|
#42
●
02-21-2013, 02:29 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: STAFF SERGEANT Poster Rank:814 I Am Dic-N-Bawss Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 957 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 171 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: New York City Crime Scene Photos 1915-1920
 Dude seriously, what the hell is going on in this photo? This unproportioned bastard's head looks way to small for his body, and those legs are f@cking enormous. WTF  WTF ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?   · |
|
#43
●
02-24-2013, 04:29 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:3252 Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 114 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 12 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: New York City Crime Scene Photos 1915-1920
look, most of these images were taken with a wide-angle lens to capture most of the scene in in the usually narrow buildings. These lenses tend to distort the image quite strong, thats why his proportions seem to be kinda wrong. |
|
#49
●
06-28-2013, 05:30 PM
| ||||||||
 ★ Legacy Member ★ Poster Rank:736 Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 1,103
Contributions: 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Quoted: 177 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: New York City Crime Scene Photos 1915-1920
^  They aren't by Sante. From his book, but he didn't take them. He wasn't born until 1954. Most, if not all were taken by Arthur "Weegee" Fellig. He was a photographer in NYC during the early 1900's. He got his nickname from the NYPD because he was usually at the crime scene before they were.
|
