of an impact or a bomb. The plane was mostly vaporized, although a few bits like one of the engines made it through a building mostly intact. The wings, especially, are lightweight structures with low density, so they're basically gone.

[partyguinness]

Originally Posted by Glocifer ↗

Still very little to show of a plane

That's not unusual.

Did you see the remains of the plane the German pilot flew into the Alps a few years back or the plane carrying the footballers that ran out of fuel in S America last year?

Very little was left (the plane in SA had no fuel to burn either)...both planes just obliterated.....sorry I don't have a links. Also, remember a plane is essentially a hollow tube.

So the whole 'Oh so little wreckage ergo there was no plane.' theory......is just bollocks.

[partyguinness]

Originally Posted by vladTI ↗

Can't fly a 757 at that speed that close and parallel to the ground, not to mention the bizarre path Hanjour is supposed to have chosen into the Pentagon. I've changed my mind about 9/11 about a thousand times now and will probably change it a thousand more times more. God, I love a good conspiracy theory.

Why not fly a 757 at that speed and parallel? It's not like people try it all the time and fail.

Flying a high speed into a building isn't exactly course material at flight school but when you have very determined terrorists then why not.

The events that day were extraordinary with no precedent. The fact that something seemed unlikely does not mean it did not or could not happen. It was uncharted territory.

This time last year who would have guessed that Donald fucking Trump would be the President?

And here we are.

[partyguinness]

Originally Posted by vulturedoors ↗

Exactly. The building was designed to withstand the massive force of an impact or a bomb. The plane was mostly vaporized, although a few bits like one of the engines made it through a building mostly intact. The wings, especially, are lightweight structures with low density, so they're basically gone.

Exactly. The theorists basically act like this is something that happens all the time with plenty of examples to back up their point...well no.

They shite on about how little of the plane is left (from selective pics) and all of a sudden they are fucking metallurgic and aviation crash experts

[partyguinness]

Originally Posted by bbc396 ↗

Really makes you think twice about trusting anything the 'officials' tell you. I have an extremely hard time believing a plane hit the pentagon and all that remains is strategicly placed chunks. So the piece with the serial number just happens to get ripped off and not burnt, melted, scraped off ect?

So you believe that without anyone noticing:

1. that somebody or several people hatched a plan,
2. sourced mangled plane parts,
3. strategically placed said mangled plane parts in front of the Pentegon in broad daylight;
4. caused an explosion or fire;
5. made it all look like a plane had crashed;

Which means: -

a. said people are hiding or keeping this huge secret to themselves;
b. somebody somewhere punched in coordinates, launched a missile (which is one the theories) at the Pentagon..oh and this is also being hushed up.

So that just leaves one last question: where is the plane with the passengers if not obliterated at the Pentagon?

Mate, love the imagination but have you really thought this through?

[rotorot]

http://www.911myths.com/html/dancing_israelis.html

[bushbarbie]

Originally Posted by partyguinness ↗

Why not fly a 757 at that speed and parallel? It's not like people try it all the time and fail.

Except they have. Qualified pilots with thousands of hours of experience have tried it in the simulator. All have failed. Check out Pilots for 9/11 Truth. And Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. In terms of the physics of aviation, what the aircraft on 9/11 were supposed to have done is virtually impossible *even for* experienced pilots. So how do you account for the fact that an inexperienced rookie who could barely control a single-engine Cessna, could fly a commercial jet with accuracy unmatched by pilots who fly those jets every day (the physics / aviation laws of the feat aside), into a building with a margin of error of only 25 feet on either wingtip? Sorry, but no.