JavaScript and Cookies are required to view this site. Please enable both in your browser settings.
A Bald Chinese Guy With A Scooter Battery In An Elevator In China - Section 12

Go Back  

A Bald Chinese Guy With A Scooter Battery In An Elevator In China 

Current Rating:

Join NowJoin Now
 
  #111  
Old 08-08-2024, 07:37 PM
gimlet's Avatar
gimlet
Offline:
♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚
Poster Rank:183
Glitter is the herpes of the craft world
Join Date: Mar 2010
 
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Quoted: 2547 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
7/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss7748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mongolian60 View Post
Man that takes Crispy Fried Peking Duck to whole new level. I wonder if they charge extra for sauce too.
No, but McDonalds the world over are experiencing outages of sweet & sour Chicken McNugget sauce. Seems people everywhere are eating lithium battery fire victims because they are free and already cooked/ready to eat, just need some seasoning / McNugget sauce.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gimlet For This Useful Post:
terrence
  #112  
Old 08-12-2024, 04:38 PM
terrence
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:2195
Join Date: Aug 2009
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
4/20 17/20
Today Posts
1/11 ssssss206
News

A video of an electric bicycle battery exploding in an elevator has been widely circulated recently, giving many netizens a "warning lesson." It is understood that the Guangdong man who was severely burned at the time unfortunately died 26 days later despite being rescued. After identification, the exploded battery was an illegal secondary processing modified battery, and the family of the deceased was compensated more than 1.01 million yuan (RMB, the same below, approximately US$140,000). Netizens said, "It's so scary. Don't bring the battery into the house."

People's Daily Online reported that the incident occurred on October 8, 2021, in a residential area in Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province. A 58-year-old resident, Chen N., walked into the elevator carrying a battery. As soon as he pressed the door close button, the battery exploded. Before going out, the man told his wife that the battery was hot and he planned to take it outside to cool down. Unexpectedly, the tragedy happened as soon as he entered the elevator. The accident determination report from the fire department showed that the cause of the fire was thermal runaway of the lithium battery of the electric bicycle.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to terrence For This Useful Post:
owlguy77, Ozymandias
  #113  
Old 08-12-2024, 04:42 PM
terrence
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:2195
Join Date: Aug 2009
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
4/20 17/20
Today Posts
1/11 ssssss206
More News

The family later sued the electric vehicle production company, the seller and the community property company, claiming more than 1.49 million yuan.

The Guangzhou Haizhu District People's Court held that the production company and property company involved in the case should not be liable for compensation, and that the deceased himself violated the rules for using electric vehicles by taking the battery home to charge, which was at fault and should bear corresponding liability.

The court ruled that Zhang N., who sells electric vehicles, bears 70% of the responsibility for the accident, and the deceased Chen N. bears 30% of the responsibility. Zhang N. must pay more than 1.01 million yuan in compensation.

The evidence shows that the product certificate and instructions for use attached to the vehicle were issued by Company A, and the battery stated on the product certificate was produced by Company B. After identification by the court, the exploded battery was an illegal secondary processing modified battery and was inconsistent with the comparison sample. Therefore, the exploded battery involved in the case was not produced by Company B. At the same time, the battery sold by Company A for electric bicycles was not the battery involved in the case. Therefore, neither Company A nor Company B should be liable for compensation.

The property management company of the community rescued Chen N. from the elevator about 7 minutes after the accident. There was no problem that the rescue was not timely, and it should not be liable for compensation.

Zhang N. appealed, and the second instance was dismissed and the original verdict was upheld.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to terrence For This Useful Post:
Bletch, Ozymandias
  #114  
Old 08-14-2024, 01:59 PM
Morkskog
Offline:
My Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS
Poster Rank:4754
Male
Join Date: Feb 2011
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 16/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss57
The paramedic:

- I think he might still be alive, so I will proceed to take a picture.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Morkskog For This Useful Post:
Bletch, terrence
  #115  
Old 08-14-2024, 03:41 PM
Bletch's Avatar
Bletch
Online
Warhol had AIDS
Poster Rank:112
Male
Join Date: Feb 2010
 
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Quoted: 3499 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
5/20 17/20
Today Posts
1/11 ssss13196
Quote:
Originally Posted by terrence View Post
More News

The family later sued the electric vehicle production company, the seller and the community property company, claiming more than 1.49 million yuan.

The Guangzhou Haizhu District People's Court held that the production company and property company involved in the case should not be liable for compensation, and that the deceased himself violated the rules for using electric vehicles by taking the battery home to charge, which was at fault and should bear corresponding liability.

The court ruled that Zhang N., who sells electric vehicles, bears 70% of the responsibility for the accident, and the deceased Chen N. bears 30% of the responsibility. Zhang N. must pay more than 1.01 million yuan in compensation.

The evidence shows that the product certificate and instructions for use attached to the vehicle were issued by Company A, and the battery stated on the product certificate was produced by Company B. After identification by the court, the exploded battery was an illegal secondary processing modified battery and was inconsistent with the comparison sample. Therefore, the exploded battery involved in the case was not produced by Company B. At the same time, the battery sold by Company A for electric bicycles was not the battery involved in the case. Therefore, neither Company A nor Company B should be liable for compensation.

The property management company of the community rescued Chen N. from the elevator about 7 minutes after the accident. There was no problem that the rescue was not timely, and it should not be liable for compensation.

Zhang N. appealed, and the second instance was dismissed and the original verdict was upheld.
This reassures my confidence in Chinese products
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bletch For This Useful Post:
Ozymandias, terrence
  #116  
Old 08-15-2024, 03:03 AM
monkuar's Avatar
monkuar
Offline:
My Rank: CORPORAL
Poster Rank:1560
Join Date: Jun 2009
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss347
shit like this really makes me believe life is just a big RNG based game
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to monkuar For This Useful Post:
terrence
  #117  
Old 08-17-2024, 01:04 AM
DinoRex27's Avatar
DinoRex27
Offline:
My Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS
Poster Rank:4016
Join Date: Sep 2016
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 9/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss77
Quote:
Originally Posted by wxeye View Post
It is amazing that with all the batteries that are transported by plane that no big fire like this has ever happened. Sure, some small battery fires but not like this.
Most are not transported by plane except for in special cargo areas supposedly designed with li ion storage in mind and proper labeling and certain capacity limits (mah) for totals. But with third world countries lying about specs and what things do or don’t have lithium ion cells in them I imagine at some point we will here of a mail flight going down. Some of the batteries in the scooters and bikes hold massive for there size amounts of energy. What’s our local fire departments doing to combat this scenario in a bad wreck? Also does the greater hunk of dense mass in an all EV lead to more devastating impacts at highway speeds? Some of the sedans weigh more than you’d think for their size even with using less overall metal components due to having practically a giant prism of dense explodable material. And water only makes worse.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DinoRex27 For This Useful Post:
terrence
  #118  
Old 08-17-2024, 02:42 AM
Lynex
Offline:
So Fucking Banned
Poster Rank:20094
Join Date: Mar 2023
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 2/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssssss3
Quote:
Originally Posted by terrence View Post
News

A video of an electric bicycle battery exploding in an elevator has been widely circulated recently, giving many netizens a "warning lesson." It is understood that the Guangdong man who was severely burned at the time unfortunately died 26 days later despite being rescued. After identification, the exploded battery was an illegal secondary processing modified battery, and the family of the deceased was compensated more than 1.01 million yuan (RMB, the same below, approximately US$30,000). Netizens said, "It's so scary. Don't bring the battery into the house."

People's Daily Online reported that the incident occurred on October 8, 2021, in a residential area in Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province. A 58-year-old resident, Chen N., walked into the elevator carrying a battery. As soon as he pressed the door close button, the battery exploded. Before going out, the man told his wife that the battery was hot and he planned to take it outside to cool down. Unexpectedly, the tragedy happened as soon as he entered the elevator. The accident determination report from the fire department showed that the cause of the fire was thermal runaway of the lithium battery of the electric bicycle.
1.01 million RMB, which is approximately equivalent to 140,000 US dollars, not 30,000.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lynex For This Useful Post:
terrence
  #119  
Old 08-17-2024, 06:47 PM
bando21's Avatar
bando21
Offline:
My Rank: MASTER GUNNERY SERGEANT
Poster Rank:312
male
Join Date: Nov 2009
 
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Quoted: 407 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
2/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss3931
Evil
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bando21 For This Useful Post:
terrence
  #120  
Old 08-18-2024, 07:49 PM
Paupercool1's Avatar
Paupercool1
Offline:
My Rank: PRIVATE
Poster Rank:5855
female
Join Date: Oct 2009
 
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
1/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss39
Quote:
Originally Posted by nudibranches646 View Post
That battery had been patiently waiting to do that its entire life.
It seemed a bit personal lol
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paupercool1 For This Useful Post:
terrence

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO