[BlueNosePit]

Originally Posted by AmericanIllusions ↗

Its crazy it took this long. So to all the **** out there that were so sure he did "nothing wrong", eat a sun baked dick. The prosecutor thinks he did.

youre black arent you?
if some dude attacks me and is banging my head on the concrete ima shoot his ass too.
trayvon beat the shit out of a bus driver earlier in the year. he was prone to violence.

[BlueNosePit]

Originally Posted by WinglessAngel ↗

The issue here is that IT TOOK SO LONG TO ARREST AND PUT THE MAN IN JAIL FOR KILLING TRAYVON. I'm not saying he's guilty.

And besides, the Prosecutors DO think he did it, they absolutely wouldn't go to trial without meeting the criteria necessary for a prosecution ....would they??? LMAO Prosecutors make horrid judgements sometimes. It will play out in time.

took so long cause they wanna be sure they have a good solid case. and it only took 6 weeks so it really didnt take long to arrest him.
and the special prosecutor had to charge him due to all the fucking retards protesting and shit.
if that Anthony bitch was found innocent of killing her baby by a FL jury so will he will.

[AmericanIllusions]

Originally Posted by BlueNosePit ↗

youre black arent you?
if some dude attacks me and is banging my head on the concrete ima shoot his ass too.
trayvon beat the shit out of a bus driver earlier in the year. he was prone to violence.

HOW THE FUCK DO U GET OUT OF YOUR CAR AFTER STALKING A GUY THEN GET ATTACKED? And whos story you running with, Zimmerman's????? The conflict of interest here is as big as my cock. Why wouldnt he lie? It would only keep him out of prison. No big deal, right. U fucks are still talkin shit, even after the facts have been laid out. No manslaughter here, MURDER, which is what they gave him.

[mrmojo]

Originally Posted by AmericanIllusions ↗

Its crazy it took this long. So to all the **** out there that were so sure he did "nothing wrong", eat a sun baked dick. The prosecutor thinks he did.

It doesn't matter if the prosecution thinks he did it or not. He HAS to be tried. If not Sharpton and his cronies will be screaming about how whitey can kill a black kid and get away with it. Why does this not go to a grand jury first and do an investigation? And even if Zimmerman is found to be 100 % innocent the family and black community will not accept it.

[mrmojo]

Oh, did I mention Zimmerman is totally fucked either way?

[Syphilis]

If they hadn't charged Zimmerman with something the black community was going to riot. If Zimmerman is found not guilty the black community is going to riot...classic catch-22.

[Seven Of Nine]

Originally Posted by BlueNosePit ↗

took so long cause they wanna be sure they have a good solid case. and it only took 6 weeks so it really didnt take long to arrest him.
and the special prosecutor had to charge him due to all the fucking retards protesting and shit.
if that Anthony bitch was found innocent of killing her baby by a FL jury so will he will.

I will politely disagree. I believe using your theory, we could all go out and shoot someone dead (so long as there were no witnesses) and expect not to be arrested?

Sure, there have been cases where it's abundantly clear that self defence was required and in those 100% certain cases there may be no arrest at all ...but this is one living persons word against no ones word.

So again I say, following your thought process, we can all shoot someone dead when no one is looking, remain at the scene and claim self defence then go home and sleep in our own bed? I don't think I like how that plays out. If it were your mother, sister, daughter, father, best friend ..and the one person claiming self defence were the only witness, would you truly be ok knowing, that same night, he was at home with his family?

[AmericanIllusions]

Originally Posted by Syphilis ↗

If they hadn't charged Zimmerman with something the black community was going to riot. If Zimmerman is found not guilty the black community is going to riot...classic catch-22.

you sound like a gotdamn idiot. there have been PLENTY cases where a guy was let off after public outcry for justice. They wont charge the guy with murder when they could of easily got manslaughter just to shut the ppl up. There has to be a reason for the murder instead. You understand? Prob not because cannon fodder rarely thinks.

[bdjackass318]

i will only say that the trial will be interesting

[Syphilis]

Originally Posted by AmericanIllusions ↗

you sound like a gotdamn idiot. there have been PLENTY cases where a guy was let off after public outcry for justice. They wont charge the guy with murder when they could of easily got manslaughter just to shut the ppl up. There has to be a reason for the murder instead. You understand? Prob not because cannon fodder rarely thinks.

I hope you don't always resort to name calling whenever you disagree with someone, it makes you look childish. Please, name one case where the public outcry even comes close to that of this case. I can think of a few but one in particular stands out. I'm sure you remember what happened in L.A. 20 years ago right? Does the name Rodney King ring any bells? And as for the murder charge well...time will tell. I think the evidence favors Zimmerman. Anything short of video footage of the incident or a credible eyewitness is going to result in a not guilty verdict. And like I said previously...not guilty=rioting.