HQ Images From The 09/11/2001 Attack on the Pentagon

robot · #**431** ● 05-10-2012, 09:38 PM

Very unstable to all the personnel from all the agencies who were down there. Were you in the city on that day?

Very unstable, according to who??? Besides, Larry Silverstein (leaseholder of WTC) admitted it was "pulled" that day.

robot · #**432** ● 05-10-2012, 09:41 PM

What are you Dylan Avery's brother? Quack.

I don't know. The controlled-demolition of the WTC 1,2, and 7, the missile at the Pentagon, the invisible plane in Shanksville, the oil wars, the policing of the world, and the complete destroying of our constitution (NDAA, CISPA, Patriot Act, etc) has me preoccupied. I'll just take your word on the Winter Garden, it yours!

Billthegravedigger · #**433** ● 05-10-2012, 09:52 PM

I have tried Robot, I have tried about everything, but some will not accept it. What so many do not realize about the towers is that they could not remain standing the way they were damaged.

The trusses held the towers together, and and when enough failed, they were coming down, period.

Just from the dipicted damage profiles, it is easy to see there were plenty of floor trusses damaged, then the raging infernos only did more to confound the problem. I did a screen cap that shows how the weight had to redistribute it'sself around the gash that Flight 11 left.

Billthegravedigger · #**434** ● 05-10-2012, 09:53 PM

Originally Posted by robot ↗

What are you Dylan Avery's brother? Quack.

To be 100 % honest, I considered asking him that very same question !!!

robot · #**435** ● 05-10-2012, 09:57 PM

Have you ever been on Vessey street or seen WTC 1, 6 and 7. It's a NARROW street and WTC 6 was only 8 stories tall - 1 collapsed almost on to the front of and parts of that "steel" structure fell on to the roof of WTC 7. .

Originally Posted by vonjo27 ↗

Dude, we're going around in circles. You're pictures only prove what I know to be true. Forget the arrows, forget the fire, forget the collapsing- THERE IS NO FUCKING PLANE IN ANY OF THE PICTURES. What you see is a damaged building that has been hit by a missile. You can twist it any way you want, but that doesn't produce a plane. Explain the defense system, the still-shit cameras, the confiscated videos, the new reporters, the workers, the eye-witnesses, pilots, the firefighters, the employees, the experts, the US Major General- ALL SAID THERE WASN'T ANY FUCKING PLANE.
And like the pentagon pictures, the ones of Building 7 prove what I believe to be true as well. As you're map points out, building 7 is across the street, the FURTHEST building from 1 and 2. There were closer building that sustained far worse damage that didn't collapse. And Silverstein wasn't talking about firefighters- the firefighters had already been pulled after the towers collapsed- that's a fact. There are too many "coincidences" in your stories, my friend. That statistical probability of all those coincidences surrounding 9/11 being true are in the billions.
You don't even have to look at the evidence of 9/11- look at what has happened since. It all points to a false-flag operation. You're sad, and pathetic. I was like you too, but thank God I'm no longer a mindless zombie. Good luck- this conversation is over, finally!

vonjo27 · #**436** ● 05-10-2012, 09:57 PM

Originally Posted by robot ↗

What are you Dylan Avery's brother? Quack.

Hahaha- I'm not the one bending over backwards trying to make sense out of the government's story. I don't have to convince anybody, I'm comfortable knowing 2+2 =4.

Billthegravedigger · #**437** ● 05-10-2012, 09:59 PM

Originally Posted by vonjo27 ↗

Hahaha- I'm not the one bending over backwards trying to make sense out of the government's story. I don't have to convince anybody, I'm comfortable knowing 2+2 =4.

Yeah, sure, we hear you there cupcake.

robot · #**438** ● 05-10-2012, 10:09 PM

And for the last time - a Boeing 757 hit the pentagon, the damage it did on the trajectory it was going are consistent with the velocity, fuel load and size of the plane.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

Billthegravedigger · #**439** ● 05-10-2012, 10:10 PM

I know, I know- we're all conspiracy nuts. Sheep like you are quick to attack character, but are too clueless to dispute evidence.

Something about that above phrase...........it just kind of sticks out to me for some reason. Which part, and why ? Oh yeah, it is this part right here.

are too clueless to dispute evidence.

Why does that stand out to me ? Maybe because of something like this maybe ?

You're sad, and pathetic. I was like you too, but thank God I'm no longer a mindless zombie. Good luck- this conversation is over, finally!

And maybe this too.

Hahaha- I'm not the one bending over backwards trying to make sense out of the government's story. I don't have to convince anybody, I'm comfortable knowing 2+2 =4.

Too clueless to dispute evidence huh ? Damn, shame on us, huh ?

robot · #**440** ● 05-10-2012, 10:20 PM

"The Gate Camera - Some people don't seem to see perspective correctly. I've zoomed in, and compared the two frames over and over - here is what I see as the airplane. I will repeat, however, that this is terrible evidence due to the horrible quality of the original images. I do believe, however, that the white smoke in the images is caused by one or more damaged engine from the impact with the multiple light poles on the way in (as seen in the above image). I stuck in a 757 that was at relatively the same angle - except it's banking slightly to starboard instead of to port - hence the ONE wing is out of place. If it was banking slightly to port it would fit perfectly... However, once again - this is entirely subjective and the image quality from the released surveillance camera is not good enough to form a factual opinion.
http://files.abovetopsecret.com/imag...7/camera1b.gif

HQ Images From The 09/11/2001 Attack on the Pentagon

Documenting Reality