|
#62
●
11-06-2015, 08:47 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:3313 male Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 110 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 20 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Russian Passenger Aircraft Crash in Egypt
I love how whenever there is a legitimate terrorist attack the tin foil hat crowd uses the word "false flag." You sir are joke.
|
|
#63
●
11-07-2015, 12:23 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:2719 Male Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 151 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 68 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Russian Passenger Aircraft Crash in Egypt
I think some people including the press seem to think that intelligence is real time. It isn't in many cases. Just because the "big 5" intelligence services are just now claiming to have intercepts of discussing an explosive being placed on the jet, doesn't mean they knew it then. Radio and telecommunications can be bulk/spectrum recorded and archived. It can take days or weeks, especially with analog intercepts to be reviewed, found, translated, and authenticated before escalating the fragments of information to higher intel services where it's compositely pieced together. Furthermore, there would be a reluctance to expose their capabilities and may put covert human assets at risk. The Russians aren't stupid. They have similar capabilities and what happens at public rhetoric and nationalistic bluster is not what's happening through diplomatic and intelligence channels. All involved have their agendas which may conflict and there is a great degree of public politics involved. There are also covert ones as well. The Russians would be wary of being fed outside intel without confirmation due to the possibilities of other motives as there are several conflicting ones involved in the Mideast. Speaking of agendas. Putin has rode on a wave of nationalistic support and struggling to gain international relevance and influence. A bomb on the plane can be both a nightmare and godsend for him politically. Confirmation of terrorism will galvanize the public support that's wary of another Afghanistan snafu for ground troops and retaliation. In the face of the world and his country he has little choice but to intervene decisively after showing the world he's going to clean up a mess nobody else has the fortitude to do. Odds are he's going to hit massively and hard. Wherein lies a problem. If he does, it's going to provoke another terrorism wave on his own soil between the Caucasus and Chechnya regions. They've been relatively quiet and intervention is going to stir up problems that he's probably going to act preemptively, so I'd venture a guess those regions are sweating right now. Which brings up another point and perhaps the reason Putin has until now avoided targeting ISIS and concentrating on militias and groups targeting Assad. It's no secret that a lot of the foreign fighters with ISIS are from the Northern Caucasus and Chechyn regions. There was essentially a covert deportation program for years of routing out suspected Muslim extremists and giving them a one way ticket out of Russia rather then prison or military intervention. In short, they just exported their problems quietly. This might be the reason that up to now, they've avoided directly targeting ISIS in Syria. At some point they've awoken to the fact in the past years that these fighters that are now battle hardened and train may return to Russian soil and foment a powerful insurgency. Greece on the other hand not only has a tourism problem with 12-15% of thier GDP threatened to be lost. It also exposes a problem with Al Sisi's gov't. They've concentrated their resouces internally and neglected or lost control of the peripheral regions and Sinai to the Bedouins that live in the area. It's lawless in the Sinai now with little military or gov't resolve to deal with. Sharam air port had not exactly been a priority. Employees haven't been paid regularly, neglected by the central gov't and from reports, the officials there are soliciting bribes from tourists just to get through the bureaucracy and bypass security completely for $30 USD. It that's what they would take to let someone board submitting luggage and carry ons that would bypass screening and security. Imaging how much it would take to bribe someone on the ground/cargo crew or sterile areas of the air port. Egypt is complicit in this tragedy by neglect and governance. This is going to cost the present regime dearly. Putin is in between a rock and a hard place politically and respect. He either retaliates massively on two fronts at home and the mideast or loses face and support meanwhile the possibility of getting mired down into another nightmare that he can't afford. |
|
#68
●
11-07-2015, 05:13 PM
|
|
Re: Russian Passenger Aircraft Crash in Egypt
With a bomb, there is always evidence. Blast damage, shrapnel, residue, etc. I am guessing that political considerations have slowed down the release of information. Egypt stands to lose BILLION$ annually in tourist revenue which ISIS and associated moo slums know very well. |
|
#69
●
11-07-2015, 05:56 PM
|
|
Re: Russian Passenger Aircraft Crash in Egypt
This right Oswald. There is no evidence. They check and claimed no bomb was used. They can check with chemicals. Even ash. Russia shot that aircraft down with a missile they have. The one that doesn't explode but is more of a shotgun.
|
|
#70
●
11-07-2015, 06:58 PM
|
|
Re: Russian Passenger Aircraft Crash in Egypt
I'm still leaning toward mechanical/electrical/fuel breakdown. Cons for Russia doing it: It's fucking evil. Not necessary to want Russian folks to hate ISIS - It's a fugging dictatorship. Putin is loved and couldn't care less about public opinion on the matter. Cons for USA: NOt pulling the right empathy chords to get the US to join in. Cons ISIS missile: Too high Cons ISIS bomb: Had to get past security (although admittedly this is my second choice and second most likely to me) So that leaves the higher likelihood of a malfunction. Though it's hard for me to say that confidently. |