|
#1
●
09-01-2013, 03:02 PM
|
 My Rank: MAJOR Poster Rank:12 Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 93,062
Contributions: 239
93,062Posts 137,766Thanked 2,009Quoted 91Mentioned 239Contrib. |
|
X Ray of Quadruplets in Utero, 1947
  · |
|
#2
●
09-01-2013, 06:27 PM
|
 My Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS Poster Rank:4240 Female Join Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 72 72Posts 78Thanked 10Quoted 0Mentioned 0Contrib. |
|
Re: X Ray of Quadruplets in Utero, 1947
Carrying one baby is bad enough, I can't begin to imagine how uncomfortable 4 is.  |
|
#3
●
09-02-2013, 08:40 AM
|
| So Fucking Banned Poster Rank:672 Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 1,299 1,299Posts 2,098Thanked 267Quoted 14Mentioned 0Contrib. |
|
Re: X Ray of Quadruplets in Utero, 1947
however when a woman is pregnant with multiples, the individual babies are a lot smaller (sometimes dangerously so).
|
|
#4
●
09-02-2013, 10:23 PM
|
 ★ Legacy Member ★ Poster Rank:53 Join Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 28,044
Contributions: 33
28,044Posts 47,276Thanked 11,875Quoted 175Mentioned 33Contrib. |
|
Re: X Ray of Quadruplets in Utero, 1947
That creepy little face in the center, looking right at us - it's creepy!!  very cool post!! |
|
#6
●
09-03-2013, 04:17 PM
|
| My Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS Poster Rank:4240 Female Join Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 72 72Posts 78Thanked 10Quoted 0Mentioned 0Contrib. |
|
Re: X Ray of Quadruplets in Utero, 1947
appreciated, but with extra fluid and extra movements, it's bound to be far different than carrying only one.
|
