|
#61
●
01-01-2025, 07:40 PM
|
|
Re: South Korea's Jeju Air Plane Crashes at Muan International Airport
Yeah 3 Mi is the cutoff at which point the plane should be fully configured and stabilized and no later. in most circumstances that's just about a thousand feet above the runway which is the criteria for most operators. it certainly is for my company one flying an instrument approach. Typically our gear down call comes at or just before the Final Approach fix which is 5 MI on a standard ILS.
|
|
#63
●
01-02-2025, 12:29 PM
|
|
Re: South Korea's Jeju Air Plane Crashes at Muan International Airport
Over 1000' I think. Quite alot. And there was an EMAS at the end of the runway. Engineered Material Arresting System. A soft surface like a runaway ramp for a truck. But that's designed to work that the wheels are down. Probably didn't help much with the gear down. |
|
#64
●
01-02-2025, 12:37 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS Poster Rank:4083 Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 76 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 16 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: South Korea's Jeju Air Plane Crashes at Muan International Airport
More than 1000m After that the plane would have hit the sea. It's very likely lots people would have survived hadnt the concrete structure been there Surely a lot of airport runways will be reviewed for similar issues after this |
|
#65
●
01-02-2025, 04:06 PM
|
|
Re: South Korea's Jeju Air Plane Crashes at Muan International Airport
A very good analysis from Hoover, a retired military aviator and current airline pilot. Addresses a number of points that have been discussed in this thread. |
|
#66
●
01-02-2025, 07:09 PM
|
|
Re: South Korea's Jeju Air Plane Crashes at Muan International Airport
probably because the seats they are on usually face backwards and are not crammed between loads of people. It's far safer to sit backwards but people are odd sometimes and prefer seats that face in the direction of travel so they can 'see where they're going'
|
|
#69
●
01-11-2025, 09:55 AM
|
|
Re: South Korea's Jeju Air Plane Crashes at Muan International Airport
Apparently the black boxes, the data recorder and the voice recorder both stopped recording 4 minutes before the crash. While they haven't laid out the exact timeline it sounds like they stopped recording shortly after the bird strike and go around. Something went very wrong in that plane during the go-around. The big question I think is going to be was it pilot-induced or some catastrophic failure of electrical systems or both. I wouldn't be totally surprised to find out that this plane was operating with some disabled and deferred equipment as part of a minimum equipment list that left it vulnerable to other failures. |
|
#70
●
01-11-2025, 10:04 AM
|
|
Re: South Korea's Jeju Air Plane Crashes at Muan International Airport
Turns out the localizer antenna and it's foundation mound were less than a thousand feet from the runway just under 900 actually. That's close enough that in the US you could not build an earthen mound like that. And the antenna would have to be built on a breakaway structure whose foundation can be no more than 3" above the ground. The design of this foundation mound absolutely contributed to the death toll. Yes there's a concrete wall around the airport a couple hundred feet after that but if the plane struck that it would have been nose on like crashing your car into a wall this localizer foundation created a ski jump if you will that sent the plane back up into the air breaking its back and causing it to in essence disintegrate. |