|
#1
●
08-21-2013, 12:00 PM
|
|
WikiLeaks Soldier Manning Sentenced to 35 Years in Prison
(Reuters) - Bradley Manning, the U.S. soldier convicted of the biggest breach of classified data in the nation's history by providing files to WikiLeaks, was sentenced to 35 years in prison on Wednesday. |
|
#2
●
08-21-2013, 02:10 PM
|
|
Re: WikiLeaks Soldier Manning Sentenced to 35 Years in Prison
Surrounded by two big black guys. Visions of the next 35 years. · |
|
#4
●
08-22-2013, 10:34 AM
|
|
Re: WikiLeaks Soldier Manning Sentenced to 35 Years in Prison
Now known as Chelsea Manning, she has decided to transition to female. She apparently told army psychiatrists that she wanted to be female years ago, and sent them pictures dressed as such. They have apparently leaked to the media, but I could only find the one such photo. US Military prisons however do not provide hormone treatment, and she will be sent to a male prison, or kept in solitary confinement. |
|
#7
●
08-22-2013, 12:42 PM
|
|
Re: WikiLeaks Soldier Manning Sentenced to 35 Years in Prison
They should be pinning a medal on his chest. The real 'Traitors' are the ones behind the War in the Middle East. |
|
#9
●
08-23-2013, 07:14 AM
|
|
Re: WikiLeaks Soldier Manning Sentenced to 35 Years in Prison
I like how the Army is trying to misdirect the issue by releasing the pictures of him/her as a female and trying to brand him/her a weirdo. They are trying so hard to make a villain. They have successfully created a martyr though. Next time someone wants to tell the public that the army murdered reporters and covered it up, they will have to remember the guy/girl whose life was instantly and fundamentally ruined through ridicule and incarceration. I totally support Chelsea Manning. Attagirl. |
|
#10
●
08-23-2013, 07:34 AM
| ||||||||
| So Fucking Banned Poster Rank:333 Male Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 3,852 Mentioned: 13 Post(s) Quoted: 750 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: WikiLeaks Soldier Manning Sentenced to 35 Years in Prison
There is potentially another stink about wikileaks and documents that may be "injurous" to the public. Some guy was stopped at heathrow airport in England by anti-terrorist police and held on terrorism charges They got wind of him carrying sensitive documents from Germany to Brazil, I wonder who pulled the trigger on this? The guy they arrested say the documents must not be seen by the US authorities. And to add onto that little cake, it is illegal to even search the evidence they have obtained but they can circumvent such issues "because they can". Anyone else enjoying the total authority now employed? |