[SIMOSIMOSIMO]

Also the Feds sand covered the field in front of the "crash" hours after, this way all remaining evidence are buried!

The simple fact that there are no wing marks on the Pentagon wall, the hole is too small for a 757 to fit through. Further the street light that was apparently knocked down by the Boeing 757 shows glass from the street lamp near by, thus a plane hitting it at 400 MPH whould have thrown the glass a very long distance as it would have shattered on impact. It is likely that the street light was blown just prior to the jet that shot a missile at the Pentagon flew in to make room for it in it's flight path.

[blainegm]

I watched it so many times. I'm no conspiracy "theorist" but that so does not look like a plane.

[irishbum04]

People talking about the size of that thing seem to think that its only 100 yards from the camera... seeing as how the pentagon is 5+ stories tall above ground, this thing you're seeing isn't as small as you think it is...

Doing a rough calculation of the height of the building at the point of impact, versus distance from the camera, you're looking at a 'UFO' that is taller than a single story... last time I checked we didn't have anything short of an ICBM that would come in that large.

Furthermore, withing minutes after the impact, there were photos taken of a fuselage, pieces of the hull, and there have been identified Boeing parts found within the Pentagon from the wreckage.

I dunno, what I see is zero proof of a conspiracy aside from some grainy images and a bounty of paranoia... and the plenty of actual photographs from right after the impact that show plenty of plane parts, etc.

[irishbum04]

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon...dex.html#parts

[irishbum04]

Furthermore, the wingspan of a 757-223 is only 124 feet... so for those people saying the hole is too small, I'd be curious what ruler you are using for measurement... seeing as how the hole measured in at 65 feet wide, with collateral damage to the facade of the building on either side... and plenty of engineers have mentioned that plane wings would snap off when met with this kind of force, folding back along the plane as it entered the building... the force and weight behind the wings is dispersed across a horizontal plane rather than centered at the point of impact... anyone with basic understanding of where things get their strength would be able to figure out how wings snapped off...

And finally, the bevy of unanswered questions:

Why did many eyewitnesses report seeing a large twin-engine jetliner approaching the Pentagon and, in many cases, crashing into the building?
What clipped the lamp posts on the highway overpass in a swath the width of a 757's wingspan?
What gouged the construction yard generator in location in the path of a 757's flap canoe?
What punctured a hole in the Pentagon about 18 feet wide on the second floor and about 90 total feet wide on the first floor?
What was the source of the aircraft debris, some of which appears to match parts from a 757?
What happened to Flight 77 and its passengers?

I think there are a whole lot of people out there who are too willing to blame their own country for the evils that, every day, we see perpetrated by the same folks who take credit for 9/11... an attack that took place as millions of people watched as the exact same kind of attacks took place in NY...

In the end... zero reliable proof of any wrongdoing, plenty of proof that a Boeing crashed into the Pentagon.

[irishbum04]

'What kind of a fire can melt engines made from aluminum and titanum alloy but in the same time preserve human remainings of any kind!?'

Once again, they were not able to identify all the passengers... plenty were identified only by the fact that they were on the manifest and were never seen from again.... you might try and do a little research on how many "bodies" or "body parts" were recovered before you go around making these kinds of baseless, generalized questions.

The fire at the Pentagon burned at about 3000 degrees F where a cremation requires 870–980 °C (1,598–1,796 °F)

Now, in a cremation chamber... you are dealing with very centralized, directed flames concentrated on a specific target, in a closed space... for at least one hour per 99 lbs of human weight.

So, once you start applying science and all, you can easily see how there would be some DNA laying around...

[irishbum04]

This crap pisses me off simply because of the bevy of "experts" that come forward who don't know anything, have done zero research on their own, learned nothing on their own... and are only regurgitating conspiracy theories Jesse Ventura told them about on TV.

[daz1972]

Originally Posted by flying-clipper ↗

What a surprise - you all think 9/11 was a government conspiracy!! I think it's far more unlikely that someone as unintelligent as George W. Bush had anything to do with planning the events that took place on 9/11... or am I just being cynical?

And the US government had nothing to do with the Gulf of Tonkin incident which took the US into Vietnam. False flag ops have been used by governments for years, what makes you think this is not another one, Hitler did it to invade Poland, US did it to invade Vietnam and it looks like they did it again to go into Afghan and Iraq. The biggest propoganda machine is the government controlled media, never believe what they say, make your own judgement.

[daz1972]

Originally Posted by testoboost ↗

LOL....you're all a bunch of backward country nood nicks. A missile would have caused a tremendous amount of damage as it would have been loaded with explosives. Every one of you with "where is the hole from the wings?" What do you think life is, a Bugs Bunny cartoon that when something crashes into a wall it leaves a complete out line of what went through it? Fools. Go learn your selves some physics.

Dude watch the footage of the 2nd plane hitting the twin towers, you can clearly see the wings penetrate through the building... do you not think the same would happen to the pentagon???

[daz1972]

Originally Posted by DJSmurf2010 ↗

The Government has tapes to " Prove " a plane hit the pentagon... Now in my honest opinion, If you were the main person in charge of what happened at the Pentagon, and were constantly getting scrutinized and reported against, wouldnt you simply say fine, look at this footage and tell me its not a plane, rather than simply releasing 5 frames from a CCTV camera that was made in the 60's that shows a white streak which quite frankly, i could make by simply putting some talc powder on my ass and farting...

Maybe the government has tapes that prove a plane did not hit the pentagon, ever thought of it that way?? If they have they should realease it afterall we have footage of both planes hitting the towers so why not the pentagon?? Dont look right to me.