[niknik]

Originally Posted by niknik ↗

I do find it odd that the people that get the biggest response and protests. Are almost always dead from a justifiable shooting, or an overdose.

Makes me think the puppetmasters are just trying to divide us. By making everything a crises. And pick things that aren't controversial and make them controversial, because that's the best way to make people stop listening to eachother.

Because people are like "why am I arguing about this, it's so clearly this way, everyone who disagrees is a radical".

[Bohemond]

All these riots were sparked by the death of George Floyd which the media unanimously declared "innocent black man murdered by racist white police". George Floyd died from a drug overdose. The media wont report the truth..they're corrupt.

[niknik]

If Kyle Rittenhouse said "shoot me *****".

The media and the entirety of the left would call him a racist. And celebrate him being shot by anyone.

But for some crazy, just totally fucked logic of the left. If you stand on their side of a cause or protest, you can say the n word, you can beat your wife, you can diddle kids, you can be a grand Master of the klan. And they won't say shit negative towards you.

Someone much smarter than me once said. People on the left don't look into anything they stand for, and whenever one does, they become a Republican.

[ThoughtOasis]

Reiterating niknik's idea above, the left should be embracing Kyle.

After all, Kyle shot an 'evil racist white man' (Rosenbaum) who used the N word repeatedly. Not to mention Rosenbaum was a convicted child molester. Isn't the left supposedly the bastion of PROTECTING THE CHILDREN!? Well, unless it's abortion, then fuck those kids...gotta make those billions of $$'s via Planned Parenthood somehow, right?
All those poor blacks around Rosenbaum, having to endure Rosenbaum's verbal torment from the use of N word, over and over. Haven't they endured enough!? Perhaps they should sue the Rosenbaum family (and the other morons "peacefully protesting")? After all, isn't a popular slogan "Confront racism wherever and whenever"?

Funny how things matter in one instance, but not in another...

[dankboosh]

Originally Posted by ThoughtOasis ↗

Reiterating niknik's idea above, the left should be embracing Kyle.

After all, Kyle shot an 'evil racist white man' (Rosenbaum) who used the N word repeatedly. Not to mention Rosenbaum was a convicted child molester. Isn't the left supposedly the bastion of PROTECTING THE CHILDREN!? Well, unless it's abortion, then fuck those kids...gotta make those billions of $$'s via Planned Parenthood somehow, right?
All those poor blacks around Rosenbaum, having to endure Rosenbaum's verbal torment from the use of N word, over and over. Haven't they endured enough!? Perhaps they should sue the Rosenbaum family (and the other morons "peacefully protesting")? After all, isn't a popular slogan "Confront racism wherever and whenever"?

Funny how things matter in one instance, but not in another...

What a stupid thing to say. Why do people like you use previous behavior to justify killing someone? That's the entire point, nothing the guy did is punishable by death... especially not by some 17 year old fucktard loser with a big gun and a tiny dick

[niknik]

Originally Posted by dankboosh ↗

What a stupid thing to say. Why do people like you use previous behavior to justify killing someone? That's the entire point, nothing the guy did is punishable by death... especially not by some 17 year old fucktard loser with a big gun and a tiny dick

Our entire justice system is based on previous behavior. When police are considering a suspect, they look at past behavior to decide if it's in this person's character.

A DA will look at past behavior to decide severity of charges. Judges look at it to determine punishments.

Everyone uses it. Jobs, schools.

Does it justify killing, no. But it shows this guy has a history of violence. And what is the defense? That the victim was threatening violence towards the suspect.

Look at his past. Oh look, he has shown himself to be violent. Not too mention the video which shows him chasing someone, and is no doubt attempting to use violence on someone.

So in a way, his past supports the claims of self defense and his death being justified.

[niknik]

Originally Posted by dankboosh ↗

What a stupid thing to say. Why do people like you use previous behavior to justify killing someone? That's the entire point, nothing the guy did is punishable by death... especially not by some 17 year old fucktard loser with a big gun and a tiny dick

And according to your post. Threatening a person. And chasing them, cornering them. And attempting to take a firearm off that person.

Isn't a dangerous thing to do. That a reasonable person shouldn't expect to get shot doing so. And a person being attacked, should just hand their attacker their weapon.

What a incredibly stupid thing to say.

And I guarantee this kid doesn't get convicted. He was only charged to appease the mob.

[dankboosh]

Originally Posted by niknik ↗

And according to your post. Threatening a person. And chasing them, cornering them. And attempting to take a firearm off that person.

Isn't a dangerous thing to do. That a reasonable person shouldn't expect to get shot doing so. And a person being attacked, should just hand their attacker their weapon.

What a incredibly stupid thing to say.

And I guarantee this kid doesn't get convicted. He was only charged to appease the mob.

This fucking idiot again. They attacked him AFTER he had already shot someone. Why do you think they were going after him in the first place? The last two people he shot were trying to get his weapon away so he didn't MURDER anyone else. Sorry fucko, that's not self defense.

[dankboosh]

Originally Posted by niknik ↗

Does it justify killing, no.

End of fucking story.

[niknik]

Originally Posted by dankboosh ↗

End of fucking story.

Not really, since the guy wasn't killed for his past. His past only makes people feel even less for his death.