[Killgaad]

Originally Posted by Simone ↗

You can call it what you want, but you are a racist.

I would very much like it if my daughter were to be in a mixed race relationship when she's older. Why on earth wouldn't I be fine with that?

My son is mixed race (Chinese, Vietnamese + white European) - what would your issue with this be?

Edit: Though added to that, I have told my son that he should 'stick to his own kind', but that's because I love East Asians! Also that my daughter should have an East Asian or black partner. Though ultimately, it's up to them, nothing to do with me.

Simone, I profoundly respect your choices as an individual, but I respectfully also believe that your daughter ought to be the one who makes her choices in such matters, uninfluenced by politics or anyone else's agenda or beliefs—except for the duty of racial preservation.

The reason I think miscegenation is wrong, is because a person has a duty to their own blood and their own race.

Miscegenation constitutes a criminal act against nature.

We have evolved to be separate ethnic entities, and in that resides the true beauty of diversity and multiculturalism—i.e., the right and duty of every race and ethnicity to exist as a unique, beautiful and distinct creation.

If everybody were to intermingle as the globalists want us to, the long-term result would be extermination of all races—and according to the UN statutes, that would constitute genocide.

I say this most respectfully, but it is a question of degree. I have nothing against mixed people at all, as individuals—quite the contrary, I love all people. But the White race in particular is not procreating at a sustainability level, and the long-term effect of continued interracial mixing would be the complete and irreversible extermination of all the White peoples—through the forced demographic displacement which is occurring now in all the White countries and the miscegenation that the enemy is pushing so aggressively only in said White countries—while the enemy enforces strict racial purity in their own country.

My beliefs are only based or long-term demographic projections, not on truly racist ideas.

But if the word racist means preserving the interest of my own race (as anyone else does)—then I proudly am a racist.

But this doesn't mean I don't love people of other races—as long as they don't threaten, en masse, the survival of my own ethnicity.

I realize this is a delicate and contentious topic, so I'm trying to address your question with the utmost respect.

Regards.

[Killgaad]

My dear fellow forum members and friends, I thank you all for the conversation, and I am confident that we can all make progress in finding more common ground as we go along. If I ever personally offended any of you previously, it was not out of malice, and I do regret it—though part of the fun of this site is the heated conversation. In any case, I truly wish all of you to stay safe out there and again, Happy New Year!

I must now apologize but I have to do some work for business.

Regards to all.

[Susan]

Originally Posted by Simone ↗

Yes, because the shit you've caused over the years here have been so pleasant for all those involved.

Least I'm a valuable member here, whether you like it or not. You have brought the site down for so long + even tried to fuck Chris over, but here you still are.

Yeah. He contacted me. Your repetitiveness is starting to grate..... Explain how he is a nonce.

[Susan]

Originally Posted by Simone ↗

You can call it what you want, but you are a racist.

I would very much like it if my daughter were to be in a mixed-race relationship when she's older. Why on earth wouldn't I be fine with that?

My son is mixed-race (Chinese, Vietnamese + white European) - what would your issue with this be?

Edit: Though added to that, I have told my son that he should 'stick to his own kind', but that's because I love East Asians! Also that my daughter should have an East Asian or black partner. Though ultimately, it's up to them, nothing to do with me.

Maybe they should find a BOB?

[SimoneFlen']

Originally Posted by Killgaad ↗

If everybody were to intermingle as the globalists want us to, the long-term result would be extermination of all races—and according to the UN statutes, that would constitute genocide.

I totally get what you're saying, I'd never thought of it that way. It would be a big shame for that to ever happen, but I really don't think it ever will.

Do you agree with any white people together, or do they have to be from certain countries?

If you have children (or even if you don't) would you try to steer them away from a mixed-race relationship?

[M.F.D.B.]

[Killgaad]

Originally Posted by Simone ↗

I totally get what you're saying, I'd never thought of it that way. It would be a big shame for that to ever happen, but I really don't think it ever will.

Do you agree with any white people together, or do they have to be from certain countries?

If you have children (or even if you don't) would you try to steer them away from a mixed-race relationship?

Simone, your question is very profound, and I find myself between a rock and a hard place answering it—not because of the legitimate inquisitiveness and morality of your question, but rather because of the unfair burdens and geographical (spatial and topographic) limitations that Nature imposes upon our species and the corresponding individual races and ethnicities—being forced to compete for resources and territory, in order to prosper and proliferate their respective tribe, as it were.

In my heart of hearts, I believe, firmly, that from a moral standpoint, love should trump any other considerations—racial matters included.

But how can we reconcile this idealistic liberalism—if the long-term consequence of such interracial sexual openness (in terms of the resulting offspring) manifests in the extermination of all races?

This is a conundrum which has wrested my conscience for a long time—for if true love blossoms, albeit between two people of different races, who has the right to deny that intrinsic human right to raise a family?

So how are we to balance out these sobering implications and still remain fair to all?

That is why perhaps it was better not to open Pandora's box to begin with—and I'm afraid it is quite a bit too late now already.

I thank you for your question—it is a very profound one, the answer to which vexes me to this day.

As I continue to grow as a person, perhaps I can come up with a better answer as I continue my philosophical endeavors—but either way, for now, such matters are out of our hands anyway, unless nationalism regains the former strength of quondam times, when each garden, metaphorically speaking, was planted primarily with its own seeds.

P.S. I apologize for my loquaciousness—I know it's rather long prose, but your question is exceedingly complex.

Thank you.

[Killgaad]

I have no problem with European ethnicities intermingling, because they encompass the same genetic pool—and as such, I see them as non-competing.

Sadly, and this pains me to say it, but yes, I would most certainly dissuade my children from dating anybody outside of their own race, and especially from producing mixed offspring.

However, if that somehow came to pass, even against my wishes, it doesn't mean I would shun them or disown them.

Like I said, I treat people on an individual basis, so I would probably love them the same.

My ideas on race are purely sociological, scientific and demographic in scope.

We try to save other animal species from extinction all the time, so I don't see anything wrong with trying to preserve each individual human race and its genetic purity and authenticity.

Just as we would not want to mix the Eskimos out of existence, for example, or the Chinese, or the Japanese, or the Jews, or the Swedes, or the Indians, or the many African nationalities, and so on.

I hope I somewhat succeeded in addressing your question, Simone.

[Killgaad]

And in terms of our impending extermination in less than a hundred years 'never happening,' I most fervently hope you're right.

But something needs to be done about it. Mass immigration into European countries and the US must be reversed and stopped, or what used to be the crown and jewels all of the West will become an amorphous, beaten and conquered territory—the new phalanx of the Third World.

[Killgaad]

typo: "of all of the West"