[lackofreality]

Well yeah but they'd have to find it first.

[mickeymouse101]

Nice skills. I'd hire him to build my deck.

[DaDawg911]

*tries to put head on stomach*
"Hmmm, nope, too fat."
*places it back down on ground*

[STL172]

Unusually fast on the blade, especially given the fatty tissue that must have surrounded this lardass's gullet. Wish his eyes weren't taped so we could see them move after decapitation.

[FuManBoobs]

Originally Posted by HIGHTECHDUDE ↗

I appreciate your comments and I can understand your confusion in choosing to defend sexual predators, given that you apparently subscribe to some blatant SJW campaigns out there that are spearheaded by pseudo-intellectuals who provide subjective data sets to justify their empathetic feelings, opinions and agendas.

Although, the ‘empirical’ data delivered by psychologist Karl Hanson does demonstrate what you adroitly summed up as, “after about 10-15 years offence free are no more likely to offend than anyone else”, it does point out a glaring problem. The (pay attention now) recidivism rate only lowers after 10-15 years of no re-offense (i.e. incarceration) and never reaches absolute zero in any of the presented data sets he has collected. This is the whole argument for my concern. Although it might go down to an arguably low percentage level, there simply is no guarantee that any child molester will never prey on more victims once released. Most experts agree that it is a psychological compulsion that has to be dealt with their entire life.

Although it’s presumptive that familial victims will be sheltered and better protected against being re-violated by their attacker after release, there are no hard facts about other victims. And therein lies the rub, because statistically 20%, that’s one in every five children in the western world, will be molested by a complete stranger. And, for obvious reasons the vast majority of these offenders escape apprehension.

In western society, pedophiles typically serve prison sentences of 10-15 years for a first conviction, but statistically pedophiles arrested for the first time have actually been molesting multiple victims over many years prior to apprehension, a fact never mentioned by Hanson. Due to numerous factors, these molesters are seldom punished for all of their crimes.

Also in comparison, look at the sheer volume of victims in the Catholic priest and Boy Scout lawsuits who were abused repeated for years by these types of individuals while kept as a dirty secret. Not to mention the numerous ongoing teachers, coaches, day care guardians, etc. arrested almost daily in America that seldom make it to the headlines in MSM. The pre-incarceration re-offense rates are conveniently left out of Hanson’s analysis.

So, prison obviously slows down the ability to re-offend while incarcerated (duh). Even when isolated from the general prison population, new child molesters are abused by other inmates on almost a daily basis. I imagine that getting your mud packed by another child molester on a regular basis for 10-15 years might tend to take some of the gusto out of reoffending. (As an aside, I’ve investigated weirdos who actually enjoy it, but I digress).

California and a few other states found that in spite of these skewed statistics spouted by psychologists, any amount of recidivism from child molesters is intolerable in our society, and they choose to chemically castrate many re-offenders as a condition of release. But, trust me, it doesn’t fix their sexual paraphilia. These people are permanently damaged monsters.

So, let me also point out that in the salient video, this molester had been raping three children for quite a while. One of which was his own daughter. There are no reliable stats pertaining to the actual amount of molestation and pedophilia in the third world, but suffice to say by all accounts it is literally out of control. And, we see how the locals deal out justice that the governments quite simply want to ignore.

IMHO, the bottom line is, the longer these offenders go unchecked, the deeper their desires and compulsions. They're in essence completely addicted. Unless swift justice is carried out on child molesters upon initial discovery, they will continue to reoffend until they are physically stopped, by either incarceration and severe abuse for a very long time, or killed. I’m a proponent of the latter. Quite honestly, I feel it is far more humane.

If you think that killing a consanguineous child molester unnecessarily inflicts undue guilt on their already damaged victims, then I suppose they can go visit your Dr. Karl Hanson for therapy. Most children will naturally grow out of any guilty feelings once they reach maturity and realize they were victims and didn't do anything wrong. For the rest of the community, at least the monster is gone and incapable of inflicting harm on anyone ever again, making the world a better place.

I encourage you to view the movie "Sound of Freedom." It may enlighten you.

Right, don't trust the guy who invented the tools for these offences, trust "my" sources. Good one.

There is no guarantee that ANYONE won't commit an offence. The stats show, despite people being upset by it, that the rates do drop(of offenders living OUTSIDE of prison).

But of course facts can't always get through to people basing their beliefs on emotions. Like why does it matter what else I say? Why bring up SJWs? Now read carefully, who brainwashed you to believe fighting for social justice was a bad thing?

The fact remains that very few sexual offenders re-offend despite claims to the contrary. There are a low number that have many victims, which, and read carefully, pushes the numbers up. Those priests and coaches etc. are the cases where many victims are seen.

If you have 1 offender with 100 victims and 1 offender with 1 victim, what's the average amount of victims per offender? And there you have it.

There are also a plethora of cases where offenders acted in their college years and then ceased offending. These are what contribute to some of the cases that never see the light of day. So despite your claims of it being a life long issue it's clearly not the case or there would be an even greater number of offenders being constantly being caught.

I'm not against killing people if they can't be stopped in some other way, but as far as I know the country where this happened does have some kind of jail system...as most countries do. Killing people when other options are available isn't beneficial to societal health and well being.

It may satiate the desire for revenge but it comes at a huge cost.

Lack of due process: Vigilantes do not follow the proper legal procedures and protections afforded to individuals accused of crimes. This can lead to unjust punishment or retaliation without proper investigation and trial.

Potential for abuse: Vigilantism gives individuals the power to decide what is right or wrong, opening the door for personal biases, agendas, and excessive use of force. This can result in innocent people being targeted or punished disproportionately.

Undermining the rule of law: When citizens start taking the law into their own hands, it undermines the authority and credibility of the formal justice system. This can lead to a breakdown of the rule of law and social order.

Potential for escalation: Vigilante actions can provoke retaliation or counter-vigilantism, creating a cycle of retribution and violence that can spiral out of control.

Lack of accountability: Vigilantes are not bound by the same checks and balances as law enforcement and the judicial system, making them less accountable for their actions.

The list goes on.

Dehumanising any criminal leads down dark roads. Cheering the behaviour on won't lead to better societies, just more of the same. It doesn't even address the underlying problems. You essentially say that "this will scare others not to do it" and yet also say "it's a compulsion that can't be cured".

There are pedophiles who live without ever committing an offence, just as there are psychopaths who live without harming others. Social media has pushed emotion over education in these areas(and others) so much that it's now much harder to objectively look at the facts and data. Appeals to emotion can be good, but it can also get in the way of solving these issues in better ways than being a vigilante or making unsupported laws like chemical castration that we know don't work but placate the emotional among us.

[AngelAssassin]

Originally Posted by FuManBoobs ↗

Right, don't trust the guy who invented the tools for these offences, trust "my" sources. Good one.

There is no guarantee that ANYONE won't commit an offence. The stats show, despite people being upset by it, that the rates do drop(of offenders living OUTSIDE of prison).

But of course facts can't always get through to people basing their beliefs on emotions. Like why does it matter what else I say? Why bring up SJWs? Now read carefully, who brainwashed you to believe fighting for social justice was a bad thing?

The fact remains that very few sexual offenders re-offend despite claims to the contrary. There are a low number that have many victims, which, and read carefully, pushes the numbers up. Those priests and coaches etc. are the cases where many victims are seen.

If you have 1 offender with 100 victims and 1 offender with 1 victim, what's the average amount of victims per offender? And there you have it.

There are also a plethora of cases where offenders acted in their college years and then ceased offending. These are what contribute to some of the cases that never see the light of day. So despite your claims of it being a life long issue it's clearly not the case or there would be an even greater number of offenders being constantly being caught.

I'm not against killing people if they can't be stopped in some other way, but as far as I know the country where this happened does have some kind of jail system...as most countries do. Killing people when other options are available isn't beneficial to societal health and well being.

It may satiate the desire for revenge but it comes at a huge cost.

Lack of due process: Vigilantes do not follow the proper legal procedures and protections afforded to individuals accused of crimes. This can lead to unjust punishment or retaliation without proper investigation and trial.

Potential for abuse: Vigilantism gives individuals the power to decide what is right or wrong, opening the door for personal biases, agendas, and excessive use of force. This can result in innocent people being targeted or punished disproportionately.

Undermining the rule of law: When citizens start taking the law into their own hands, it undermines the authority and credibility of the formal justice system. This can lead to a breakdown of the rule of law and social order.

Potential for escalation: Vigilante actions can provoke retaliation or counter-vigilantism, creating a cycle of retribution and violence that can spiral out of control.

Lack of accountability: Vigilantes are not bound by the same checks and balances as law enforcement and the judicial system, making them less accountable for their actions.

The list goes on.

Dehumanising any criminal leads down dark roads. Cheering the behaviour on won't lead to better societies, just more of the same. It doesn't even address the underlying problems. You essentially say that "this will scare others not to do it" and yet also say "it's a compulsion that can't be cured".

There are pedophiles who live without ever committing an offence, just as there are psychopaths who live without harming others. Social media has pushed emotion over education in these areas(and others) so much that it's now much harder to objectively look at the facts and data. Appeals to emotion can be good, but it can also get in the way of solving these issues in better ways than being a vigilante or making unsupported laws like chemical castration that we know don't work but placate the emotional among us.

Again, I am asking you, could you just change who you are sexually attracted to?

Could you change from being attracted to women to being attracted to men?

It’s a genetic process. There’s no possible way to ‘rehabilitate’ your sexual preference.
I’m sorry, but it is impossible to change that.
Nothing can change your genetic makeup.
Nothing.

[tater13]

So that's why all of them are coming to america

[K53]

Appears to be well deserved

[AnubisCannabiss]

I like his shoes