|
#135
●
03-05-2015, 12:27 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:12606 Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 1 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Jane Wicker's Bi-Plane Crash Hi-Res Photos
Hi guys, for those who are curious I cropped from 3 photographs to isolate the subject and enhance to have better detail and view, only for discussion mean no disrespect for Jane and her family, please no bashing be advised they are extremely graphics so viewer discretion is always advised, hope they give a better view of the extreme damage and speed of injuries the human body can sustain in a plane crash, I think I read in the report that from stall to fire took only 3 seconds, so at least no suffering... Surprise, Surprise! After observing closely picture number 2 and turning it upside down it seems that the subject is not Jane but seems to be the pilot with one of Jane s arm next to him, I could be wrong but usually I have a pretty good eye tell me what you see, think |
|
#136
●
03-05-2015, 12:35 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:12606 Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 1 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Jane Wicker's Bi-Plane Crash Hi-Res Photos
Hi guys, for those who are curious I cropped from 3 photographs to isolate the subject and enhance to have better detail and view, only for discussion mean no disrespect for Jane and her family, please no bashing be advised they are extremely graphics so viewer discretion is always advised, hope they give a better view of the extreme damage and speed of injuries the human body can sustain in a plane crash, I think I read in the report that from stall to fire took only 3 seconds, so at least no suffering... Surprise, Surprise! After observing closely picture number 2 and turning it upside down it seems that the subject is not Jane but seems to be the pilot with one of Jane s arm next to him, I could be wrong but usually I have a pretty good eye tell me what you see, think |