|
#121
●
04-17-2012, 03:07 AM
|
|
Re: 9/11 Explained to Roelly
the thing with controlled demolitions as well...is that most operations require a form of netting to keep tiny frgments from spraying out into the populace...the surviving buildings in the neighborhood would have looked as if shot up with a machine gun...
|
|
#124
●
06-16-2012, 12:18 PM
|
|
Re: 9/11 Explained to Roelly
More arrogance from this wrong turd, what a surprise. So, for you, this is about social status, as you claim the millions of this world, and the majority of the Wests people outside of the USA are all social rejects for questioning the official lie of 911. Funny how you 'researched' building 7 and have the audacity to draw the conclusion you did. To me and all sane and rational people who delved into the subject it shows and Orwellian nightmare of self imposed thought control. Building 7 was so blatantly demolished that it's pretty much a black listed event in mainstream media or research. But you are so insane you actually traipse about claiming you laid out the research proving the utterly vague official lie. Remarkable phycological sickness. So, since you want smug satisfaction of stereotyping millions of people because you debated this with 4 or whatever people who were maybe not articulate and covilized enough to 'impress' you, I figured I would join in and let you know what we think of 'your type'...insane pitiful with a sickness of denial, and self imputed facts, morals, and research. |
|
#127
●
06-17-2012, 02:02 AM
|
|
Re: 9/11 Explained to Roelly
I'll close with this statement. To everyone that thinks their is more to this event than the public record states. Even if your right and I'm wrong. Even if it was a the biggest criminal conspiracy of all time. Nothing is getting accomplished by bickering amongst each other. Even if people got away a mass fraud and murder...we need to let it go and move on. For the simplest way to explain why is this. More is lost by indecision than by wrong decision. Thanks to everyone that involved themselves in this debate. I'm officially done with it here as nothing new has been raised in quite some time. |
|
#128
●
12-18-2012, 06:15 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:7282 Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 27 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 5 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: 9/11 Explained to Roelly
Still waiting on a legitimate answer/explanation as to why/how the BBC can know Building 7 collapsed when it is in the background still standing.
|