[Trucked up]

No assistance given or even reduction of speed to try to help. Just the description of "A boat of bricks", I'd say just by the sound of that it's a 95% chance you won't get to where you're going.

[Trucked up]

It wasn't easy loading them either.

[Dazzab81]

That shit went down like a stack of bricks

[><0300><]

Those guys were shitting bricks

[Ferocity]

Originally Posted by ><0300>< ↗

Those guys were shitting bricks

If I was the owner of that boat, I'd be shitting bricks too.

[Mr.NoCredit]

Horrifying video. Foggy, unknown distance from shore, the ferry boat sailing along at a good clip. We probably just watched the death of a dozen people there. The sea is very unforgiving.

[gimlet]

Originally Posted by Roosta ↗

Everyone knows to stay away from a sinking ship because of this.

2 Different points of view from a quick google.

1 : Going Down with the Ship:
Ok, this will seem a little off the wall. Many of you who know me know that I used to be a professional sailor years ago. I worked on everything from small oyster boats to tug-n-barge combos running 600 feet in length. Sailors are great exchangers of tales, and no tale is more horrible and morbidly fascinating than that of a ship sinking. Such tales often feature, in one way or another, the idea that people who aren’t able to swim far enough away from the vessel risk being “sucked under” as it goes down.

That idea never struck me as very plausible. A ship going down creates a void in the water where its mass used to be, and water will rush in to fill that void, but the idea that some sort of suction could be created that would literally pull you down with the ship never made sense to me. I don’t have the technical chops to say exactly why, but it just struck me as wrong. While watching video of a sinking fishing vessel yesterday I thought of an alternative explanation that seems much more reasonable.

As most people who mess around with boats know, a prop that breaks the surface can no longer effectively propel the vessel. The reason for this is a phenomenon known as cavitation. When the prop breaks the surface it pulls air down and aerates the water around it. Aerated water does not have the mass of non-aerated water, and the prop can’t push against it effectively. For the same reason you cannot swim in aerated water. If I put you into a tank of water and bubble air up from the bottom you will sink, however mightily you flail.

Which brings me to sinking ships. They have a lot of air inside them, and when they go down that air comes bubbling up from all the various openings through which it can escape. You can see that effect pretty clearly in this two-minute video of a small fishing vessel sinking. A much larger ship means a lot more air, which in the process of escaping turns the water above into a aerated froth. And as I said above, you can’t swim in froth. So, I think the reality is that when a ship sinks and you are in the unfortunate position of treading water right above it, you don’t get sucked down. You fall.

2: When the ship is going down, the empty space inside will fill with water. When that happens a strong current could pull you inside the hull.
The strong movement and the air inside the ship will mix with the seawater immediately above the sinking structure. On top of the boat, when it’s going down, that water will be less dense and less able to keep you afloat. You will fall through.
The air would be a much more deadly opponent than the sinking ship suction. And air can be very dangerous when you deal with water… When they change place, air, and water. The air rushing out of the hull and water rushing in to take its place.

Air mixing with water is another very hazardous matter. The air can create a large area of whitewater with much less density than “solid” bluewater. The ship could create a hole for a few seconds, and if you find yourself in that hole you would have to struggle to stay afloat.

Finally, IMO I do believe that it's true no matter what you call it, vortex, vacuum, white water effect, the end result is death no matter how you slice the cake as the remaining void that the ship leaves, needs to be accounted for & anything within the immediate area would in all likelihood be drawn into that void, or fall into that void, as per the "Whitewater" principal & it would be very hard to sustains one's life under these conditions, so in actual fact, it does have some truth to it.

Fastest ship sinking evah on Documenting Reality! Some or all of those people are dead, why not move this incredible vid to the much more visited death section? Juicy maritime stuff is sparse so I almost never check this section.

Went down like a load of bricks, like a brick ship, like a ton of bricks, a brick shithouse, she's a brick...house

Holy crap, you cant make that ship up, a small boat loaded with bricks so the sides are 9 inches above water. Oh, and transport a dozen probable non-swimmers with no flotation devices on top of the bricks!

Red Roosta, your mariner musings / ship sinking analysis are very informative, right up there with chris' analysis of the drop tower sasquatch disaster or William May's chocolate Easter Bunny analogy of the flaming molten metal coated Chinese foundry worker running around. I remember one or two sailors survived the HMS Hood sinking. IIRC the survivor said he was deep underwater, then burst to the surface. Experts speculated he probably rode a giant bubble from a boiler exploding to the surface, or something like that.