|
#172
●
10-24-2014, 08:49 PM
|
|
Re: Parliament Hill Shooting in Ottawa, Canada
Fuck off you do, and your hookers are ugly. I watch COPS and see what goes on in your police state. Our hookers are mostly HOTTTTTTT and guaranteed clean and disease free because it is legal here. Ours are not meth smoking crack heads standing on the side of a highway sucking cock for $10. |
|
#174
●
10-24-2014, 08:58 PM
|
|
Re: Parliament Hill Shooting in Ottawa, Canada
It's the illegal immigrant population bringing the cock sucking wages way down. Under cutting good wholesome American women out of a honest nights gobbling. But you don't get hot hookers on a street corner here. |
|
#177
●
10-24-2014, 09:13 PM
|
|
Re: Parliament Hill Shooting in Ottawa, Canada
My information might be a bit biased, there is a womens shelter (whore house) 2 doors down from me. I don't partake anymore but it is handy to know. If you are wanting a good holiday then go to the Philippines. Angeles City is hooker central and 2000pesos (approx $50) will get you a whole night of sucking and fucking. |
|
#178
●
10-24-2014, 09:21 PM
|
|
Re: Parliament Hill Shooting in Ottawa, Canada
Valid point. Our leader has decided to follow yours when it comes to international issues. It's unfortunate that he didn't take into account that it's also going to make us a target. |
|
#179
●
10-24-2014, 09:32 PM
|
|
Re: Parliament Hill Shooting in Ottawa, Canada
I'm happy that our leaders acknowledged that the greater goal of the attack was to create hate. It was an attack against our way of life. Other than giving our leaders better security, I'm hoping that they don't try to use this to push for any more infringement on our privacy. Just my outsiders perspective, and I mean no offence, but it looks like post 9/11 your privacy and personal rights were the biggest causality. I hope that doesn't happen here |
|
#180
●
10-25-2014, 02:43 PM
|
|
Re: Parliament Hill Shooting in Ottawa, Canada
I don't allow myself to be offended by the truth, broham. You're entirely right in your assessment; although there is no constitutional guarantee of "privacy" as most people apply the term, and the federal parasite had been looking for a way to chip away at our liberties and personal protections long before 9/11 occurred. I'm fully convinced that the feds allowed 9/11 to happen for the purposes of pushing both that agenda and their foreign policy agenda in the Middle East. It's sort of like what happened at Pearl Harbor: they knew the Japanese had chosen it as a target and they even went so far as to stockpile the proper medical supplies on location beforehand, but the powers-that-be wanted to involve us in Europe's war against Germany at a time when the American population was primarily isolationist and were incredibly wary -- and rightfully so -- of "foreign entanglements." They didn't have an active role in 9/11 any more than they did in Pearl Harbor, but they knew it was coming and allowed it to happen for the purpose of getting the population to go along with their plans. So I guess that begs the question: is Europe better now for America's involvement in WWII 70 years ago? Will the Middle East be better in 70 years for our involvement over there now? |