[SneakySniper169]

I get Driving fast but shit. At least know how to fucking drive if you are going to drive like that.

[Azimuth]

Originally Posted by zen0 ↗

Typical Asian driver. Look at the reaction time.

He/she was busy updating their status on fb.

[petteroes3]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

Men cause 6.1 million accidents per year and women cause 4.4 million per year (National Highway Safety Administration)
105.7 million women and 104.3 million men have drivers licenses (University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute)
On average, men drive 16,550 miles and women drive 10,142 miles per year ( Federal Highway Administration)
So men account for roughly 1.73^12 miles driven per year, while women drive a combined total of 1.07^12 miles per year.

That means men drive about 30 percent more miles than women. Yet, they’re implicated in slightly less than 30 percent of car accidents. Men do cause more accidents, but they are actually less at-risk than women, by a small margin.

Sorry to wreck your femenazi KIA hybrid.

Oh my. Look how good you are at copy-pasting from the first article that shows up

Oh by the way...

"On a per-mile basis, men get into about twice as many fatal crashes as women."

Per mile. Yeah. From the same source that you used. Chose to ignore that, huh?

Sit the fuck down.

[midwestguy]

Sowwwwyyyyyy

[TheVrist]

Originally Posted by petteroes3 ↗

Oh my. Look how good you are at copy-pasting from the first article that shows up

Oh by the way...

"On a per-mile basis, men get into about twice as many fatal crashes as women."

Per mile. Yeah. From the same source that you used. Chose to ignore that, huh?

Sit the fuck down.

What difference does it make if it was copy and pasted? You think that I don't know people can copy and past the first line to anything into google and get the source if there is one? I do it on a daily basis in the political forums. Do you think I don't know the go to place is google for answers they think contradicts their own feelings?

If it was an feat of mine to attempt to make it my own, i'd simply paraphrase it. I knew people would automatically google the references of women vs men driving, and the copy and pasted source would be the first. I bet you felt a nice tinge of victory, over nothing. Too bad for you, for thinking everyone is as simple minded as you. Most likely a projection.

Sorry to burst your bubble.. Now, on to your pathetic assertion.

I realize you plebs don't understand a per-capita adjustment. 30% margin of miles traveled, balanced to death ratios of both male and females always sums out to females having a higher risk than males, because of the amount of crashes within a statistical set standard equaling the over all miles traveled in each group.

The margin isn't great enough to say "women are worst drivers" the margin is small enough to say that both men and women are near equally bad drivers, that women have a slight risk over males because of that 30% margin, equated to the amount of deaths, in relation to small variables.

Now, that's just raw statistics. Much like saying 13% of the population is responsible for over 50% of the violent crimes, statistically true in raw form. But if we took out some very realistic variables, it would actually be around 6% of the population.

Now let's review some possible variables in the raw statistics.

If we removed occupational hazard statistics, such as Truck drivers (5% of truck drivers are women), first respondents (only 7-10% are women), cab services (unknown by my own research, but observation would suggest very few), which makes up a large portion of the "30% more miles than women" and would also knock down the statistics for male driver casualties, which is something the female subject isn't burdened with since career choices never put her in that position.

it would narrow the playing field down to women being far more a shitty driver.

Now send me an address for your brand new pussy hat.

[petteroes3]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

What difference does it make if it was copy and pasted? You think that I don't know people can copy and past the first line to anything into google and get the source if there is one? I do it on a daily basis in the political forums. Do you think I don't know the go to place is google for answers they think contradicts their own feelings?

If it was an feat of mine to attempt to make it my own, i'd simply paraphrase it. I knew people would automatically google the references of women vs men driving, and the copy and pasted source would be the first. I bet you felt a nice tinge of victory, over nothing. Too bad for you, for thinking everyone is as simple minded as you. Most likely a projection.

Sorry to burst your bubble.. Now, on to your pathetic assertion.

I realize you plebs don't understand a per-capita adjustment. 30% margin of miles traveled, balanced to death ratios of both male and females always sums out to females having a higher risk than males, because of the amount of crashes within a statistical set standard equaling the over all miles traveled in each group.

The margin isn't great enough to say "women are worst drivers" the margin is small enough to say that both men and women are near equally bad drivers, that women have a slight risk over males because of that 30% margin, equated to the amount of deaths, in relation to small variables.

Now, that's just raw statistics. Much like saying 13% of the population is responsible for over 50% of the violent crimes, statistically true in raw form. But if we took out some very realistic variables, it would actually be around 6% of the population.

Now let's review some possible variables in the raw statistics.

If we removed occupational hazard statistics, such as Truck drivers (5% of truck drivers are women), first respondents (only 7-10% are women), cab services (unknown by my own research, but observation would suggest very few), which makes up a large portion of the "30% more miles than women" and would also knock down the statistics for male driver casualties, which is something the female subject isn't burdened with since career choices never put her in that position.

it would narrow the playing field down to women being far more a shitty driver.

Now send me an address for your brand new pussy hat.

Hey. You should probably relax so you don't cry.

Your desperate rambling is not gonna change the conclusion that men get into twice as many fatal crashes than women. Per mile. And that's in America. In my country, men drive just under 50% more than women, but there are more women drivers.
Still 117 of 135 fatal crashes are by men this year. Like. Dude. It's obvious.

My first comment stands. I'm right. You can't change that no matter how you whine about irrelevant shit

[TheVrist]

Originally Posted by petteroes3 ↗

Hey. You should probably relax so you don't cry.

Your desperate rambling is not gonna change the conclusion that men get into twice as many fatal crashes than women. Per mile. And that's in America. In my country, men drive just under 50% more than women, but there are more women drivers.
Still 117 of 135 fatal crashes are by men this year. Like. Dude. It's obvious.

My first comment stands. I'm right. You can't change that no matter how you whine about irrelevant shit

I won based on your emotional response totally rejecting how statistics actually work.

Plus the original triggering that got you to look stupid in the first place.

[petteroes3]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

I won based on your emotional response totally rejecting how statistics actually work.

Plus the original triggering that got you to look stupid in the first place.

You keep telling yourself that, sweetums

[TheVrist]

Originally Posted by petteroes3 ↗

You keep telling yourself that, sweetums

Thank you. I will always keep telling myself to consider the laws of statistical deviations. You should try it. Tell your friends about it too. They might accidentally learn something new about the world around them.

[TOMKAT65]

Holy Fuck!