Will Russia Use Nukes?

Roosta · #**101** ● 08-19-2023, 06:45 PM

No they don't, stap talking poop again.
They owned that station since it was built and attacked it 0 times.

Ukraine won't attack that station because they have no need to. Well, paradoxically, if Russians keep deploying their soldiers in the nuclear power plant then yeah, it becomes a military target, and they artificially create a need to attack the station.

If Russians actually wanted to safeguard the station, then they would get the fuck away from that station and allow international observers into the station.

Roosta · #**102** ● 08-19-2023, 07:12 PM

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

The only misinformation, is what they feed you.

Here are the facts:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...ive-melitopol/

“ U.S. intelligence says Ukraine will fail to meet offensive’s key goal”

Even the US is saying the counteroffensive is failing, and will fail. So everything any of you guys believe and said and posted about the counteroffensive until this point in time is complete bullshit according to US intelligence, remember that.

What you guys forgot, is this:

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/04/18/p...ant/index.html

See the video.

Russia has no reason to attack the plant; even the US is saying the counteroffensive will fail.

However, should Russia, despite not needing to attack the plant at all due to the counteroffensive failing, still attack the plant, then supposedly NATO will come and help ukraine. (You will argue that nato promises mean nothing, and I would agree on that one but this is beside the point).

Ukraines only chance of ‘winning’ anything, is getting NATO involved. Ukraines only shot is attacking the plant and blaming it on Russia.

However if Ukraine significantly damages the plant causing nuclear disaster, then IMO Russia will be justified in using nuclear weapons to prevent further escalation

States "Here are the facts" & then directs you to The Washington Post link to read an article yet late last year faust was all, "Ah, you believe in the westerns propaganda narrative like, CNN, Washington Post, NBC, New York Times ect & other various media outlets but you are now wanting to quote from them & calling them Facts.

Make your mind up ol fausty.

Secondly, for you to state "However if Ukraine significantly damages the plant causing nuclear disaster, then IMO Russia will be justified in using nuclear weapons to prevent further escalation.

Fausty has a hankering for the orcs to use nukes as this is another example of his need or want for this to happen, & he has always supported the use of nukes as we have seen with his posts about the topic both now & in the past, which is

at best, as any nation for whatever reason, should refrain from using nukes as there's no winner using them & IMO the cowards way of solving differences without any regard for the world as a whole & to even endorse or support there use is madness, but trust ol fausty to support such action, his limited brain cells & non human nature shine brightly from his constant support of the use of nuclear weapons.

That's some kind of sick, twisted n evil mentality from the air thief faust right there folks.

Roosta · #**103** ● 08-19-2023, 07:24 PM

Originally Posted by WonderMomma ↗

So no credible sources of a discussion between Ukraine and the US disapproving of them using mines to blow up the NPP? That's what I thought.

I'm not interested in your assumptions, fortune telling, conspiracies, conjecture or your opinions.

Again:

False flag is Russia's middle name.

The counteroffensive argument has also been made repeatedly and has nothing to do with the NPP discussion we're having in this nuclear themed thread but nice try.

As usual you're completely twisting the facts surrounding the video to fit your narratives and spread conspiracies. They specifically state "if Russia uses nukes or bombs the ZNPP" NATO would likely get involved. Like most of Russia’s false flag attempts, don’t you think the evidence will most definitely point to the actual culprits, if it happens? This is another reason why Ukraine won't attack their own NPP.

Essentially, all you do is misinform and you hypocritically condemn anyone reading CNN but turn around and use them when they barely support your fantasized arguments. What’s most comical and ironic… you use CNN as a source more than ANYONE ELSE HERE.

Laughable.

Exactly.

I just posted about him stating the very same things about news outlets being quoted by him yet last year it was CNN, NBC, New York Times, Washington Post is all propaganda ect ect ect but now he's quoting them,

, that's messed up big time right there, RONPMSL !

Roosta · #**104** ● 08-19-2023, 07:28 PM

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

1) Ukraine will be saved if NATO gets involved.
2) US adopts a law saying Nato gets involved if Russia attacks the plant
3) the counteroffensive was (and is) failing miserably
4) A single Himars strike against the plant would thus potentially save Ukraine.
5) CNN were amplifying supposed Russian plans to attack the plant which they control, only Ukraine sources no satellite images supporting the claims
6) The US authorises all Himars strikes
7) the attack did not happen

Thus we can surmise the US didn’t allow it

The counteroffensive failed so hard that not even NATO fans would believe that Russia has any need to attack the plant.

Your whole narrative is falling apart basically. US intelligence shits all over your sources. Even CNN is shitting over your Ukrainian narrative and sources. Publishing that the majority of Americans don’t even support funding the war anymore.

Attacking the plant is becoming Ukraine, and your last hope

What day is it in your 3 day SMO !

Roosta · #**105** ● 08-19-2023, 07:30 PM

Originally Posted by WhiskeyOutpost ↗

Just in case you missed it ol fausty.

Faust · #**106** ● 10-04-2023, 07:55 AM

Time to look back at what some of you guys posted. Pay attention to the sources and our (your) western consensus.

Faust · #**107** ● 10-04-2023, 02:39 PM

Anyway, we all know who called it:
https://www.nato.int/docu/review/art...nce/index.html

jg11358 · #**108** ● 10-04-2023, 04:22 PM

Originally Posted by steelgrim ↗

Russia losing ground albeit at a slow pace, but they are. Putins health is failing from the guilt of failing as a leader and sending thousands of soldiers to their deaths for nothing. Medvedev is simply pissed and fed up and really wants to use nukes. I knew russia was going to lose from the start when nato became involved. I am trying to start a poll and I haven't done it before.

Assumptions like this is what separates men from ladies. You're buying the war propaganda? Last I checked, Putin had a 80% approval.