[ILDiva]

Originally Posted by bmvik ↗

yeah and Iraq and Afganistan attacked US! hahahahaha

Duh.... where do you think the Taliban that attacked us were from? I suppose you think our government was responsible for 9/11 too. You seem to think that America is to blame for everything. When did we go to war with Iraq... after 9/11, right? If America wanted a war with Iraq don't you think they would have already been over there prior to 9/11. No, the events of 9/11 are what set it in motion. Go with what your pea brain is telling you,and go on with your closed mind.

[rob666]

Originally Posted by ILDiva ↗

Duh.... where do you think the Taliban that attacked us were from? I suppose you think our government was responsible for 9/11 too. You seem to think that America is to blame for everything. When did we go to war with Iraq... after 9/11, right? If America wanted a war with Iraq don't you think they would have already been over there prior to 9/11. No, the events of 9/11 are what set it in motion. Go with what your pea brain is telling you,and go on with your closed mind.

You are an idiot.... not trying to flame you, just pointing out the obvious.... its been proven beyond proven that iraq had nothing to do with 911.... Bush even said so himself.... but you are to ignorant and and stupid to even know that.... its people like you that should not be allowed to vote..... "Yall" should read some books, watch some news besides Fox..... The fucking reason for going in was to get WMD's.... turns out there wasn't any....

[rob666]

Originally Posted by ILDiva ↗

Hey Rob.... I think you need to move over there.... seriously. You seem to like to troll me. What's your problem? Do you have a problem with women who speak their mind? I suppose you're one of those guys that think only their opinion matters. Let me tell ya Robby boy other people can voice their opinion as well.

I don't have any problem with any opinion as long as its based on established facts. How can you even have an opinion when you don't even know what is or isn't fact?
I have a problem with idiots such as yourself spouting off opinions as if they are facts IE iraq was involved in 911.
I'm not trying to troll you at all, it just seems that every thread with a middle eastern person on here your spouting ignorant ethnic insults and bullshit, and being the shit disturber I am I feel inclined to throw some back at you.

[turdburgler]

Originally Posted by rob666 ↗

You are an idiot.... not trying to flame you, just pointing out the obvious.... its been proven beyond proven that iraq had nothing to do with 911.... Bush even said so himself.... but you are to ignorant and and stupid to even know that.... its people like you that should not be allowed to vote..... "Yall" should read some books, watch some news besides Fox..... The fucking reason for going in was to get WMD's.... turns out there wasn't any....

No, not a millitary strike ordered by the government. But they were/are a safehaven for the terrorist organization that did do it. They are also the best strategic location to put a stop to this shit. WMD's was a UN thing. It allowed us entry. All Sadam had to do was play by the rules. Instead he challenged the UN and the US. He lost. It was not an "invasion" as the haters like to call it. It was more of a police action brought on by Saddam being a total asshole. All that these shitbags are fighting for now is to be able to continue their human rights violations.

[bmvik]

Originally Posted by ILDiva ↗

Duh.... where do you think the Taliban that attacked us were from? I suppose you think our government was responsible for 9/11 too. You seem to think that America is to blame for everything. When did we go to war with Iraq... after 9/11, right? If America wanted a war with Iraq don't you think they would have already been over there prior to 9/11. No, the events of 9/11 are what set it in motion. Go with what your pea brain is telling you,and go on with your closed mind.

lol so this is where you're wrong. YOU have the closed mind. I have considered all the facts however unpleasant they were at the moment of me finding them out. Kept being objective. However i have a feeling YOUR pea sized brain would fry from processing new unfamiliar information. So you just stick with your safe little closed off corner of the world. It would probably shock you to the core to start questining your own beliefs. No my friend, TRUE open-mindness is not being afraid to ask questions. And constantly learn.
There are numerous skyscrapers that burned for hours or days, never crashed, crumbled etc. WTC was built to withstand multiple jets crashing into it, just coz of how tall those buildings were made. Lrn2history. The jet fuel WILL NOT melt or weaken the tempered steel in the columns. Simple temperature physics, but i bet ya you are gonna be too lazy to look that up. What else, oh the WTC 7 - was a total implosion demo job lol , even my 5 year old pet duck can see that. Oh and WEEKS after WTC 1 and 2 were demo'ed there were pools of molten steel under the rubble, exactly where the columns were. That prevented volunteers and firefighters etc from finishing up in those areas. Heard of "thermite" thats used in demo jobs? Those areas were even seen AND photographed with airplane thermal imaging camera. And thats not even all. But i'm sorry may be i shouldnt know and mention all this info, because it doesnt prove anything. i should ask your OPEN mind oh glorious female wtf my educated opinion should be.

[rob666]

Originally Posted by turdburgler ↗

No, not a millitary strike ordered by the government. But they were/are a safehaven for the terrorist organization that did do it. They are also the best strategic location to put a stop to this shit. WMD's was a UN thing. It allowed us entry. All Sadam had to do was play by the rules. Instead he challenged the UN and the US. He lost. It was not an "invasion" as the haters like to call it. It was more of a police action brought on by Saddam being a total asshole. All that these shitbags are fighting for now is to be able to continue their human rights violations.

Where in the hell do you come up with this shit....Remember "freedom fries"?...There was NO UN SANCTION.... The WMD's was an American thing.... The UN was not and is not involved militarily.... The UN was against going in... Iraq was not a terrorist haven, Saddam didn't allow it, and there has been absolutly no evidence that al-quada was involved with Saddam...Bush even said so....
You try to make it sound like the UN and the world was behind the "police action" but in reality most of the world refused to become involved...

This is really quite facinating..... Its almost like the twilight zone lol.... So the WMD's was a UN thing that allowed a "police action"... Not an invasion.... Tell me more.....

[rob666]

Originally Posted by ILDiva ↗

Duh.... where do you think the Taliban that attacked us were from? I suppose you think our government was responsible for 9/11 too. You seem to think that America is to blame for everything. When did we go to war with Iraq... after 9/11, right? If America wanted a war with Iraq don't you think they would have already been over there prior to 9/11. No, the events of 9/11 are what set it in motion. Go with what your pea brain is telling you,and go on with your closed mind.

The taliban didn't attack you, Al-quada did... The Taliban ran Afghanistan, and gave safe haven to Al-quada..... OMF......... you have no business telling anybody they have a pea brain.....

[tariq hamdan]

that was the petrol taxes...

[turdburgler]

Originally Posted by rob666 ↗

Where in the hell do you come up with this shit....Remember "freedom fries"?...There was NO UN SANCTION.... The WMD's was an American thing.... The UN was not and is not involved militarily.... The UN was against going in... Iraq was not a terrorist haven, Saddam didn't allow it, and there has been absolutly no evidence that al-quada was involved with Saddam...Bush even said so....
You try to make it sound like the UN and the world was behind the "police action" but in reality most of the world refused to become involved...

This is really quite facinating..... Its almost like the twilight zone lol.... So the WMD's was a UN thing that allowed a "police action"... Not an invasion.... Tell me more.....

Maybe sanction was the wrong word.

How about resolution?

Resolution 660, Resolution 661, Resolution 678, Resolution 686, Resolution 687, Resolution 688, Resolution 707, Resolution 715, Resolution 986,Resolution 1284 and Resolution 1441.

All dealing with Iraq and its refusal to comply with disarmerment obligations ; weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), but also the known construction of prohibited types of missiles, the purchase and import of prohibited armamentsits responsiblity to compansate Kuwait for the invasion and ocupation in 1991.


I guess that all didnt happen then.

The UN was against it, sure. It was political posturing buy countries we were having issues with at the time. They were happy siging new warnings "resolutions". As you can tell by the number of them, they were not doing much.

You also ignoring the fact that the U.N. found a tested warheads they determined with capable of being used for WMD's. They were not declaired on the UN weapons declairation presented by Iraq. Inspectors also reported the discovery of over 3,000 pages of weapons program documents in the home of an Iraqi citizen, suggesting an attempt to "hide" them from inspectors and apparently contradicting Iraq's earlier claim that it had no further documents to provide.

[bmvik]

Originally Posted by turdburgler ↗

Maybe sanction was the wrong word.

How about resolution?

Resolution 660, Resolution 661, Resolution 678, Resolution 686, Resolution 687, Resolution 688, Resolution 707, Resolution 715, Resolution 986,Resolution 1284 and Resolution 1441.

All dealing with Iraq and its refusal to comply with disarmerment obligations ; weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), but also the known construction of prohibited types of missiles, the purchase and import of prohibited armamentsits responsiblity to compansate Kuwait for the invasion and ocupation in 1991.


I guess that all didnt happen then.

The UN was against it, sure. It was political posturing buy countries we were having issues with at the time. They were happy siging new warnings "resolutions". As you can tell by the number of them, they were not doing much.

You also ignoring the fact that the U.N. found a tested warheads they determined with capable of being used for WMD's. They were not declaired on the UN weapons declairation presented by Iraq. Inspectors also reported the discovery of over 3,000 pages of weapons program documents in the home of an Iraqi citizen, suggesting an attempt to "hide" them from inspectors and apparently contradicting Iraq's earlier claim that it had no further documents to provide.

those are resolutions, and as you said U.N. was against military action, thanks. Your explanations as to why - are just your own interpretations of why and what blah blah blah.

secondly a "tested" warhead? lol wouldnt it be in pieces?
But you must be talking about this (latest resolution you have mentioned):

"Iraq agreed to the Resolution on 13 November 2002. Weapons inspectors returned on November 27, led by Hans Blix of UNMOVIC and Mohamed ElBaradei of the International Atomic Energy Agency. The inspectors had been absent from Iraq since December 1998 when they were withdrawn immediately prior to Operation Desert Fox

Inspectors began visiting sites where WMD production was suspected, but found no evidence of such activities, except for 18 undeclared 122mm chemical rockets that were destroyed under UNMOVIC supervision. P. 30 As was discovered after the invasion of Iraq, no production of WMDs was taking place, and no stockpiles existed. U.N. inspectors also found that the Al-Samoud-2 and Al-fatah missiles violated U.N. range restrictions, the former also being partially destroyed under UNMOVIC supervision"

OMG !!!111!!one!11!! lets invade the country coz of 18 empty chemical warheads. And dont forget the timeline of those events.
Anyways there was complete fabrication of reasons to invade Iraq by US politicians, after visit to U.N. havent been that fruitful. Go watch more FOX, as you have, fruitloop.