JavaScript and Cookies are required to view this site. Please enable both in your browser settings.
India's Top Court Dismisses Novartis Plea for Glivec Patent

Go Back  

India's Top Court Dismisses Novartis Plea for Glivec Patent 

Current Rating:

Join NowJoin Now
Old 04-01-2013, 04:30 AM
gatagato's Avatar
★ ********* ★
Poster Rank:235
Join Date: Jul 2009
Contributions: 368
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Quoted: 932 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
1/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss5565
India's top court has dismissed Swiss drugmaker Novartis AG's attempt to win patent protection for its cancer drug Glivec, a serious blow to Western pharmaceutical firms who are increasingly focusing on India to drive sales.

The decision also sets a benchmark for several intellectual property disputes in India, where many patented drugs are unaffordable for most of its 1.2 billion people, 40 percent of whom earn less than $1.25 a day.

India's domestic drugs market is the 14th largest globally, but with annual growth of 13-14 percent and the world's second biggest population, it has massive potential at a time when traditional developed markets have slowed down.

The Supreme Court's landmark ruling is likely to affect several other companies and their branded medicines.

Pfizer Inc's cancer drug Sutent and Roche Holding AG's hepatitis C treatment Pegasys lost their patented status in India last year, and Monday's ruling will make it tougher for them to win back patent protection.

"Henceforth, multinational pharma companies are likely to want that their patents are first recognized in India before launch of a patented product," said Ameet Hariani, managing partner at Mumbai-based law firm Hariani & Co.

Novartis has previously that said it needs legal certainty if it is to plan further investment in drug research in India.

The ruling is a boost for healthcare activists who want the government to make medicines cheaper in a country where patented drugs constitute under 10 percent of total drug sales.

Novartis has been fighting since 2006 to win a patent for an amended form of Glivec. In 2009 it took its challenge against a law that bans patents on newer but not radically different forms of known drugs to the Supreme Court.

India has refused protection for Glivec on the grounds that it is not a new medicine but an amended version of a known compound. By contrast, the newer form of Glivec has been patented in nearly 40 countries including the United States, Russia and China.

The Supreme Court decided that Glivec does not satisfy the "novelty" aspect, Pravin Anand, lawyer for Novartis, told reporters.

Shares in Novartis India Ltd, the Indian unit of the drugmaker, fell over 5 percent after the verdict. They were down 4.63 percent at 571.10 rupees by 1:28 a.m. EDT.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to gatagato For This Useful Post:
JONESJIM, kellyhound, mengala
Old 04-01-2013, 11:55 PM
mengala's Avatar
Poster Rank:460
Join Date: Apr 2010
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 453 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 16/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss2289
$ > lives
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mengala For This Useful Post:
gatagato, michmi
Old 04-02-2013, 12:30 AM
xstunt1ngx's Avatar
Poster Rank:840
Join Date: Nov 2009
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss879
Originally Posted by mengala View Post
$ > lives
Those fuckers would sell their mom for a dollar.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to xstunt1ngx For This Useful Post:

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO