|
#51
●
08-28-2025, 05:10 AM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: SERGEANT MAJOR Poster Rank:295 male Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 4,328 Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Quoted: 494 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Woman Who Fires First Gets Killed in Sacramento
She escalated it by going indoors for a gun, i am sure his lawyer will point that out to the judge, ideal scenario, both got unlived
|
|
#52
●
08-28-2025, 09:43 AM
| ||||||||
| ♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚ Poster Rank:346 "IT"-Species; Genus-genius Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 3,612 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 615 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Woman Who Fires First Gets Killed in Sacramento
“IN THE GHETTO “, where’s Elvis when you need him?
|
|
#53
●
08-28-2025, 01:33 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:2249 Join Date: Jul 2017 Posts: 207 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 45 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Woman Who Fires First Gets Killed in Sacramento
Classic self defense. No jury will convict and if they do they’ve revoked their own citizenship status.
|
|
#54
●
08-28-2025, 01:38 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:2249 Join Date: Jul 2017 Posts: 207 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 45 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Woman Who Fires First Gets Killed in Sacramento
He didn’t. He had no safe egress and line of sight prevented him from seeing whole picture. To get into the car and escape to safety he had to cover himself so he did by firing until he was safe in his car and then escaped. Self defense.
|
|
#55
●
08-28-2025, 03:33 PM
| ||||||||
 ♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚ Poster Rank:130 Happy Happy Happy Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 12,420 Mentioned: 20 Post(s) Quoted: 4095 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Woman Who Fires First Gets Killed in Sacramento
I heard the victim was going to school to help cure cancer
|
|
#57
●
08-28-2025, 04:51 PM
| ||||||||
 ★ Legacy Member ★ Poster Rank:180 USA haters keep sucking the big orange dick! Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 8,369 Mentioned: 9 Post(s) Quoted: 2717 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Woman Who Fires First Gets Killed in Sacramento
|
|
#59
●
08-28-2025, 11:43 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:2765 Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 147 Mentioned: 3 Post(s) Quoted: 97 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Woman Who Fires First Gets Killed in Sacramento
"In California, the first aggressor rule, or "initial aggressor" rule, states that a person who starts a physical altercation cannot claim self-defense unless they first make a good-faith effort to stop fighting and communicate that intent to the other person, and the other person continues the fight. Alternatively, if the initial aggressor used only non-deadly force, but the other person responded with deadly force, the initial aggressor may then have the right to defend themselves with deadly force." Without previous context, it's hard to judge but I was thinking it had something to do with the first aggressor rule that California has. But then again, California does have a No Duty to Retreat rule as well. |
