[turdburgler]

Are you for real? Are you going to put any effort into this at all? You accuse me of being a "fox news fruitloop" , but your not even willing to look into it for a minute?

I am citing factual information that happened, are your just sitting there trying to dismiss it as my "opinion"?

An example of "my opinion" would be that , again, in my opinion, the important stuff, moved across the border. Easy to do and worth it to those involved. The more detectable things stayed , such as the warheads. The paperwork that SAID IT EXISTED was an overcite as they TRIED to hide it, but it was FOUND.

secondly a "tested" warhead? lol wouldnt it be in pieces?
But you must be talking about this (latest resolution you have mentioned):

You caught a typo . Should have read, 'Found AND tested See how that changes it?

Look, I get it. You dont agree with it, I dont either. But dont lie, distort or omit the truth just to make your argument more valid. Just because I dont agree with it, does not mean I cant understand why it happened.

[turdburgler]

Oh didnt catch it. The Resolution you said I missed should be the 1441.
I already answered it. Iraq responed with their "declairation" of which nas Blix said they were ot being truthful, then found 3000 pages of documents that proved it AND found the 11 warhead INTACT and they tested them, in addition to the 18 that were destroyed just previous to their visit.

My "Pre-answer" in the post before yours ;

You also ignoring the fact that the U.N. found a tested warheads they determined with capable of being used for WMD's. They were not declaired on the UN weapons declairation presented by Iraq. Inspectors also reported the discovery of over 3,000 pages of weapons program documents in the home of an Iraqi citizen, suggesting an attempt to "hide" them from inspectors and apparently contradicting Iraq's earlier claim that it had no further documents to provide.

Turn your "hater-aid" off. Look at your own answers and conclusions. You dont see that your taking things out of context? Your example of

OMG !!!111!!one!11!! lets invade the country coz of 18 empty chemical warheads. And dont forget the timeline of those events.

Yet you take the event out of context AND ignore the timeline even though you mention it?

Seriously..... This is Hans Blix, isnt it. Come on, tell us the truth :D

[bmvik]

Yep , was being a little lazy there with " the document" thing. Doesnt change the fact that "its not what it seems"

[turdburgler]

Originally Posted by bmvik ↗

Yep , was being a little lazy there with " the document" thing. Doesnt change the fact that "its not what it seems"

The reality is a simple one. When you have a country that is such stratigic importance to a "war" that is currently going on around you, AND your in the middle of pissing off the whole world. The result is an easy one to figure out. Your leash gets shorter and the "reasons" carry alot more weight.

[ROYALBOY]

IF any one read the history in deep , he can discover in easy that no one fight ISLAM and win it

TAKE LESSONS FROM THE RUSSIAN , BUT HAUGHTINESS OF THE (modern world ) ARE STUPID
ALL THE WORLD WITH ALL MODERN WEPONS SINCE 10 YEARS OF FIGHTING WHAT THEY GOT ?

finger in thier ass
no more

[rob666]

Originally Posted by turdburgler ↗

Oh didnt catch it. The Resolution you said I missed should be the 1441.
I already answered it. Iraq responed with their "declairation" of which nas Blix said they were ot being truthful, then found 3000 pages of documents that proved it AND found the 11 warhead INTACT and they tested them, in addition to the 18 that were destroyed just previous to their visit.

My "Pre-answer" in the post before yours ;


Turn your "hater-aid" off. Look at your own answers and conclusions. You dont see that your taking things out of context? Your example of Yet you take the event out of context AND ignore the timeline even though you mention it?

Seriously..... This is Hans Blix, isnt it. Come on, tell us the truth :D

Again, I don't know where you get this stuff....
http://berkeley.edu/news/media/relea.../18_blix.shtml

This is what Blix thinks of the whole situation... As well as everything that was found.....

Heres part of what Colin powell told the UN while trying to get a sanction for war- "Our conservative estimate is that Iraq today has a stockpile of between 100 and 500 tons of chemical weapons agent. That is enough agent to fill 16,000 battlefield rockets"

What a complete and utter pile of shit.
To date, exactly how many tons have been found??
Not even a drop...... And that was his "conservative" estimate lol.....

^^^^^^

[rob666]

Originally Posted by turdburgler ↗

Maybe sanction was the wrong word.

How about resolution?

Resolution 660, Resolution 661, Resolution 678, Resolution 686, Resolution 687, Resolution 688, Resolution 707, Resolution 715, Resolution 986,Resolution 1284 and Resolution 1441.

All dealing with Iraq and its refusal to comply with disarmerment obligations ; weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), but also the known construction of prohibited types of missiles, the purchase and import of prohibited armamentsits responsiblity to compansate Kuwait for the invasion and ocupation in 1991.


I guess that all didnt happen then.

The UN was against it, sure. It was political posturing buy countries we were having issues with at the time. They were happy siging new warnings "resolutions". As you can tell by the number of them, they were not doing much.

You also ignoring the fact that the U.N. found a tested warheads they determined with capable of being used for WMD's. They were not declaired on the UN weapons declairation presented by Iraq. Inspectors also reported the discovery of over 3,000 pages of weapons program documents in the home of an Iraqi citizen, suggesting an attempt to "hide" them from inspectors and apparently contradicting Iraq's earlier claim that it had no further documents to provide.

1- How in the hell can you call it "political posturing" when the countrys that didn't believe the evidence turned out to be right.... Did you ever read the transcript of Powells visit to the UN? You're ignoring the biggest fact here- The reason for going in, Illegally in the opinion of Hans Blix, was for WMD's...... Powell accused Iraq of having 100-500 TONS as a conservative estimate.... there was ZERO....

And as far as bringing UN resolutions into this, Israel is currently in violation of over 60...... But that doesn't stop billions in aid from flowing in every year from America...... America even allows Jewish groups to fundraise tax free under charity status, to give to the settlements.... the settlements that are violating over 60 resolutions.... You can't have it both ways...... You can't use broken resolutions to justify an invasion, when the biggest violator on earth recieves more aid from the US than anybody.

Do you not think, both of you. That your bickering and point scoring would be better placed in the water cooler.

[turdburgler]

I was just pointing out that a reasonable person can understand how and why it happened.

Yeah, other then that, we are done (should be)