[ljubodrag]

Highlights of Russian Military Operation in Ukraine on January 31. Z.

[WhiskeyOutpost]

The balls it takes to try and claim those are Ukrainians. And no explanation from him as to how one of those hits was clearly a Javelin or another top-down western system. Which Russians don't have.

[ljubodrag]

Originally Posted by WhiskeyOutpost ↗

The balls it takes to try and claim those are Ukrainians. And no explanation from him as to how one of those hits was clearly a Javelin or another top-down western system. Which Russians don't have.

Russians don't have what now? You're joking, right?

[WhiskeyOutpost]

Originally Posted by ljubodrag ↗

Russians don't have what now? You're joking, right?

It's cool just poking fun at how gullible you are when you open up Russian Telegram channels. Fakes are normal stuff for them and Russians in the comment sections are fortunately getting better at detecting bullshit

[Faust]

Originally Posted by WhiskeyOutpost ↗

Those are Russians. You can even see white armbands. And Russians do not use top-down ATGM/rockets

Those are not top-down ATGM rockets, you even see the projectile enter the frame in some of the shots

At 15 seconds in; the projectile covers about 2 person lengths distance in 1 frame. The footage could be slowed down but it is either 30 or 60 fps.

So:

2 persons = 1.8x2=3.6 meters in 1/30th second
Or
3.6 meters in 1/60th second

At 30fps the speed of the projectile was 108m/second so 388.8km/h
At 60 fps the speed would be double so 777,6 km/h

Can you work with either of those numbers to ascertain the type of ammunition @whiskey?

[WhiskeyOutpost]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

Those are not top-down ATGM rockets, you even see the projectile enter the frame in some of the shots

At 15 seconds in; the projectile covers about 2 person lengths distance in 1 frame. The footage could be slowed down but it is either 30 or 60 fps.

So:

2 persons = 1.8x2=3.6 meters in 1/30th second
Or
3.6 meters in 1/60th second

At 30fps the speed of the projectile was 108m/second so 388.8km/h
At 60 fps the speed would be double so 777,6 km/h

Can you work with either of those numbers to ascertain the type of ammunition @whiskey?

Wrong. The first couple shots were standard ATGMs, probably Stugna or Konkurs/Kornet. Later on there were two shots that could very much be Javelin. They were top-down for sure.

[Faust]

The one at 30 seconds is not top down either, in the replay or the closeup you also see the projectile enter, from the right. The slowmotion is processed which is why it would appear that it enters from the left and from an upward angle.

My guess is 9M113 Konkurs; if the footage is at 60fps as the missile speed is 208M/Second which corresponds with my analysis (margin of error being 5%)

[WhiskeyOutpost]

- 3st Schitom artillery on Russians moving a casualty

- 109th OGShB drops an F-1 grenade on Russians

[WhiskeyOutpost]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

The one at 30 seconds is not top down either, in the replay or the closeup you also see the projectile enter, from the right. The slowmotion is processed which is why it would appear that it enters from the left and from an upward angle.

My guess is 9M113 Konkurs; if the footage is at 60fps as the missile speed is 208M/Second which corresponds with my analysis (margin of error being 5%)

Lol at the 5%. Agree to disagree, that rocket came from above.

[Faust]

Originally Posted by WhiskeyOutpost ↗

Wrong. The first couple shots were standard ATGMs, probably Stugna or Konkurs/Kornet. Later on there were two shots that could very much be Javelin. They were top-down for sure.

See inside the red circle