JavaScript and Cookies are required to view this site. Please enable both in your browser settings.
Woman Vs Pitbull - Section 12

Woman Vs Pitbull 

Current Rating:

Unlimited Views No Ads No Algorithms Lifetime Account

Documenting Reality

Community Forum · Est. 2006

Join Now
Thread Tools
  #111  
11-01-2013, 11:03 AM
FNAL's Avatar
FNAL
Offline:
My Rank: FIRST SERGEANT
Poster Rank:473
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,275
 
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Quoted: 1262 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
1/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss2275
Re: Woman Vs Pitbull

It doesn't matter how many stories of dogs attacking people you post, unless they ALL do it, the theory is flawed.
So let me get this straight. Even if 99% of all pitbulls attacked their owners, just because 1% didn't, then we can't label pitbulls as aggressive and dangerous? Where is the flaw in that logic?
▼ PROMO FROM DOCUMENTING REALITY
Feeling out of place? You’ll fit in here
Join Now
Hidden for upgraded members.
  #112  
11-01-2013, 12:05 PM
GlowingGhoul's Avatar
GlowingGhoul
Offline:
My Rank: STAFF SERGEANT
Poster Rank:760
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,054
 
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 13/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss1054
Re: Woman Vs Pitbull

So let me get this straight. Even if 99% of all pitbulls attacked their owners, just because 1% didn't, then we can't label pitbulls as aggressive and dangerous? Where is the flaw in that logic?
Yes, that's exactly what he's saying, and yes, it's flawed logic.

On the other hand he's not a self deluded lying fuck like the pitbull arselickers here claiming pitbulls are no more dangerous than a chihuahua.
  #113  
11-01-2013, 06:08 PM
FNAL's Avatar
FNAL
Offline:
My Rank: FIRST SERGEANT
Poster Rank:473
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,275
 
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Quoted: 1262 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
1/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss2275
Re: Woman Vs Pitbull

Yes, that's exactly what he's saying, and yes, it's flawed logic.

On the other hand he's not a self deluded lying fuck like the pitbull arselickers here claiming pitbulls are no more dangerous than a chihuahua.
Okay, I have a bucket of 100 balls. 99 of them are red and one is colored blue. Do you not think it would be a safe bet to assume that if you reached in and pulled out 1 ball without looking, it will be red? Please show me your logic in this since this one is flawed, apparently.
  #114  
11-01-2013, 06:12 PM
GlowingGhoul's Avatar
GlowingGhoul
Offline:
My Rank: STAFF SERGEANT
Poster Rank:760
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,054
 
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 13/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss1054
Re: Woman Vs Pitbull

Okay, I have a bucket of 100 balls. 99 of them are red and one is colored blue. Do you not think it would be a safe bet to assume that if you reached in and pulled out 1 ball without looking, it will be red? Please show me your logic in this since this one is flawed, apparently.
I was agreeing with your assertion that his logic, not yours, was flawed.
  #115  
11-01-2013, 10:56 PM
FNAL's Avatar
FNAL
Offline:
My Rank: FIRST SERGEANT
Poster Rank:473
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,275
 
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Quoted: 1262 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
1/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss2275
Re: Woman Vs Pitbull

I was agreeing with your assertion that his logic, not yours, was flawed.
Oh okay, I must have missed who/what you were talking about then.
  #116  
11-01-2013, 11:01 PM
RReaper
Offline:
My Rank: CORPORAL
Poster Rank:1521
Male
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 373
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss373
Re: Woman Vs Pitbull

i don't give a shit what you pitbull cock riders say
Sorry to fuck up your little theory but I can assure you I don't ride cock and I own a Pitbull .

yes they are. and if you own one, you are either an idiot or an asshole, period.
It takes a village to make an idiot , And an asshole to think its a Pitbull owner

All pitbulls should be killed with fire. End of.
In the ’70s they blamed Dobermans, in the ’80s they blamed German Shepherds, in the ’90s they blamed Rottweilers. Now they blame the Pit Bull. When will they blame the humans?

Cant be bothered quoting more stupids , but you get my point
2 Users Say Thank You For This Post:
FuManBoobs, Stefalicious
  #117  
11-02-2013, 01:31 AM
exKitten's Avatar
exKitten
Offline:
My Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS
Poster Rank:3590
female
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 96
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 13/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss96
Re: Woman Vs Pitbull

loved that the vid was kinda blurred of the woman, but the ass-crack was crystal
  #118  
11-02-2013, 02:47 AM
SmokeyNite's Avatar
SmokeyNite
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:2730
female
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 150
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
1/20 18/20
Today Posts
1/11 ssssss150
Re: Woman Vs Pitbull

This whole debate is the old nature vs nurture debate. ANY dog can be vicious and attack. My uncle had a golden retriever that bit several people, including his wife who needed stitches. They had to put the dog to sleep because it was crazed due to being overbred and not being trained.

Most of these "pit bulls" aren't pit bulls at all. There is no breed called "pit bull" but there are several bull terrier dogs. Anything that LOOKS like a pittie gets labeled that. http://understand-a-bull.com/Findthe...itbull_v3.html http://thetruthaboutpitbulls.blogspo...-pit-bull.html

There are many myths about pitties. Just spend a few minutes doing some actual research, and you'll find hundreds of sites that refute them. http://www.petfinder.com/pet-adoptio...out-pit-bulls/

I didn't get my girls because I wanted a pit bull. I literally rescued Mira off the highway and Maddy I got as a lab mix. Maddy is the dog that my dog trainer uses to get aggressive dogs to like other dogs. The black lab in her class is the one that tries to attack everyone, not Maddy.

Yes, there are rare occasions in which people are bitten, and yes, they do more damage, but they aren't the most aggressive. Breed specific laws don't help at all. Education is the only thing that works
2 Users Say Thank You For This Post:
FuManBoobs, sprchrgdtrky
  #119  
11-02-2013, 09:21 AM
FuManBoobs
Offline:
My Rank: GUNNERY SERGEANT
Poster Rank:697
Male
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,219
 
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 257 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss1219
Re: Woman Vs Pitbull

So let me get this straight. Even if 99% of all pitbulls attacked their owners, just because 1% didn't, then we can't label pitbulls as aggressive and dangerous? Where is the flaw in that logic?
No, I'm saying you CAN say they're aggressive, but you can't say that every single one of them will attack someone.
This User Says Thank You For This Post:
kc21
  #120  
11-02-2013, 09:24 AM
FuManBoobs
Offline:
My Rank: GUNNERY SERGEANT
Poster Rank:697
Male
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,219
 
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 257 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss1219
Re: Woman Vs Pitbull

Yes, that's exactly what he's saying, and yes, it's flawed logic.

On the other hand he's not a self deluded lying fuck like the pitbull arselickers here claiming pitbulls are no more dangerous than a chihuahua.
The only flawed logic I'm seeing is from the few people trying to argue that no matter how you treat something it will go on to attack someone.

I guess we should ban all guns too because they all shoot, they can all kill...doesn't matter about the owners. Now that is flawed logic.


Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO