[petedeamon]

The beating was north of "Texas" but soon went south of the border!

[claytoaj]

Right there, right when the pole went up your ass, you fucker, that's when it got real for you. Remember how that felt. Now you know.

[-NocturnalPulse-]

Originally Posted by docfr8 ↗

No sympathy for rapist/molesters. He was O.K. when forcefully had his way with the victims. Now the tables have turned and he gets to be subjected to the same.. Fuck him.. Let him suffer just like his victims suffered...

Exactly. fuck him. Eye for an eye

[Biishya]

They need to employ that same system here in the U.S.

[vorsini]

love those faggy underwear

[Politkovskaja]

[LrlynJy]

that's the best punishment for the guilty rapists...

[LrlynJy]

it would be a big rape deterrent if governments would proclaim that they are willing to let vigilante justice like that occur inside jails if the person was really found guilty.

[FuManBoobs]

Originally Posted by 888Creep ↗

Yes, because wanting vengeance on someone that has hurt you or society is exactly like victimising someone who has done nothing to you or society with a heinous act such as rape, based solely on you being horny (because, prostitution doesn't exist for incels like you).

Did you even read what you wrote or did you just slap a load of rubbish down to sound above it all and oh so intellectual? I wonder why someone like you and all the other moral superiors comes to a site where these kinds of videos are common.

I think you're the one with "backwards logic". You offer no answer just the same old talking points. Blah, blah, blah, environment, blah, blah, more conjecture.

Yeah, I read what I wrote. Obviously you didn't. The fact is advocating vengeance on someone is advocating harm on someone, just as it is with rape.

You're simply stating the reasons are different. OK...That's my point. Thanks for stating it again for me.

My "backwards logic" is actually just logic. I don't advocate the harming of anyone when they've already been removed from society.

Just because you may have an emotional disposition that suspends your critical thinking skills doesn't mean there are no answers.

There are many answers which are long and complex, but there is also a need for people to realise the indoctrinated behavioural patterns they've come to accept as "simply the way it is" in order for those answers to be sought in the first place.

If you think it's conjecture to say environment influences behaviour and that free will hasn't been shown to even exist, then I would like to hear your reasoning why.

[FuManBoobs]

Originally Posted by tootsieflowrslave ↗

So what you are saying is that punitive measures against a violent criminal is morally bankrupt and we shouldn't hold such criminals to be accountable for what they have done? Wouldn't having no fear of retribution or apprehension encourage criminal behavior?

While you claim society ignores factors that contribute to criminal behavior, you are ignoring the effects that violent crime and sex predators have on its victims. People victimized by these animals were essentially forced into environments they didn't choose to be in and have been unwillingly conditioned to believe in negative perceptions while suffering from emotional trauma that will haunt them for the rest of their lives. That being said, I am not convinced that victims must be denied having justice served to those who committed unjust acts towards themselves and I think it's ludicrous to treat people who seek justice as being morally bankrupt.

Tell us again how you would propose to do things differently?

No, that's not what I said.

I'm saying we should hold people accountable for their actions, but we shouldn't blame and punish them for situations that led to that behaviour which were beyond their control - the country they were born in, the culture, society, sub-culture, parents, social relations, media influences, socio-economic pressures etc.

We don't blame a shark for being a shark, but if there is one in your swimming pool it's best to take notice of it.

Depending on what kind of social system and other environmental influences you experience will play a key role in determining your abhorrent behaviours.

Would a system that lets people who commit acts of violence gain advantage see more people commit acts of violence? Sure.

But when we look at countries where the justice system is more lenient or more geared towards rehabilitation rather than punishment we also see a decrease in crime rates. If retribution was a deciding factor then I don't see how this could be the case.

A key example might be the death sentence states in USA. Those states that carry out the death sentence actually have HIGHER murder rates than those who do not.

I aware that punishments can be effective but from what I understand for the punishment to be most effective it has to be carried out as close to the abhorrent behaviour as possible.

Seeking "justice" can mean completely different things for different people. Meeting suffering with suffering is bankrupt in my opinion.

How would I do things differently? Change the environment to change the behaviour. Not having such a competitive market system where everyone has to compete for monetary gain and social status. I could go on but I only want to demonstrate the current failings in the way things are looked at currently.