Brown’s Gas Metal Matrix Prozess

[schleifspur]

It is proven formally, the Brown's Gas can neutralize radioactive waste in seconds, simple and extremely inexpensive. This neutralization can be directly in the nuclear power plant, to be carried out on reactor. This would all transports, or eliminating disposal or storage sites.

Since the first successful demonstration in 1991, more than 50 other demonstrations in China, Japan, USA and the UK were carried out. We tested the method with radioactive samples from many elements such as americium, cobalt, uranium and plutonium. The process is very safe and extremely easy and cheap.

http://www.eagle-research.com/browng...sbg/whatis.php

The current theory of Brown's Gas states that Brown's Gas is a mixture of di-atomic and mon-atomic hydrogen and oxygen. Brown's Gas, Book One explains it in detail, but here is a peek.

The simplest way to make Brown's Gas is to use an electrolyzer, which uses electricity to split water into its elements of hydrogen and oxygen. At the instant that the water splits, the hydrogen and oxygen are in their mon-atomic state, this is H for hydrogen and O for oxygen.

Normal electrolyzers encourage the hydrogen and oxygen to drop to their di-atomic state. Di-atomic means the hydrogen formed H2 and the oxygen formed O2. The di-atomic state is a lower energy state, the energy difference shows up as heat in the electrolyzer. This energy is now unavailable to the flame.

WHAT IF a significant number of these H and O atoms did not reform into di-atomic molecules? We start by adding 442.4 Kcal per mole to split water using electrolysis. This is an endothermic (energy absorbing) action. But if we have no, or little, 're-bonding' into di-atomic molecules, then our electrolyzer wouldn't heat up, because there would be no exothermic reaction that would cause excess heat, beyond the agitation of the fluid by the bubbles. This 'lack of heat' in the electrolyzer is what I noted in my experiments that actually produced Brown's Gas.

There would also be a significantly larger volume of gas produced by the electrolyzer, well beyond any reasonable expectation of a 'normal' electrolyzer. The mon-atomic moles would take up twice the volume that the di-atomic moles for the same weight of water electrolyzed.

Eagle-Research experiments verify this: — not to that efficiency, but much more volume than you could expect by assuming a maximum efficiency to a normal electrolyzer. The math and experiments are well documented in Brown's Gas, Book One. For a quick example, let's use the results of an independent test of Brown's Gas by an engineer named Harald Hanisch.

Mr. Hanisch was Director of Research and Development of Simmering-Graz-Pauker, a large machine-building and railway-car manufacturer owned by the Austrian government. He couldn't believe that oxygen and hydrogen could be mixed and burned safely and he certainly would not believe that Yull Brown got any 340 liters of gas per kilowatthour. Mr. Hanisch decided to go to Australia to see for himself. He wanted to test for himself the actual input of electricity and the actual output of gas. During his actual testing, with the water displacement method, he found Yull Brown's machine produced 368 liters per kilowatthour.


Brown Gas – HHO (004)

WaterGas Green Machines – How It Works

Water (H20) is composed of two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen (HHO). The WaterGas Green Machines use electricity to separate the hydrogen and oxygen found in water. The separated hydrogen and oxygen are mixed with gasoline and outside air. The “mixed” gas is then drawn into the engine using vacuum pressure, where it is mixed with gasoline and ignited by the spark plugs.

The WaterGas Green Machines use low temperature, low pressure and small amounts of electricity to produce a special mixed, common ducted gas, called Rhodes~Browns Gas, in deference to the individuals who first patented the process. This gas differs substantially from ordinary hydrogen gas. This has been documented in a recent US Patent Application # 20060075683 (13 April 2006) by D. J. Klein & R. M. Santilli. This process will make about 1,866 quarts of hydrogen/oxygen gas from 1 quart of water. Mixing this gas is a very simple, effective and safe process. Without the need for pressurized tanks, it makes previous concerns about hydrogen safety all but irrelevant.

Our kits use a vacuum driven bubbler – first used on fighter planes in WWII – to draw Brown’s Gas and water vapor into the engine manifold where it combines with the hydrocarbon (gasoline) fuel. The amount of Brown’s Gas and vapor being drawn into the engine manifold is very small – less than 0.25% – but its effect on the power output of the gasoline is dramatic.

After years of research and development, many people in Laboratories are confident that the introduction of systems of this type, will advance the cause of energy independence. The Langs’ WaterGas Green Machines makes “hydrogen on demand” and “hydrogen on board” systems practical right now and the end result is a cleaner and more efficient automobile with an average savings of 25-50% at the pump!

[alpha.first.one]

hoax

[Swd_cooper]

how is it a hoax? any physical proof?

[winvens]

Unproven/scam. This should be moved to the conspiracy section.

[4allmyrage]

I work on cars every day and have seen them mounted and functioning. Talked to some people and found out that they were also being used in some police vehicles.....????
All these people that can not comprehend how the physics of the world they live in really work.

[Skittles]

Originally Posted by Swd_cooper

how is it a hoax? any physical proof?

here's your proof:
www.water4gas.com

you can look it up yourself