|
#102
●
08-17-2014, 11:57 PM
|
|
Re: St. Louis Riots After Cop Kills Unarmed Teen
You can use your phone to get the police radio app. St. Louis is on it, I've tuned in a few times since it started. Kinda crazy how much crime is going on. The media isn't reporting a fraction of what's going on as far as burglaries, robberies, vandalism and arson.
|
|
#104
●
08-18-2014, 12:16 AM
|
|
Re: St. Louis Riots After Cop Kills Unarmed Teen
Ah, here's our nik again...I know where I am, I'm simply responding to your childish rhetoric...oh and thanks for your disturbing preoccupation with my genitalia and gender but you should really focus on your own, no one else will... I'm simply repeating what the Ferguson Chief of Police said, which was that the cop DID NOT know that Brown had stolen the cigars...we'll see if that story changes skippy. And if he's a thug it's interesting that he has no record not that in and of itself would justify his shooting... Sorry to burst your little bubble nik, I didn't say I believed or didn't believe anyone, not all the facts are in...but so far one allegation appears to lack any contradiction and that is that Brown had his hands up at one point and was shot down by this cop... Once again, I'm not defending this guy or the riots, but I'm not defending the either cop because if the initial report is true, that Brown was 'hands up' surrendering, shooting him to death ain't gonna fly and this cop's career is hanging by a thread. Of course, you're willing to ignore all that because...he's a thug (with no record), a thief cigars so he could smoke blunts), and he pushed a cashier...it's all good one less black guy, world's a better place, right? Thanks nik, at least you're consistent. |
|
#105
●
08-18-2014, 12:21 AM
|
|
Re: St. Louis Riots After Cop Kills Unarmed Teen
Uh, actually, If the guy's running away, even after an alleged assault, stops and puts his hands up (even once he's been shot) and said cop administers a coup de grâce on him, I'd like to see the chapter and verse of the law that allows that... Or is that just another one of those laws that exists your mind? |
|
#106
●
08-18-2014, 12:30 AM
|
|
Re: St. Louis Riots After Cop Kills Unarmed Teen
LES and JULIE BOSMAN AUGUST 17, 2014 FERGUSON, Mo. — Michael Brown, the unarmed black teenager who was killed by a police officer, sparking protests around the nation, was shot at least six times, including twice in the head, a preliminary private autopsy performed on Sunday found. One of the bullets entered the top of Mr. Brown’s skull, suggesting his head was bent forward when it struck him and caused a fatal injury, according to Dr. Michael M. Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the City of New York, who flew to Missouri on Sunday at the family’s request to conduct the separate autopsy. It was likely the last of bullets to hit him, he said. Mr. Brown, 18, was also shot four times in the right arm, he said, adding that all the bullets were fired into his front. The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body. However, that determination could change if it turns out that there is gunshot residue on Mr. Brown’s clothing, to which Dr. Baden did not have access. Long article....here is the rest http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/08/18...=homepage&_r=0 |
|
#107
●
08-18-2014, 02:10 AM
|
|
Re: St. Louis Riots After Cop Kills Unarmed Teen
They've done that in [I'm not going to Google it.] and the instances of compaints against officers went down by over 60% I'm paraphrashing what i heard on a podcast a couple weeks ago. It's like a small GoPro they wear on their person, as opposed to just the dashcam. I think it's a good idea. To protect the public AND cover the Cops asses too. |
|
#110
●
08-18-2014, 09:50 AM
|
|
Re: St. Louis Riots After Cop Kills Unarmed Teen
They wear lapel cams here in Albuquerque..…liberals still complain and in fact are now arguing that it infringes peoples privacy rights. Cant fix fucking retarded |