[Superdude4411]

Originally Posted by Jarrao ↗

Your statements are not correct for several reasons.

First, acts of violence in the Bible are presented in a descriptive manner, not as instructions. This is comparable to listening to a true crime podcast that describes how someone was killed and then claiming that it is calling for violence.

Second, many people make the mistake of comparing the books to one another. However, the Qur’an cannot be compared to the Bible at all, because Christians do not regard the Bible itself as sacred, but merely as a piece of paper, and they do not claim that it is free of error. For this reason, it is also not a major issue for Christians if the Bible is burned, because it is simply a book written by humans.

The Qur’an, by contrast, has a transcendent character, since Muslims assume that God’s word has passed from the immaterial realm into the physical world through this book.

Therefore, the Bible cannot be compared to the Qur’an, but rather the Qur’an should be compared to Jesus Christ, because Jesus reflects precisely this idea, namely that God came to earth in the form of Jesus.

One should therefore not fall for this narrative of comparing the two books in this way.

WRONG. Entirely wrong.

[Superdude4411]

(Dunno why the site keeps cutting off this reply)
Reply to Jarrao



WRONG. Entirely wrong. ������������*♂️ Bruh. You’re clearly NOT a Christian, and know nothing about it. Christians don’t hold the Bible as sacred? Are you retarded or just willingly uneducated? As Christians, we literally take the Bible as the word of God. It was transcribed by man, not written by man. God is still the author. What error do you speak of? There aren’t any errors, and it’s not regarded as “just a piece of paper”. Christian’s would most definitely be upset if the Bible was burned. ������������*♂️ You’re either trolling, or just strangely trying to speak about something you’re not educated in.

If by “error”, you mean there are places in the Bible that don’t necessarily have the same exact minor details of certain things. They all still speak about the same story in general. For example, if there was a car accident right outside a store you were at, several witnesses. One person might say, “Oh the guy was wearing a red shirt and driving a blue car at noon.” While another person says, “Well I think he was wearing an orange shirt, driving a teal car around 10am.” Point being, they all agree and confirm the main fact, there was an accident. Same with the Bible. Different stories from different perspectives, all share the same main points. Which actually proves it even more. If it were written by different people and all said the exact same thing, it’d sort of prove it was all written based off earlier texts, or some sort of a master “copy”, and not based off the memory and actual accounts from witnesses.
Lastly, you mention that it is only mentioned as descriptions and not instructions in regard to acts of violence. Wrong again. Two times, first one, in the book of Genesis, God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac. That was a clear instruction. Though he wound up having him NOT sacrifice his son, because he proved his faith by almost doing it. It was still instructed and not just described. In Luke 22, Jesus explicitly tells his disciples to buy a sword if they don’t have one, because of how dangerous it will be as a Christian after Christ is crucified.
It’s ok though, kiddo. You have every right to be as wrong as you are. I’d recommend doing some better research, and actually read the Bible, if you want engage in debates about it. Because NONE of what you said about Christians is true.

[DinoRex27]

Originally Posted by MentallyUnstable ↗

The guy who disarmed one of the shooters should have pulled the trigger on him. I get it, he might not have realised there were two, or he just might not be a person who wants to kill, but that guy was still a threat and if he's up to disarming him he really should have just ended the cunt.

Seriously at the very least shoot him in the kneecaps! Instead he let him go back and grab another weapon and got himself shot.

[StrategicNuclearMoose]

Originally Posted by DinoRex27 ↗

Seriously at the very least shoot him in the kneecaps! Instead he let him go back and grab another weapon and got himself shot.

The weapon was out of ammunition

[StrategicNuclearMoose]

Dashcam footage showing the Bondi Beach attackers car with an ISIS flag draped over the windshield, and their first two victims being shot. Sorry about the watermark, couldn't find one without.

[dreamsneverend]

Originally Posted by mr_feelgood ↗

Lol. Migrant crime

That's all of Australia except for the indigenous folks.

[capratt]

Dude who disarmed him has absolute balls of steel. Also the police shouldve let the guy from the second vid keep stomping that piece of human shit’s head in.

[IW RIOT]

Originally Posted by Royal_Madnessty ↗

What do beach goers in Australia have to do with Israel you fucking retard.

This shit didn't happen in a vacuum no, go read the Quran and find out why muzzies are obsessed with Jews.

What kind of dumbass comment is that? It was a Jewish holiday event. Gee I wonder what that means? Muslims attacking Jews. The genocide in Gaza ring any bells? It's retribution and those 2 groups will not stop killing each other. Has been that way since the crusades

[IW RIOT]

Originally Posted by Yanni ↗

lol.

how utterly full of shit can one be.

Full of shit? Damn where have you been? Take out a book and read the history of Muslims and Jews. They have been at war for a long time. Committing genocide against a group of people will almost guarantee a target on your back. If you wanna live in delusional land you're welcome to, but you can't change historical facts.

[capratt]

Originally Posted by IW RIOT ↗

What kind of dumbass comment is that? It was a Jewish holiday event. Gee I wonder what that means? Muslims attacking Jews. The genocide in Gaza ring any bells? It's retribution and those 2 groups will not stop killing each other. Has been that way since the crusades

Yeah but it still doesnt warrant them killing innocent Australians