JavaScript and Cookies are required to view this site. Please enable both in your browser settings.
Air India 787 Jet Ahmedabad to Gatwick Crashes, Major Casualties Expected. - Section 12

Go Back  

Air India 787 Jet Ahmedabad to Gatwick Crashes, Major Casualties Expected. 

Current Rating:

Join NowJoin Now
 
  #111  
Old 06-20-2025, 06:04 PM
kellyhound's Avatar
kellyhound
Online
✝Mudderator from Hell✝
Poster Rank:11
e-mail
Join Date: Oct 2006
Contributions: 817
 
Mentioned: 447 Post(s)
Quoted: 9196 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
19/20 20/20
Today Posts
11/11 ssss89531
Re: Air India 787 Jet Ahmedabad to Gatwick Crashes, Major Casualties Expected.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mocroos View Post
This guy who survived the plane crash will turn out to be the biggest liar ever. He wasn't a passenger on the plane. He was at the hotel where the plane crashed, just walking out.
Vishwashkumar Ramesh, the sole survivor of the Air India Flight 171 crash in Ahmedabad, India, on June 12, 2025, was confirmed to be on the passenger list. He was seated in seat 11A on the London-bound Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, as verified by the flight manifest shared by authorities
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kellyhound For This Useful Post:
gie62023
  #112  
Old 06-21-2025, 12:23 AM
KillingJoke's Avatar
KillingJoke
Offline:
My Rank: SERGEANT
Poster Rank:1215
Join Date: Jul 2012
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
1/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss507
Re: Air India 787 Jet Ahmedabad to Gatwick Crashes, Major Casualties Expected.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonX93 View Post
No flaps = no climb
You can certainly climb without flaps, but you need thrust from the engines. No engines, no climb.

The ram air generator deployed, indicating loss of engines.

Flaps improve lift but also increase drag. Flaps shorten the takeoff roll.

In the event of a dual engine out, reducing flaps reduces drag in order to extend the glide range.... But then why wasn't the gear retracted...

Still many questions without answers yet.
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 06-21-2025, 12:29 AM
KillingJoke's Avatar
KillingJoke
Offline:
My Rank: SERGEANT
Poster Rank:1215
Join Date: Jul 2012
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
1/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss507
Re: Air India 787 Jet Ahmedabad to Gatwick Crashes, Major Casualties Expected.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kellyhound View Post
3. British Couple Who Run Tarot-Reading Spiritual Centre Post Airport Video Before Boarding Doomed Air India Flight
Well, that doesn't say much for their Tarot-reading ability, does it?

"Hey we got the Death card, whadda think, should we chance it?"
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to KillingJoke For This Useful Post:
gie62023, kellyhound, MartyK
  #114  
Old 06-28-2025, 03:39 AM
CombatVet's Avatar
CombatVet
Offline:
My Rank: CORPORAL
Poster Rank:1637
Join Date: Feb 2017
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
1/20 9/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss330
Re: Air India 787 Jet Ahmedabad to Gatwick Crashes, Major Casualties Expected.

In a couple of the clips you can hear when the plane passes that it sounds like a old war airplane with a propeller flying by. That would be the ram air turbine (also called the "RAT"). Deployment of the RAT ONLY happens when an there is a total loss of engines or loss of hydraulics. It deploys automatically to provide just enough juice to power systems deemed "essential". The fact that the sole survivor mentions hearing a loud bang is consistent with the RAT deploying, it makes a distinct loud noise. The RAT will not deploy simply due to a loss of control.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CombatVet For This Useful Post:
sincerelywithlove, terrence
  #115  
Old 07-11-2025, 09:04 PM
HIGHTECHDUDE's Avatar
HIGHTECHDUDE
Online
♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚
Poster Rank:287
ꓕSIꓤIꓕ∀S ϽINOᗡꓤ∀S
Join Date: Feb 2010
Contributions: 6
 
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Quoted: 1234 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
9/20 17/20
Today Posts
1/11 sssss4403
Re: Air India 787 Jet Ahmedabad to Gatwick Crashes, Major Casualties Expected.

A preliminary investigation report has just been released that blames pilot error and reveals one of the pilots turned off the fuel switch(es) mid take-off.

Cockpit recording reveals the pilot questioning the co-pilot about turning off fuel to the engines and the co-pilot denies doing it. Then an attempt is made to turn the fuel on but it's obviously too late to recover.
Test
Picture and Video Clip Stats.
File Type: mp4 Pilot-cut-off-fuel-to-engines-BBC-News.mp4 (28.44 MB , 1 views)
__________________
Custom DR Search Engine
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to HIGHTECHDUDE For This Useful Post:
durt, Hunted, kellyhound, terrence
  #116  
Old 07-11-2025, 10:18 PM
durt's Avatar
durt
Offline:
★ Legacy Member ★
Poster Rank:71
male
Join Date: Apr 2010
Contributions: 1
 
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Quoted: 4902 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
6/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss20607
Re: Air India 787 Jet Ahmedabad to Gatwick Crashes, Major Casualties Expected.

That's fucked up
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to durt For This Useful Post:
kellyhound, terrence
  #117  
Old 07-12-2025, 02:08 AM
Xploit Machine's Avatar
Xploit Machine
Offline:
My Rank: SERGEANT MAJOR
Poster Rank:266
Male
Join Date: Jun 2009
Contributions: 25
 
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quoted: 690 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
4/20 17/20
Today Posts
7/11 sssss4874
Re: Air India 787 Jet Ahmedabad to Gatwick Crashes, Major Casualties Expected.

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Xploit Machine For This Useful Post:
kellyhound
  #118  
Old 07-12-2025, 05:03 AM
kellyhound's Avatar
kellyhound
Online
✝Mudderator from Hell✝
Poster Rank:11
e-mail
Join Date: Oct 2006
Contributions: 817
 
Mentioned: 447 Post(s)
Quoted: 9196 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
19/20 20/20
Today Posts
11/11 ssss89531
Re: Air India 787 Jet Ahmedabad to Gatwick Crashes, Major Casualties Expected.

Investigators say the lever-lock fuel switches are designed to prevent accidental activation - they must be pulled up to unlock before flipping, a safety feature dating back to the 1950s. Built to exacting standards, they're highly reliable. Protective guard brackets further shield them from accidental bumps.

"It would be almost impossible to pull both switches with a single movement of one hand, and this makes accidental deployment unlikely,".

That's why there need to be cockpit video recorders so every movement can be monitored.
Weird they don't know who said what as usally relatives are asked to identify the heared voices.
What if the switches moved on their own? Is that possible?
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kellyhound For This Useful Post:
terrence, Xploit Machine
  #119  
Old 07-12-2025, 08:01 AM
Hogmann's Avatar
Hogmann
Online
♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚
Poster Rank:210
Iceman
Join Date: Aug 2017
 
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Quoted: 3302 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
12/20 9/20
Today Posts
4/11 sssss6911
Re: Air India 787 Jet Ahmedabad to Gatwick Crashes, Major Casualties Expected.

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hogmann For This Useful Post:
kellyhound
  #120  
Old 07-12-2025, 08:04 AM
Hogmann's Avatar
Hogmann
Online
♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚
Poster Rank:210
Iceman
Join Date: Aug 2017
 
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Quoted: 3302 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
12/20 9/20
Today Posts
4/11 sssss6911
Re: Air India 787 Jet Ahmedabad to Gatwick Crashes, Major Casualties Expected.

It's impossible for those switches to move on their own. I don't fly a Boeing but I have switches just like that in the Pilatus they're generally standard across the industry to prevent accidental movement. It's like a light switch but it's got a metal guard in the middle that requires you to pull on the switch and then flip it to the next position. The locking mechanism is so robust that I've seen the switches on the overhead panel of this design get bent by people bumping them with their heads when climbing it out of the seat but the switch did not change position.
The report also states that they were Switched Off one after another with one second between it which does not sound like an accidental bump of the hand but a deliberate action. The big question now will be who turn the switches off and did they do it intentionally meaning did they mean to shut the engines off or were they thinking we were doing something else and flipped these switchs in error
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hogmann For This Useful Post:
kellyhound

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO