|
#71
●
04-22-2021, 04:59 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: MAJOR Poster Rank:95 Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 16,772 Mentioned: 261 Post(s) Quoted: 8276 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Chauvin Trial
That is your opinion. I'm guessing you follow information sources that align with your views. Since you said the "rest of the world". Because there's millions and millions of people who see it just as I see it. And no, I don't believe Chauvin suffocated Floyd. Because I saw absolutely zero evidence to support that. You are using emotions to make a conclusion. You have no real idea if Floyd would have died anyway. You're completely ignoring his actions, his demeanor during his arrest. He was in a crazed state, he just swallowed drugs in an attempt to hide them from police. Once you're over the lethal amount, you are over a lethal amount. Sure, he has tolerance. But people have died from having 25% of what Floyd had in his system. People have died taking the same amount they took the day before. So it's impossible to say the drugs didn't kill him. Because it is certainly possible. |
|
#72
●
04-22-2021, 05:18 PM
| ||||||||
 ☾ Administrator ☽ Poster Rank:77 ஜᎻᎬᎩᎾᏦᎪஜ Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 19,445
Contributions: 32
Mentioned: 169 Post(s) Quoted: 6803 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Chauvin Trial
^^^  This is not about any sides but the facts. And that’s what side I’m on. Your the only one bring up left/right when I’m trying to suggest looking at this completely objectively. No bias, no race, no politics. One human’s actions on another human. I give up. There’s no hope you will put pride and politics aside and see the facts as they are before you. 
__________________ 💜🧿See Human | Be Human🧿💜 (War Section Hashtags) |
|
#73
●
04-22-2021, 05:31 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: MAJOR Poster Rank:95 Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 16,772 Mentioned: 261 Post(s) Quoted: 8276 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Chauvin Trial
 That's hilarious. But unsurprising. It's you people's go to, you think you're more intelligent. Because all you follow, all you entertain is mainstream media. Biased media? That's also hilarious. You mean like cnn? Sure, I hear lots of biased news. From CNN, most of the mainstream outlets. That's the problem, this is why you're thinking in a little box. The mainstream media is biased. And many people like yourself think they're not. But just watch. It might take a couple years. But I bet his verdict gets thrown out. And I bet that 3rd degree charge is one of the reasons why. And when he's retried, it will be without that charge. My narrative is the truth. Yours is based on systemic racism, yours is based on the color of everyone's skin. Why else is Chauvin such a monster in your eyes? And Floyd is not. If we're being honest, they're both better off out of society. So please, do your best at insulting the shit out of my intelligence. You seem pretty good at making assumptions and pretending you're more intelligent. But declaring yourself smart and me dumb is hardly any kind of accomplishment, I think anyone can do that. |
|
#74
●
04-22-2021, 05:54 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: CORPORAL Poster Rank:1553 C21-H30-O2 Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 362
Contributions: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 100 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Chauvin Trial
Everyone's watching. We can watch and still accept the verdict. You do not possess more knowledge on this case than those 12 jurors. Not I, not you. Truth is, Chauvin lost. Blame it on whatever, but dude be GUILTY. The twelve jurors could have been snorting meth off a bailiff's ass, but in the interest of all they got the problem solved. And the verdict is guilty.  |
|
#75
●
04-22-2021, 07:48 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: MAJOR Poster Rank:95 Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 16,772 Mentioned: 261 Post(s) Quoted: 8276 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Chauvin Trial
I never said I did have more knowledge. But I do have something really important that they didn't. Peace of mind. I don't have to worry that I will have to move after my decision. I don't have to worry that I will be a target of violence because of my decision. Protesters aren't going to be at my home, my work, my entire life isn't turned upside down. You can point to the verdict all day long. In my opinion the verdict is injustice, not justice. They had two choices, guilty, or explain why they're racist. Everyday they went to a courthouse that looked like a maximum security prison, with all the fences, check points, and heavily armed police. They lived through the months of riots, saw the police had no control, if the mob wanted to do something, they did it. Many of them likely they themselves, or knew someone who was ordered or asked to leave their homes by the police because they were told, we cannot protect you, we will not come if you dial 911. I don't understand why you would ignore that. As if that has no affect on the verdict, when it obviously does. I realize the media chose to ignore it, the media ignored many things throughout the trial. The media ignored the entire defense argument. So I understand people who just follow mainstream media, or left wing media, have this, "how could you not convict" attitude. Because they haven't seen a defense. So I accept what the jury decided, because I'm not a hypocrite. But on the other hand, I have a feeling that if some jurors were to be honest, they'd say they felt like they had a gun to their head, and only 1 decision would guarantee that gun wouldn't harm them. Certainly you can be honest. And imagine what would happen if they said not guilty on the two murder charges and guilty on manslaughter, or not guilty on all counts. Or, more likely, the jury was split. And there's no doubt the names of the jury would have been released. Knowing that your name would become public, and the entire world would know it, you really think you would do what you know would piss off that mob ? Our standard is the highest standard in the world. You can't just believe it's possible, or that probably he's guilty. The standard is you have to know 100% for sure, without any reasonable doubt. And that's where I call bs. Because there is reasonable doubt. |
|
#76
●
04-22-2021, 08:29 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: CORPORAL Poster Rank:1553 C21-H30-O2 Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 362
Contributions: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 100 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Chauvin Trial
I'm not ignoring that. I do know for a fact the process that vets potential jurors is very thorough. If anyone could have handled sitting on a jury in this case, it is these 12 in this case. That much I am confident in. Why? Because if the Jurors really gave a fuck about what everyone else thought, they knew they would lose either way. Either they'd be racists, or they'd be race-baited pussies who tapped to blm. What makes you think they gave a fuck either way anyways? The names of the Jurors would be released at the pleasure of the presiding Judge. The Judiciary chills the media all the time for all cases. Otherwise, I agree. The floyd riots would have been a bbq compared to the thankfully avoided chauvin riots. But that's another issue really. They are going to riot anyways, Chauvin just gave them an excuse. |
|
#77
●
04-22-2021, 10:51 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: MAJOR Poster Rank:95 Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 16,772 Mentioned: 261 Post(s) Quoted: 8276 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Chauvin Trial
All one needs to do to know that the mainstream media is completely full of shit, and biased against Chauvin so much that they hid and brushed off important evidence and important information. I'd look at the latest media frenzy over a police shooting of a teenage "black", girl. Because, ya know, the victim must be black, or they won't report it. NBC, reported the "story". Edited the 911 call. Where all you hear is the caller saying "we need the police over here now". They didn't play the part where the caller said a girl has a knife and there's a fight. Then they show the body cam footage, and they only show a small clip, and they blur out the girls face, and they blur out the knife. And, you guessed it. Didn't say the girl was actually in the process of putting a knife into another teenage girl when she was shot. So that's your mainstream media, that's how they roll. And people have the nerve to call other media sources biased. When the msm have become completely worthless as a factual information source. Even 10-20 years ago, "journalists" would get fired. But now this is standard cnn NBC, ABC ect standard practice. It used to be they had to tell the entire story for it to be considered truthful. Now they can leave whatever they wish out. Which makes it a lie. But technically, they didn't say anything that was made up, they just don't say things in the correct order, or leave things out. And their newest form of disinformation and dishonesty is, fsct checking eachother. And we see that here all the time, someone linking a fact checking source. But they are bs, because they are all working together. Another aspect of this is sources. It used to be they had to have multiple sources to verify authenticity. Well, since they all work together now. 1 source will tell its information to CNN, then to tell it to ABC. And then they'll use eachother to "fact check", the authenticity. They'll say something like "CNN has reported and now has been verified by ABC News. When it hasn't. It's the same fucking person telling both of them. It sucks that Trump was the messenger, because he's obviously not the best messenger. But he was right about fake news, he was right about them being the enemy of the people. |
|
#78
●
04-22-2021, 10:56 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: MAJOR Poster Rank:95 Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 16,772 Mentioned: 261 Post(s) Quoted: 8276 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Chauvin Trial
And not far from that shooting of a girl in the process of attempted murder. Was another incident involving two 13 year old black girls. And 1 of them had a knife and stabbed the other to death. But you never heard that story, because the media doesn't care about a 13 year old black girl being killed. All they care about is their attack on police, their systemic racism narrative. If it doesn't fit that, if they can't twist it to fit that, it doesn't make the news, because they don't give a fuck. |
|
#79
●
04-22-2021, 11:22 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: GUNNERY SERGEANT Poster Rank:611 Male. Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 1,489 Mentioned: 11 Post(s) Quoted: 1176 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Chauvin Trial
This guy is Soja 2.0. They should jerk each other off while telling each other how right they always are. |
|
#80
●
04-22-2021, 11:32 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: GUNNERY SERGEANT Poster Rank:611 Male. Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 1,489 Mentioned: 11 Post(s) Quoted: 1176 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Chauvin Trial
You said Biden's quote had an impact on the jury. When presented with the fact that they did not hear it, you double down and said it did, because of other statements that other people said that weren't Biden... how does that make any sense? Just admit you were wrong. I agree that the cop that shot Ma'Khia Bryant (they have names you know) was reacting to a situation. She was attacking someone with a knife, and he took action. I do not believe it was based in racism or anything like that. I do believe there should be a way to diffuse that situation without shooting to kill. That's gives credence to the idea that police need more and better training. Rittenhouse is a fucking murderer, but I know you love defending him. Why did you put the word jogger in quotations? His fucking name is Ahmaud Arbery. He was simply jogging and he was murdered by two racist shitstains. You put jogger in quotes because you don't give a fuck about his life, because you're a fucking racist yourself. Fuck all your blathering about fake news and all that bullshit, that alone if nothing else your retarded hands have typed, proves you are a piece of shit racist and your opinions mean less than nothing. Fuck you. |
