|
#21
●
08-28-2014, 12:32 AM
|
|
Re: Baby With Harlequin Icthyosis
What pisses me off is that there are nutjobs who post videos of babies with HI and explain that the condition is a result of depleted uranium the US puts into its shells in combat situations. I love to remind the fuckwads who post that conspiracy bullshit that the first case of HI was reported in the US in 1750
|
|
#25
●
08-28-2014, 11:52 AM
|
|
Re: Baby With Harlequin Icthyosis
Nobody survives it when its as severe as these pictures. Heartbreaking isnt it? |
|
#27
●
08-28-2014, 01:31 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:8720 Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 19 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 3 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Baby With Harlequin Icthyosis
As a woman that's the thing that terrifies me most about pregnancy. Seeing the number of kids born with it, means it probably can't be detected before birth.
|
|
#30
●
08-28-2014, 10:31 PM
| ||||||||
| So Fucking Banned Poster Rank:1407 Female Join Date: Feb 2013 Posts: 418 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 35 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Baby With Harlequin Icthyosis
The images are really something when you enlarge them. Real interesting stuff, thanks |