|
#116
●
09-18-2025, 02:51 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:3341 Join Date: Dec 2024 Posts: 109 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 19 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Woman Who Fires First Gets Killed in Sacramento
Did the guy whistle to make hwr look up just before finishing her off? These are the cool army guys from the us hahahaha
|
|
#117
●
09-20-2025, 12:34 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:2703 Join Date: Jun 2017 Posts: 153 Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Quoted: 99 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Woman Who Fires First Gets Killed in Sacramento
Incorrect. Tell me you're an internet know-it-all without telling me you're an internet know-it-all. Reasonable. Lets discuss that. Deadly force is lawful only when a reasonable person in your situation would have believed they were about to be killed or seriously injured. Is the onus on the man shooting the woman to know she dropped her gun, or that she was an active threat to her life that needed to be "put down"? Furthermore, even after going down, she continued to fire, in this alleged "self-defense" posture you proclaim. Lastly, when you walk outside your house with a sidearm drawn to a verbal altercation, you've already declared your intent, and again, onus is not on the person having a gun pointed at them. The man killed her in self-defense. Merely dropping your gun after assaulting someone with a deadly weapon, then attempting murder, isn't NEAR grounds for self defense. When the woman approached yelling and pointing a gun, the man was legally justified to defend himself. Assault with a deadly weapon, onus is not on the man. She fired shots while already falling and down. At that point, he could reasonably still think she was an active threat. Again, onus is not on the man. |