|
#42
●
09-01-2009, 05:40 AM
|
|
Re: Female Circumcision
But when guy get circumcised, he has his foreskin removed. But when they do a so-called circumcision on a girl, they don't just take her foreskin (aka clitoral HOOD), they take her whole clit, it's shaft, and inner labia (lips). So....by comparison, that'd be the equivalent of some old guys hold down a screaming little boy and taking those same dull, rusty, filthy little knives and chopping off a boy's whole cock, or at the very least the head of it.....then just letting the stump heal, and burning like hell every time he peed....Oh yeah, and he will never have a hard on or feel a thing down there, just like the girls. Does that sound about right & equal? |
|
#45
●
09-16-2009, 09:32 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: SERGEANT Poster Rank:939 mail Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 779 Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Quoted: 100 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Female Circumcision
The so-called health benefits of male circumcision are fabricated bullshit. It makes as much sense as cutting off your ears so you don't have to clean behind them every time you shower. It can't be that beneficial if only 20% of the world does it. As for religious reasons, Jews aren't required to be circumcised, and the trend was started in America by a worthless ****** piece of shit known as J.H. Kellogg, claiming the operation would prevent the "evil sin/potentially lethal act" of masturbation (which it doesn't). Kellogg also recommended applying acid to the clitoris so women wouldn't enjoy sexual stimulation (COUGH COUGH....) People who cry about female genital mutilation but COMPLETELY condone the male equivalent are fucking deluded and need to educate themselves. Yes, I know when it's done to females it's more barbaric and unsanitary, but they're both violations of basic human rights, and you can't deny that fact. |