[TheVrist]

Originally Posted by Meridian ↗

Marvellous comeback

Of curse it is. It's affirmative that your opinion doesn't mean shit. You don't live in America to even begin to understand the statistics of what's going on.

The cultural imbalances, rise in mental health issues, and the decline of social political things. Basically, the same libtarded mentality that breeds like a virus in your shit-town of 60 millions, has latched on to a nation of 350 million people, and still, in spite having a gun culture, guns are the least damaging to our society.

[TheVrist]

Originally Posted by TypeOnegative ↗

Lisa Marie Nowak drove cross country in a diaper to attack her imagined Internet lover’s Girlfriend and her grand planned was foiled when her victim rolled up the window of her car.

Nowak, if you don’t know, is smarter and mentally healthier than you’ll ever be. You can look up her insane academic knowledge, as a literal fucking rocket scientist, and the first female astronaut to have been in charge of her own missions, etc... She is and was and will always be one of the most resilient and mentally impressive people to have ever walked the earth, yet she’ll be forever remember as the astronaut who was arrested after driving cross country in a diaper with a maniacal kidnapping plot that failed immediately.

Regardless of what you think you know about mental health, Nowak is proof that you’re wrong. Anyone is capable of going off the deep end. It doesn’t take mental illness. It takes an accumulated amount of stress that you can no longer handle. And every man, woman, and child on this planet has a limit. Most of us have no idea how close we really are to a mental breakdown.

Pulling one case out of your ass doesn't make it the standard. That's an ad hoc fallacy, which would suggest you know jack shit about mental health, yourself.

Mental illness is the scapegoat of the Republican Party. The party in the US that is not only the least educated, but also the proudest of having the least education. Republicans value faith over knowledge and credit religion for resilience. They say things like, “If you don’t believe in God then what is keeping you from raping whoever you want.”

Mental health is actually a liberal scapegoat used to make excuses for shit poor child rearing and social development experiments gone wrong. Need help figuring that out? See the autism epidemic, over diagnosing shitty raised kids. Last I checked, mental health was still a department of science, why recognized as science is beyond me, but the gist has always been that "Christians" rejected science.

Are republicans really least educated? Or has "education" come full swing LOW IQ friendly, and now has more programs for academics that are not only useless to society, but damaging? Affirmative action, and lottery tuition play a big role in buffering "educated" numbers for liberals, not to mention that liberal progressivism always attracts youthful audiences, that sometimes end up being staunch conservatives once they mature. That was the common case for college hippies from the 60s.

What's "educated" mean? Can a low IQed person get a degree in anything productive? Does this mean everyone that doesn't have a qualified "degree" is low IQed? Not hardly- It takes a lot of intelligence to grasp the high-ends of TRADE SKILLS which do not get the accredited "degree" status quo, and is predominately held within right wing level people. Ever took advanced welding courses? HVAC classes? Culinary Classes? Do you really think a mouth breathing GENDER STUDIES professor would understand the basics of blue-print reading? Having a "degree" isn't a true measure of intelligence. It may have 60+ years ago, but that isn't the case, anymore.

Many people with a "degree" now, are welfare recipients that were paid to go to school, and generally pick the most trivial courses that even a goat would do well at. Majority of them couldn't change a tire, or even handle basic problem solving skills. Low intelligence could attribute to this.

Unless, of course, you mean to say they are the "most indoctrinated" I would agree. Our schools systems are not turning out high-end productivity candidates, they are turning out professional activist in alarming numbers.

.

The atheist responds, “I do rape whoever I want. I just happen to want to rape zero people.”

As an atheist, myself, I would never say such a thing. We're not a monolith, anyway, so that generalization is grossly misused. Don't speak for me.

The theist is truly an epiphany away from rape and murder. All it takes is the thought they are alone and that they can end their own suffering with a bullet and then they’re out the door with their large collection of guns.

What?

Care to argue? Almost every single American mass shooter has been a middle class white male conservative with a religious background. In fact, there isn’t a case of a single atheist mass shooter. Nor is there a single case in which mental illness was the actual suspected cause of any mass shooting in America’s long history of mass shootings. The earliest school massacre, btw, dates back to the 1800s. An earlier slice of uneducated Americans gun-worshipping propaganda posted on this thread suggested that shootings are a modern phenomenon. This, of course, is not true. The earliest shootings coincide with the earliest guns. There is a time in American history where guns were not regulated at all and every Tom, Dick and Harry in the schoolyard had them and they were often used to settle disputes.

59 of the "mass" shootings which is poorly defined, because mass shootings happen on a regular basis in the hood, Chicago for instance, but since it is looped media likes to twist narratives, they like to muddy the narratives with equating mass shooting with mass murders- thus, making the more obvious dangerous outcomes of mass shootings be more along the lines of death vs gun.

But to entertain your misinformed position. Are white men (i'll get to your other assertive poop later) more inclined to be mass shooters?

Well, not entirely true. Most "mass shootings" happen every weekend in places like Chicago's predominately black neighborhoods. But, since they're non essential to provoke a narrative, and in more cases than none, injuries happen but not many fatalities. Again, that's how they control the narratives of playing with mass murders vs mass shooting, both of which has their own category on the FBI statistics.

Now, does this negate that more white males have conducted mass murders with a gun? of course not! White people are over 60% of the population. Common sense would suggest that 60% of the population would indeed have a higher rate of (insert topic here)- But does that mean that white people are more likely to conduct mass murder by gun? No-

59 Mass murders by white males that are in a population of 65% of the country.

17 mass murders by black males that represent 14% of the population.

7 mass murders by Latinos (ones not booked as white) that represent the population of 17%

8 mass murders by gun by Asians that represent 6.5% of the population-

3 Mass murders by Native Americans that represent 0.9% of the population.

Religion- While your hyperbolic or wishful thinking could just easily be dismissed using the examples above, we should note that the vast majority of mass murderers by a gun were unidentifiable as far as having religious backgrounds. Considering the larger amount because of population being "white" it's only safe to assume that they come from chritian backgrounds. There are no difinitive studies to prove each and every one of them having any religious reasoning behind their positions. I, myself, have been an open athiest since I was young enough to remember, however, if I was to shoot up a place, my religious background would thus extend into my family, which are a mix of Christians, and jews. So, I am sure it would be assumed that I was one as well, unless of course, I blew shit up in the name of logical science.

But to entertain your bullshit-
Roughly 70-80% of Americans identify as Christian-
only 4.5% of them can be accounted for as being religious motivated and carrying out mass murders by gun.
Muslims make up 0.9% of the population and carry out 8.5% of the over all mass murders in the name of religion.

vast majority of mass murders are carried out by people that do so with non-religious motives.

Since 1999's columbine shooting, there has been no definitive proof of what political leanings dominate the mind-sets of these murderes. Most outlets attempt to garner information from their social media, and political registrations, but those two sources provided little to ziltch solid evidence, since none expressed any political leanings in their motives. Many news sources from both sides of the political pendulum scrambles to try and allocate a political leaning, but they both always come up short. Just a handful of examples in this article.

https://www.politifact.com/new-york/...rats-rep-tenn/


What’s different between a shooting today and a shooting in 1902? Only the number of rounds that can be fired in quick succession. Thus, with little to no research one can easily ascertain that the only common factor of all shootings in America and worldwide is the presence of the firearm used to shoot.

The only thing that has changed is frequency of it happening. In 1902 is was almost unheard of, and when it did, it was the talk of the town fro decades. The differences are social decline. The worse society gets, guns don't need to be relevant to promote violence. Brazil, for instance, has a 30.5 per capita murder rate, and stiff gun laws. America has a 4.5 per capita rate, with a moderately lax gun law.



You may wish to argue some of these points. Don’t. You are no Lisa Marie Nowak. You aren’t enlightened, educated, or (based on your presence here) even likely to have something that qualifies for good mental health. You’re a breakup, car accident, late fee, lost job, or unpaid debt notice away from snapping and killing someone yourself. Don’t act like you aren’t. You don’t know two fucking things about mental health. Every now and then... we all get sad.

The best way to protect yourself from a moment of sadness at the wrong fucking time is to not have a gun nearby when it inevitably comes. But, if you’re determined not to listen to a stranger on the internet, and why would you, at least do me one favor and record the moment when it comes. I look forward to having this debate with people when they call you mentally ill.

And in closing to your pathetically poorly compiled and bias rant, people in a "breakdown" are more known to drink themselves stupid, then get in a car, and kill people, trying to self destruct. More often than not, the booze gets the blame, and not the emotional wreck driving the car in the first place.

[TypeOnegative]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

And in closing to your pathetically poorly compiled and bias rant, people in a "breakdown" are more known to drink themselves stupid, then get in a car, and kill people, trying to self destruct. More often than not, the booze gets the blame, and not the emotional wreck driving the car in the first place.

I searched hard for something in your post I disagree with, but no matter how much effort I put into discovering a flaw I simply could not do it. Every statement is sound and thought provoking. I especially like how you used uncited statistics that were unrelated to anything I’d said to dismantle my points with such authority.

Calling me out on my bullshit, calling my argument biased, and reinterating the term clever portmanteau “libtard” also served to emphasize your intellectual superiority over me and your mastery on the subject. I became unnerved when you wrote that I knew nothing about mental health because I chose to use a well-known individual who is easily researched in an explanation of a mental breakdown of a mentally healthy person.

As a result of your thoughtfully crafted diatribe I now know that anecdotes mean nothing, whether referring to a mentally healthy person’s breakdown in regard to the myth that mentally ill people are the only ones capable of shooting someone, and also in regard to your slugging off the arguments from people in other nations that don’t have mass shootings because they aren’t American and can’t possibly understand how easy it is to get your dick stuck in a flash suppressor while bending over your 9mm to hit another couple keys in your reasoned and knowledgeable insights.

Thank you for disregarding my suggestion to keep your mouth shut. How could I have ever been validated if you actually for a moment believed you were incapable of having an incorrect opinion?

[TheVrist]

Originally Posted by TypeOnegative ↗

I searched hard for something in your post I disagree with, but no matter how much effort I put into discovering a flaw I simply could not do it. Every statement is sound and thought provoking. I especially like how you used uncited statistics that were unrelated to anything I’d said to dismantle my points with such authority.

Calling me out on my bullshit, calling my argument biased, and reinterating the term clever portmanteau “libtard” also served to emphasize your intellectual superiority over me and your mastery on the subject. I became unnerved when you wrote that I knew nothing about mental health because I chose to use a well-known individual who is easily researched in an explanation of a mental breakdown of a mentally healthy person.

As a result of your thoughtfully crafted diatribe I now know that anecdotes mean nothing, whether referring to a mentally healthy person’s breakdown in regard to the myth that mentally ill people are the only ones capable of shooting someone, and also in regard to your slugging off the arguments from people in other nations that don’t have mass shootings because they aren’t American and can’t possibly understand how easy it is to get your dick stuck in a flash suppressor while bending over your 9mm to hit another couple keys in your reasoned and knowledgeable insights.

Thank you for disregarding my suggestion to keep your mouth shut. How could I have ever been validated if you actually for a moment believed you were incapable of having an incorrect opinion?

Oh, you don't like someone belittling your post full of generic generalizations, abstracts, and false equivalents, which was just you belittling a particular portion of the entire population that you have some skewed predisposition about which is obvious since you have these imaginary ideas.

The term "libtard" is befitting to those that have a retarded world view, with an "us vs them" mentality, which in turn makes them no better than the very people they try and shuck all the blame of society's woes on.

[CrunchyCripple]

Anyone who doesn't have a good stress-coping mechanism is at risk for a mental break.

That's not everyone - but there are shit ton of them out there.

[TypeOnegative]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

Oh, you don't like someone belittling your post full of generic generalizations, abstracts, and false equivalents, which was just you belittling a particular portion of the entire population that you have some skewed predisposition about which is obvious since you have these imaginary ideas.

The term "libtard" is befitting to those that have a retarded world view, with an "us vs them" mentality, which in turn makes them no better than the very people they try and shuck all the blame of society's woes on.

I specifically said I liked your post. Loved it even. Gave me the feels. Thanks for explaining Libtard to me. Your vernacular is pretty far above my head. If it weren’t for your thoughtful definition I would have never been able to decipher your post. You’ve gotta be, what, third or maybe even fourth grade level on the Flesch-Kincaid readability chart. I don’t know how anyone keeps up with you.

[TheVrist]

Originally Posted by TypeOnegative ↗

I specifically said I liked your post. Loved it even. Gave me the feels. Thanks for explaining Libtard to me. Your vernacular is pretty far above my head. If it weren’t for your thoughtful definition I would have never been able to decipher your post. You’ve gotta be, what, third or maybe even fourth grade level on the Flesch-Kincaid readability chart. I don’t know how anyone keeps up with you.

You're right. My response was concise enough for a teenager, maybe even younger, to understand enough to argue against it, if there is anything wrong with it. But, alas, a grown adult cannot, so they resort to childish insults under the guise of intellect.

#feelsgoodman

[TypeOnegative]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

You're right. My response was concise enough for a teenager, maybe even younger, to understand enough to argue against it, if there is anything wrong with it. But, alas, a grown adult cannot, so they resort to childish insults under the guise of intellect.

#feelsgoodman

Need someone to hold that horn you’re tooting? Looks a little big, even for two hands.

[TheVrist]

Originally Posted by TypeOnegative ↗

Need someone to hold that horn you’re tooting? Looks a little big, even for two hands.

Do you need a highchair next time you try sitting at the table with too much to consume? Next time don't bite off more than you can chew.

[TypeOnegative]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

Do you need a highchair next time you try sitting at the table with too much to consume? Next time don't bite off more than you can chew.

Don’t be silly, you have a tiny penis.