|
#31
●
04-17-2020, 02:38 AM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: CORPORAL Poster Rank:1317 Join Date: May 2017 Posts: 459 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 110 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Rival Takes Shots to the Dome
Compared to a 9mm, that bullet obliterated his noggin because 7.62 NATO: Produces 4x as much energy as 9mm Weighs 3.5x as much as 9mm Travels around 2.5x faster than 9mm |
|
#35
●
04-17-2020, 03:50 PM
| ||||||||
 ★ Legacy Member ★ Poster Rank:7 What we've got here is failure to communicate. Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 103,591
Contributions: 3
Mentioned: 112 Post(s) Quoted: 43397 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Rival Takes Shots to the Dome
I was going to say it was a British SLR, apparently, they are the same rifle.  |
|
#36
●
04-20-2020, 04:09 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: FIRST LIEUTENANT Poster Rank:238 Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 5,940 Mentioned: 4 Post(s) Quoted: 873 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Rival Takes Shots to the Dome
Most likely a 7.62 NATO, .308 is a bad choice for the FAL due to its thin case being prone to extraction failures among other problems. (And I doubt that rifle is a commercially imported ons as this incident happened in a Latin American country not in the continental US)
|
|
#38
●
04-24-2020, 12:03 AM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:2057 Male Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 237 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 44 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Rival Takes Shots to the Dome
How about this? One of these guys must have the latest and greatest in technology. Next guy uses apple's or android latest slow motion feature but places the camera a mere inches from the point of impact. Taa daa! Damn I'm fucked up  |
