[joos]

Not to mention the complete lack of the engines or wings. Did they ever find the black box for this flight? A lot of overly mysterious bullshit with this whole event. IF we're to believe a full size jetliner hit, then why are the videos that were confiscated from all surrounding CCs still not released to the public? What could you possibly have to hide from a very public event like this if it really was just a jetliner flying across the sky and smashing into the ground? I mean, we've got tons of video of planes hitting towers.

I don't claim to know either way, but there is a lot of fishiness surrounding this particular event. I also don't recall seeing any seats or bodies, etc. on the other one that smashed into the ground.

[Sharon]

Amazing collection of images

[bdc3427]

So the whole twin towers fell as a result of burning jet fuel, but that cabinet didnt? Lol ok surrrre

[jaybo]

Originally Posted by decap ↗

chris, do you think it was a plane that hit the pentagon?

lol seriously, come on get a grip

[jaybo]

Originally Posted by bdc3427 ↗

So the whole twin towers fell as a result of burning jet fuel, but that cabinet didnt? Lol ok surrrre

Two different buildings, not a direct hit

[jaybo]

Originally Posted by joos ↗

Not to mention the complete lack of the engines or wings. Did they ever find the black box for this flight? A lot of overly mysterious bullshit with this whole event. IF we're to believe a full size jetliner hit, then why are the videos that were confiscated from all surrounding CCs still not released to the public? What could you possibly have to hide from a very public event like this if it really was just a jetliner flying across the sky and smashing into the ground? I mean, we've got tons of video of planes hitting towers.

I don't claim to know either way, but there is a lot of fishiness surrounding this particular event. I also don't recall seeing any seats or bodies, etc. on the other one that smashed into the ground.

You don't claim? There is so much evidence that it was a plane do your homework and not on you tube sites

[jaybo]

Originally Posted by L1v1ngD3ad ↗

I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but there seems to be a lack of plane pieces that you would normally see during a massive crash, and more day-to-day office and building materials like desks, copiers, chairs, etc., that are being shown. Are certain things still being hidden from us? Anyone can take pics of plane parts on a piece of grass. Is there more to come? This post is great, but the government pics just leaves me with more questions, especially after the last shot, the overhead one....

It must be tues. the day the government doesn't give you everything thing you need to ease you mind

[jaybo]

Originally Posted by chris ↗

These pictures were released today by the FBI in reference to the terror attack on the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. These images have not been released prior.

I think it's good see the FBI releasing these, as previously they have released very little documented evidence about the Pentagon attack. Some of you may remember that video they released that showed a few seconds of the plane hitting the building, which did nothing be add to suspicion by conspiracy theorists about the incident.

Chris they could have had an on board go pro streaming as it crash and the conspiracists would think of something to talk about

[dwizzy22]

Originally Posted by ianmd3000 ↗

I actually wasn't being (very) sarcastic...maybe a little about the holographic plane.

I'm not buying the "official" story, though.

I know nothing ads up

[><0300><]

Originally Posted by hunterseeker ↗

you try flying 500 mph right into a building/ground, there isn't much left you dummy

Umm.... Try flying a passenger plane into the building at that speed, no torn up ground, and where is the damage to the facade from the engines/wings​?

Again, even though you groaned me for bringing up a valid point, your reply is to call others 'dummy'.

Act like an adult and have a debate, not like a child who acts out if it's not their way.